An interval-scaled scoring algorithm for visual function questionnaires

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE. The primary purpose of the study is to present and test a simple algorithm for scoring visual function questionnaires (VFQs) that approximates person measure estimates from Rasch analysis, does not introduce nonlinearities at extreme scores, and is insensitive to missing data. A secondary purpose is to test the hypothesis that all VFQs measure the same visual ability variable and can be calibrated to a common measurement scale. METHODS. Each of 407 consecutively recruited low vision patients were administered two of four visual function questionnaires: Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADVS), National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ), 14-item Visual Functioning Index (VF-14), Visual Activities Questionnaire (VAQ). Separate Rasch analyses, using the Andrich rating scale model, were performed on responses to each of the four VFQs and again on the merged data of all instruments. An approximation of visual ability, based on average functional reserve and an inverse hyperbolic tangent transformation, is presented and tested by comparing visual ability estimates from the Rasch analyses to corresponding estimates from the approximations. RESULTS. Relative to person measure estimates from Rasch analysis, the approximations were observed to be linear and highly reliable (intraclass correlations ranged from 0.97 to 0.997). The measurement scale of each of the four instruments was observed to be a linear transformation of the measurement scale estimated from the merged responses of all four instruments. The approximation algorithm transforms rating scale responses for each instrument to a common measurement scale. By randomly censuring item responses for each subject, it was demonstrated that the approximation algorithm is robust and insensitive to missing data. CONCLUSIONS. A simple scoring algorithm based on an inverse hyperbolic tangent transformation of average functional reserve produces highly reliable approximations of visual ability estimated from Rasch analysis for the ADVS, NEI VFQ, VAQ, and VF-14. All four instruments measure the same visual ability variable in units that can be calibrated to a common measurement scale.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalOptometry and Vision Science
Volume84
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2007

Fingerprint

National Eye Institute (U.S.)
Activities of Daily Living
Low Vision
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Low vision
  • Patient-centered
  • Quality of life
  • Rasch analysis
  • Self-assessment
  • Visual impairment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

An interval-scaled scoring algorithm for visual function questionnaires. / Massof, Robert W.

In: Optometry and Vision Science, Vol. 84, No. 8, 08.2007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{13e8e1a3264440f497443b3d29a922dd,
title = "An interval-scaled scoring algorithm for visual function questionnaires",
abstract = "PURPOSE. The primary purpose of the study is to present and test a simple algorithm for scoring visual function questionnaires (VFQs) that approximates person measure estimates from Rasch analysis, does not introduce nonlinearities at extreme scores, and is insensitive to missing data. A secondary purpose is to test the hypothesis that all VFQs measure the same visual ability variable and can be calibrated to a common measurement scale. METHODS. Each of 407 consecutively recruited low vision patients were administered two of four visual function questionnaires: Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADVS), National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ), 14-item Visual Functioning Index (VF-14), Visual Activities Questionnaire (VAQ). Separate Rasch analyses, using the Andrich rating scale model, were performed on responses to each of the four VFQs and again on the merged data of all instruments. An approximation of visual ability, based on average functional reserve and an inverse hyperbolic tangent transformation, is presented and tested by comparing visual ability estimates from the Rasch analyses to corresponding estimates from the approximations. RESULTS. Relative to person measure estimates from Rasch analysis, the approximations were observed to be linear and highly reliable (intraclass correlations ranged from 0.97 to 0.997). The measurement scale of each of the four instruments was observed to be a linear transformation of the measurement scale estimated from the merged responses of all four instruments. The approximation algorithm transforms rating scale responses for each instrument to a common measurement scale. By randomly censuring item responses for each subject, it was demonstrated that the approximation algorithm is robust and insensitive to missing data. CONCLUSIONS. A simple scoring algorithm based on an inverse hyperbolic tangent transformation of average functional reserve produces highly reliable approximations of visual ability estimated from Rasch analysis for the ADVS, NEI VFQ, VAQ, and VF-14. All four instruments measure the same visual ability variable in units that can be calibrated to a common measurement scale.",
keywords = "Low vision, Patient-centered, Quality of life, Rasch analysis, Self-assessment, Visual impairment",
author = "Massof, {Robert W}",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1097/OPX.0b013e31812f5f35",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
journal = "Optometry and Vision Science",
issn = "1040-5488",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An interval-scaled scoring algorithm for visual function questionnaires

