An internal clock for predictive saccades is established identically by auditory or visual information

Wilsaan M. Joiner, Jung Eun Lee, Adrian Lasker, Mark J Shelhamer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Previously we have shown that repetitive predictive saccades to alternating visual targets are mediated by an internal clock. That is, when subjects track a periodic visual stimulus alternating at a high rate (a small inter-stimulus interval, ISI, of 500 or 833 ms), they use an internal estimate of stimulus timing to pre-program the eye movement timing. Auditory pacing tones at the same rate also generate predictive saccades. It is natural to ask if an identical internal clock is used to generate the predictive saccades in each case. We hypothesized that if subjects can use auditory information to establish an internal estimate of stimulus timing-as we demonstrated can be done with visual targets-then the distributions of predictive inter-saccade intervals should demonstrate the well-known "Scalar Property" for either Auditory Cued or Visual Cued stimuli: inter-saccade interval histograms should be almost identical when each is divided by its mean. However, when making reactive saccades to a pacing stimulus (at a low rate), there should be a difference in the timing statistics between Auditory and Visual pacing, due to differences in sensory processing. We report here that the variances of inter-saccade intervals at three predictive pacing rates (ISIs of 500, 833, and 1000 ms) are equivalent, whereas the variance for Auditory Cued Pacing was greater than that for Visual Cued Pacing during reactive saccades at two reactive pacing rates (ISIs of 1667 and 2500 ms). When the inter-saccade interval histograms at the predictive pacing rates were normalized, the distributions were nearly identical for both Visual and Auditory Cued Pacing, which means that the Scalar Property holds for predictive saccades from either pacing stimulus. These results suggest that (1) an internal timing reference (clock) can be established by either auditory or visual information and (2) during predictive tracking the variability in saccade timing is due to the variability in the internal timing representation, while during reactive tracking the variability in saccade timing depends on the sensory modality used to trigger the saccades.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1645-1654
Number of pages10
JournalVision Research
Volume47
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2007

Fingerprint

Saccades
Eye Movements

Keywords

  • Auditory
  • Internal clock
  • Prediction
  • Timing
  • Visual

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

An internal clock for predictive saccades is established identically by auditory or visual information. / Joiner, Wilsaan M.; Lee, Jung Eun; Lasker, Adrian; Shelhamer, Mark J.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 47, No. 12, 06.2007, p. 1645-1654.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Joiner, Wilsaan M. ; Lee, Jung Eun ; Lasker, Adrian ; Shelhamer, Mark J. / An internal clock for predictive saccades is established identically by auditory or visual information. In: Vision Research. 2007 ; Vol. 47, No. 12. pp. 1645-1654.
@article{5e455973b90d4d1397b92e3f089671ad,
title = "An internal clock for predictive saccades is established identically by auditory or visual information",
abstract = "Previously we have shown that repetitive predictive saccades to alternating visual targets are mediated by an internal clock. That is, when subjects track a periodic visual stimulus alternating at a high rate (a small inter-stimulus interval, ISI, of 500 or 833 ms), they use an internal estimate of stimulus timing to pre-program the eye movement timing. Auditory pacing tones at the same rate also generate predictive saccades. It is natural to ask if an identical internal clock is used to generate the predictive saccades in each case. We hypothesized that if subjects can use auditory information to establish an internal estimate of stimulus timing-as we demonstrated can be done with visual targets-then the distributions of predictive inter-saccade intervals should demonstrate the well-known {"}Scalar Property{"} for either Auditory Cued or Visual Cued stimuli: inter-saccade interval histograms should be almost identical when each is divided by its mean. However, when making reactive saccades to a pacing stimulus (at a low rate), there should be a difference in the timing statistics between Auditory and Visual pacing, due to differences in sensory processing. We report here that the variances of inter-saccade intervals at three predictive pacing rates (ISIs of 500, 833, and 1000 ms) are equivalent, whereas the variance for Auditory Cued Pacing was greater than that for Visual Cued Pacing during reactive saccades at two reactive pacing rates (ISIs of 1667 and 2500 ms). When the inter-saccade interval histograms at the predictive pacing rates were normalized, the distributions were nearly identical for both Visual and Auditory Cued Pacing, which means that the Scalar Property holds for predictive saccades from either pacing stimulus. These results suggest that (1) an internal timing reference (clock) can be established by either auditory or visual information and (2) during predictive tracking the variability in saccade timing is due to the variability in the internal timing representation, while during reactive tracking the variability in saccade timing depends on the sensory modality used to trigger the saccades.",
keywords = "Auditory, Internal clock, Prediction, Timing, Visual",
author = "Joiner, {Wilsaan M.} and Lee, {Jung Eun} and Adrian Lasker and Shelhamer, {Mark J}",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.visres.2007.02.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "1645--1654",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An internal clock for predictive saccades is established identically by auditory or visual information

AU - Joiner, Wilsaan M.

