An experimental comparison of conclusion-drawing by the communicator and by the audience

Carl I. Hovland, Wallace Mandell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

85 Scopus citations

Abstract

"The effects upon opinion change of having the communicator draw the appropriate conclusion from material he had presented were compared with those produced when the drawing of the conclusion was left to the audience . . .. Over twice as many S's changed their opinions in the direction of the position advocated by the communicator when the speaker drew the appropriate conclusion than when the drawing of the conclusion was left to the audience." This relationship was studied as a function of the interacting variables: (1) confidence in the communicator, (2) intellectual ability, and (2) personality traits possessed by members of the audience. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)581-588
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
Volume47
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1952
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • AUDIENCE CONCLUSIONS
  • AUDIENCE, CONCLUSIONS, SPEAKER INFLUENCE
  • COMMUNICATION
  • COMMUNICATION, SPEAKER &
  • LANGUAGE &

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An experimental comparison of conclusion-drawing by the communicator and by the audience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this