AU - Massof, Robert W

PY - 2007/8

Y1 - 2007/8

N2 - PURPOSE. The primary purpose of the study is to present and test a simple algorithm for scoring visual function questionnaires (VFQs) that approximates person measure estimates from Rasch analysis, does not introduce nonlinearities at extreme scores, and is insensitive to missing data. A secondary purpose is to test the hypothesis that all VFQs measure the same visual ability variable and can be calibrated to a common measurement scale. METHODS. Each of 407 consecutively recruited low vision patients were administered two of four visual function questionnaires: Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADVS), National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ), 14-item Visual Functioning Index (VF-14), Visual Activities Questionnaire (VAQ). Separate Rasch analyses, using the Andrich rating scale model, were performed on responses to each of the four VFQs and again on the merged data of all instruments. An approximation of visual ability, based on average functional reserve and an inverse hyperbolic tangent transformation, is presented and tested by comparing visual ability estimates from the Rasch analyses to corresponding estimates from the approximations. RESULTS. Relative to person measure estimates from Rasch analysis, the approximations were observed to be linear and highly reliable (intraclass correlations ranged from 0.97 to 0.997). The measurement scale of each of the four instruments was observed to be a linear transformation of the measurement scale estimated from the merged responses of all four instruments. The approximation algorithm transforms rating scale responses for each instrument to a common measurement scale. By randomly censuring item responses for each subject, it was demonstrated that the approximation algorithm is robust and insensitive to missing data. CONCLUSIONS. A simple scoring algorithm based on an inverse hyperbolic tangent transformation of average functional reserve produces highly reliable approximations of visual ability estimated from Rasch analysis for the ADVS, NEI VFQ, VAQ, and VF-14. All four instruments measure the same visual ability variable in units that can be calibrated to a common measurement scale.

AB - PURPOSE. The primary purpose of the study is to present and test a simple algorithm for scoring visual function questionnaires (VFQs) that approximates person measure estimates from Rasch analysis, does not introduce nonlinearities at extreme scores, and is insensitive to missing data. A secondary purpose is to test the hypothesis that all VFQs measure the same visual ability variable and can be calibrated to a common measurement scale. METHODS. Each of 407 consecutively recruited low vision patients were administered two of four visual function questionnaires: Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADVS), National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ), 14-item Visual Functioning Index (VF-14), Visual Activities Questionnaire (VAQ). Separate Rasch analyses, using the Andrich rating scale model, were performed on responses to each of the four VFQs and again on the merged data of all instruments. An approximation of visual ability, based on average functional reserve and an inverse hyperbolic tangent transformation, is presented and tested by comparing visual ability estimates from the Rasch analyses to corresponding estimates from the approximations. RESULTS. Relative to person measure estimates from Rasch analysis, the approximations were observed to be linear and highly reliable (intraclass correlations ranged from 0.97 to 0.997). The measurement scale of each of the four instruments was observed to be a linear transformation of the measurement scale estimated from the merged responses of all four instruments. The approximation algorithm transforms rating scale responses for each instrument to a common measurement scale. By randomly censuring item responses for each subject, it was demonstrated that the approximation algorithm is robust and insensitive to missing data. CONCLUSIONS. A simple scoring algorithm based on an inverse hyperbolic tangent transformation of average functional reserve produces highly reliable approximations of visual ability estimated from Rasch analysis for the ADVS, NEI VFQ, VAQ, and VF-14. All four instruments measure the same visual ability variable in units that can be calibrated to a common measurement scale.

KW - Low vision

KW - Patient-centered

KW - Quality of life

KW - Rasch analysis

KW - Self-assessment

KW - Visual impairment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547923681&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547923681&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31812f5f35

DO - 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31812f5f35

M3 - Article

C2 - 17700325

AN - SCOPUS:35248837500

VL - 84

JO - Optometry and Vision Science

JF - Optometry and Vision Science

SN - 1040-5488

IS - 8

ER -