AU - Lee, Jung Eun

AU - Lasker, Adrian

AU - Shelhamer, Mark J

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - Previously we have shown that repetitive predictive saccades to alternating visual targets are mediated by an internal clock. That is, when subjects track a periodic visual stimulus alternating at a high rate (a small inter-stimulus interval, ISI, of 500 or 833 ms), they use an internal estimate of stimulus timing to pre-program the eye movement timing. Auditory pacing tones at the same rate also generate predictive saccades. It is natural to ask if an identical internal clock is used to generate the predictive saccades in each case. We hypothesized that if subjects can use auditory information to establish an internal estimate of stimulus timing-as we demonstrated can be done with visual targets-then the distributions of predictive inter-saccade intervals should demonstrate the well-known "Scalar Property" for either Auditory Cued or Visual Cued stimuli: inter-saccade interval histograms should be almost identical when each is divided by its mean. However, when making reactive saccades to a pacing stimulus (at a low rate), there should be a difference in the timing statistics between Auditory and Visual pacing, due to differences in sensory processing. We report here that the variances of inter-saccade intervals at three predictive pacing rates (ISIs of 500, 833, and 1000 ms) are equivalent, whereas the variance for Auditory Cued Pacing was greater than that for Visual Cued Pacing during reactive saccades at two reactive pacing rates (ISIs of 1667 and 2500 ms). When the inter-saccade interval histograms at the predictive pacing rates were normalized, the distributions were nearly identical for both Visual and Auditory Cued Pacing, which means that the Scalar Property holds for predictive saccades from either pacing stimulus. These results suggest that (1) an internal timing reference (clock) can be established by either auditory or visual information and (2) during predictive tracking the variability in saccade timing is due to the variability in the internal timing representation, while during reactive tracking the variability in saccade timing depends on the sensory modality used to trigger the saccades.

AB - Previously we have shown that repetitive predictive saccades to alternating visual targets are mediated by an internal clock. That is, when subjects track a periodic visual stimulus alternating at a high rate (a small inter-stimulus interval, ISI, of 500 or 833 ms), they use an internal estimate of stimulus timing to pre-program the eye movement timing. Auditory pacing tones at the same rate also generate predictive saccades. It is natural to ask if an identical internal clock is used to generate the predictive saccades in each case. We hypothesized that if subjects can use auditory information to establish an internal estimate of stimulus timing-as we demonstrated can be done with visual targets-then the distributions of predictive inter-saccade intervals should demonstrate the well-known "Scalar Property" for either Auditory Cued or Visual Cued stimuli: inter-saccade interval histograms should be almost identical when each is divided by its mean. However, when making reactive saccades to a pacing stimulus (at a low rate), there should be a difference in the timing statistics between Auditory and Visual pacing, due to differences in sensory processing. We report here that the variances of inter-saccade intervals at three predictive pacing rates (ISIs of 500, 833, and 1000 ms) are equivalent, whereas the variance for Auditory Cued Pacing was greater than that for Visual Cued Pacing during reactive saccades at two reactive pacing rates (ISIs of 1667 and 2500 ms). When the inter-saccade interval histograms at the predictive pacing rates were normalized, the distributions were nearly identical for both Visual and Auditory Cued Pacing, which means that the Scalar Property holds for predictive saccades from either pacing stimulus. These results suggest that (1) an internal timing reference (clock) can be established by either auditory or visual information and (2) during predictive tracking the variability in saccade timing is due to the variability in the internal timing representation, while during reactive tracking the variability in saccade timing depends on the sensory modality used to trigger the saccades.

KW - Auditory

KW - Internal clock

KW - Prediction

KW - Timing

KW - Visual

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247874552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247874552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.visres.2007.02.013

DO - 10.1016/j.visres.2007.02.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 17445858

AN - SCOPUS:34247874552

VL - 47

SP - 1645

EP - 1654

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 12

ER -