An expository review of two methods of calculating the paternity probability

C. C. Li, A. Chakravarti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There are two methods for calculating the posttests probability of paternity, viz., the nonexclusion probability method (Ē method) and the paternity index method (λ method). This report reviews these two methods and explains the reasons behind them, in the hope that it might alleviate the current controversy between the advocates of these two methods. The emphasis throughout the paper is on exposition, using simple examples to illustrate certain principles or properties. A discussion follows the presentation of the two methods. The calculation of the paternity index is based on the genotype (or phenotype) of the accused man; and the value of the paternity index remains the same whether the accusation itself is true or false.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)197-205
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Human Genetics
Volume43
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1988
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Paternity
Genotype
Phenotype

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics

Cite this

An expository review of two methods of calculating the paternity probability. / Li, C. C.; Chakravarti, A.

In: American Journal of Human Genetics, Vol. 43, No. 2, 1988, p. 197-205.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2965fdfd3ad1432899991e2c024bbf7a,
title = "An expository review of two methods of calculating the paternity probability",
abstract = "There are two methods for calculating the posttests probability of paternity, viz., the nonexclusion probability method (Ē method) and the paternity index method (λ method). This report reviews these two methods and explains the reasons behind them, in the hope that it might alleviate the current controversy between the advocates of these two methods. The emphasis throughout the paper is on exposition, using simple examples to illustrate certain principles or properties. A discussion follows the presentation of the two methods. The calculation of the paternity index is based on the genotype (or phenotype) of the accused man; and the value of the paternity index remains the same whether the accusation itself is true or false.",
author = "Li, {C. C.} and A. Chakravarti",
year = "1988",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "197--205",
journal = "American Journal of Human Genetics",
issn = "0002-9297",
publisher = "Cell Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An expository review of two methods of calculating the paternity probability

AU - Li, C. C.

AU - Chakravarti, A.

PY - 1988

Y1 - 1988

N2 - There are two methods for calculating the posttests probability of paternity, viz., the nonexclusion probability method (Ē method) and the paternity index method (λ method). This report reviews these two methods and explains the reasons behind them, in the hope that it might alleviate the current controversy between the advocates of these two methods. The emphasis throughout the paper is on exposition, using simple examples to illustrate certain principles or properties. A discussion follows the presentation of the two methods. The calculation of the paternity index is based on the genotype (or phenotype) of the accused man; and the value of the paternity index remains the same whether the accusation itself is true or false.

AB - There are two methods for calculating the posttests probability of paternity, viz., the nonexclusion probability method (Ē method) and the paternity index method (λ method). This report reviews these two methods and explains the reasons behind them, in the hope that it might alleviate the current controversy between the advocates of these two methods. The emphasis throughout the paper is on exposition, using simple examples to illustrate certain principles or properties. A discussion follows the presentation of the two methods. The calculation of the paternity index is based on the genotype (or phenotype) of the accused man; and the value of the paternity index remains the same whether the accusation itself is true or false.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023766832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023766832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3400645

AN - SCOPUS:0023766832

VL - 43

SP - 197

EP - 205

JO - American Journal of Human Genetics

JF - American Journal of Human Genetics

SN - 0002-9297

IS - 2

ER -