An integrated approach for detecting embryotoxicity and developmental toxicity of environmental contaminants using in vitro alternative methods

Miguel A. Sogorb, David Pamies, Joaqui´n de Lapuente, Carmen Estevan, Jorge Este´vez, Eugenio Vilanova

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The main available alternatives for testing embryotoxicity are cellular tests with stem cells and in vitro-ex vivo tests with embryos. In cellular tests, the most developed alternative is the embryonic stem cell test, while the most developed tests involving embryos are the zebrafish and whole embryo culture test. They are technically more complex than cellular tests, but offer the advantage of determining the expectable phenotypic alteration caused by the exposure. Many efforts are currently being made, basically through proteomic and genomic approaches, in order to obtain improvements in predictivity of these tests. Development is a very complex process, and it is highly unlikely that a single alternative test can yield satisfactory performance with all types of chemicals. We propose a step-wise approach where model complexity, and consequently technical skills and economical costs, gradually increase if needed. The first level would be run short cellular assays to detect effects in early differentiation stages. The second level would involve longer cellular embryotoxicity tests to search embryotoxicants that have an effect on late differentiation stages. The third stage would consider tests with embryos because they allow the determination of hazards based on molecular and morphological alterations, and not only on differentiating cells.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)356-367
Number of pages12
JournalToxicology Letters
Volume230
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 5 2014

Fingerprint

Stem cells
Toxicity
Embryonic Structures
Impurities
Assays
Hazards
Testing
Zebrafish
Embryonic Stem Cells
Proteomics
Costs
Stem Cells
Costs and Cost Analysis
In Vitro Techniques

Keywords

  • Alternative tests
  • Embryonic stem cell test
  • Embryotoxicity
  • Teratogenicity
  • WEC
  • Zebrafish test

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Toxicology

Cite this

An integrated approach for detecting embryotoxicity and developmental toxicity of environmental contaminants using in vitro alternative methods. / Sogorb, Miguel A.; Pamies, David; de Lapuente, Joaqui´n; Estevan, Carmen; Este´vez, Jorge; Vilanova, Eugenio.

In: Toxicology Letters, Vol. 230, No. 2, 05.10.2014, p. 356-367.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sogorb, Miguel A. ; Pamies, David ; de Lapuente, Joaqui´n ; Estevan, Carmen ; Este´vez, Jorge ; Vilanova, Eugenio. / An integrated approach for detecting embryotoxicity and developmental toxicity of environmental contaminants using in vitro alternative methods. In: Toxicology Letters. 2014 ; Vol. 230, No. 2. pp. 356-367.
@article{bf9cb35a9ce346d6a623a269b5ea17b8,
title = "An integrated approach for detecting embryotoxicity and developmental toxicity of environmental contaminants using in vitro alternative methods",
abstract = "The main available alternatives for testing embryotoxicity are cellular tests with stem cells and in vitro-ex vivo tests with embryos. In cellular tests, the most developed alternative is the embryonic stem cell test, while the most developed tests involving embryos are the zebrafish and whole embryo culture test. They are technically more complex than cellular tests, but offer the advantage of determining the expectable phenotypic alteration caused by the exposure. Many efforts are currently being made, basically through proteomic and genomic approaches, in order to obtain improvements in predictivity of these tests. Development is a very complex process, and it is highly unlikely that a single alternative test can yield satisfactory performance with all types of chemicals. We propose a step-wise approach where model complexity, and consequently technical skills and economical costs, gradually increase if needed. The first level would be run short cellular assays to detect effects in early differentiation stages. The second level would involve longer cellular embryotoxicity tests to search embryotoxicants that have an effect on late differentiation stages. The third stage would consider tests with embryos because they allow the determination of hazards based on molecular and morphological alterations, and not only on differentiating cells.",
keywords = "Alternative tests, Embryonic stem cell test, Embryotoxicity, Teratogenicity, WEC, Zebrafish test",
author = "Sogorb, {Miguel A.} and David Pamies and {de Lapuente}, Joaqui´n and Carmen Estevan and Jorge Este´vez and Eugenio Vilanova",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.01.037",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "230",
pages = "356--367",
journal = "Toxicology Letters",
issn = "0378-4274",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An integrated approach for detecting embryotoxicity and developmental toxicity of environmental contaminants using in vitro alternative methods

AU - Sogorb, Miguel A.

AU - Pamies, David

AU - de Lapuente, Joaqui´n

AU - Estevan, Carmen

AU - Este´vez, Jorge

AU - Vilanova, Eugenio

PY - 2014/10/5

Y1 - 2014/10/5

N2 - The main available alternatives for testing embryotoxicity are cellular tests with stem cells and in vitro-ex vivo tests with embryos. In cellular tests, the most developed alternative is the embryonic stem cell test, while the most developed tests involving embryos are the zebrafish and whole embryo culture test. They are technically more complex than cellular tests, but offer the advantage of determining the expectable phenotypic alteration caused by the exposure. Many efforts are currently being made, basically through proteomic and genomic approaches, in order to obtain improvements in predictivity of these tests. Development is a very complex process, and it is highly unlikely that a single alternative test can yield satisfactory performance with all types of chemicals. We propose a step-wise approach where model complexity, and consequently technical skills and economical costs, gradually increase if needed. The first level would be run short cellular assays to detect effects in early differentiation stages. The second level would involve longer cellular embryotoxicity tests to search embryotoxicants that have an effect on late differentiation stages. The third stage would consider tests with embryos because they allow the determination of hazards based on molecular and morphological alterations, and not only on differentiating cells.

AB - The main available alternatives for testing embryotoxicity are cellular tests with stem cells and in vitro-ex vivo tests with embryos. In cellular tests, the most developed alternative is the embryonic stem cell test, while the most developed tests involving embryos are the zebrafish and whole embryo culture test. They are technically more complex than cellular tests, but offer the advantage of determining the expectable phenotypic alteration caused by the exposure. Many efforts are currently being made, basically through proteomic and genomic approaches, in order to obtain improvements in predictivity of these tests. Development is a very complex process, and it is highly unlikely that a single alternative test can yield satisfactory performance with all types of chemicals. We propose a step-wise approach where model complexity, and consequently technical skills and economical costs, gradually increase if needed. The first level would be run short cellular assays to detect effects in early differentiation stages. The second level would involve longer cellular embryotoxicity tests to search embryotoxicants that have an effect on late differentiation stages. The third stage would consider tests with embryos because they allow the determination of hazards based on molecular and morphological alterations, and not only on differentiating cells.

KW - Alternative tests

KW - Embryonic stem cell test

KW - Embryotoxicity

KW - Teratogenicity

KW - WEC

KW - Zebrafish test

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907176470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907176470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.01.037

DO - 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.01.037

M3 - Article

C2 - 24503011

AN - SCOPUS:84907176470

VL - 230

SP - 356

EP - 367

JO - Toxicology Letters

JF - Toxicology Letters

SN - 0378-4274

IS - 2

ER -