An evaluation of unmediated versus mediated retrieval services.

James D. Buntrock, Christopher Chute

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

To understand if unmediated services could serve the data retrieval needs for the Mayo research investigator, a study was conducted to determine researcher interest, ability, and outcome of using a clinical data retrieval system. The results indicate about 25% of the research investigators would use a self-service retrieval tool. However, there is clear evidence a majority of the research investigators are satisfied with and prefer the mediated service because of convenience, retrieval specialist knowledge, and lack of time to perform the search themselves. Approximately 61% of the non-participants indicated they would be willing to pay a fee for continued use of the mediated service. This study confirms the interest in self-service retrieval tools, but the actual interest is lower than anticipated. The recommendation is to continue the use of mediated services and to offer self-service methods as needed, allowing the most options to the research investigator.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)81-85
Number of pages5
JournalProceedings / AMIA ... Annual Symposium. AMIA Symposium
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Research Personnel
Information Storage and Retrieval
Research
Fees and Charges
Information Systems

Cite this

An evaluation of unmediated versus mediated retrieval services. / Buntrock, James D.; Chute, Christopher.

In: Proceedings / AMIA ... Annual Symposium. AMIA Symposium, 2002, p. 81-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{93d9bee25711457ba5ec6d5da3b90d67,
title = "An evaluation of unmediated versus mediated retrieval services.",
abstract = "To understand if unmediated services could serve the data retrieval needs for the Mayo research investigator, a study was conducted to determine researcher interest, ability, and outcome of using a clinical data retrieval system. The results indicate about 25{\%} of the research investigators would use a self-service retrieval tool. However, there is clear evidence a majority of the research investigators are satisfied with and prefer the mediated service because of convenience, retrieval specialist knowledge, and lack of time to perform the search themselves. Approximately 61{\%} of the non-participants indicated they would be willing to pay a fee for continued use of the mediated service. This study confirms the interest in self-service retrieval tools, but the actual interest is lower than anticipated. The recommendation is to continue the use of mediated services and to offer self-service methods as needed, allowing the most options to the research investigator.",
author = "Buntrock, {James D.} and Christopher Chute",
year = "2002",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "81--85",
journal = "Proceedings / AMIA . Annual Symposium. AMIA Symposium",
issn = "1531-605X",
publisher = "Hanley & Belfus",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An evaluation of unmediated versus mediated retrieval services.

AU - Buntrock, James D.

AU - Chute, Christopher

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - To understand if unmediated services could serve the data retrieval needs for the Mayo research investigator, a study was conducted to determine researcher interest, ability, and outcome of using a clinical data retrieval system. The results indicate about 25% of the research investigators would use a self-service retrieval tool. However, there is clear evidence a majority of the research investigators are satisfied with and prefer the mediated service because of convenience, retrieval specialist knowledge, and lack of time to perform the search themselves. Approximately 61% of the non-participants indicated they would be willing to pay a fee for continued use of the mediated service. This study confirms the interest in self-service retrieval tools, but the actual interest is lower than anticipated. The recommendation is to continue the use of mediated services and to offer self-service methods as needed, allowing the most options to the research investigator.

AB - To understand if unmediated services could serve the data retrieval needs for the Mayo research investigator, a study was conducted to determine researcher interest, ability, and outcome of using a clinical data retrieval system. The results indicate about 25% of the research investigators would use a self-service retrieval tool. However, there is clear evidence a majority of the research investigators are satisfied with and prefer the mediated service because of convenience, retrieval specialist knowledge, and lack of time to perform the search themselves. Approximately 61% of the non-participants indicated they would be willing to pay a fee for continued use of the mediated service. This study confirms the interest in self-service retrieval tools, but the actual interest is lower than anticipated. The recommendation is to continue the use of mediated services and to offer self-service methods as needed, allowing the most options to the research investigator.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036362909&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036362909&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12463791

AN - SCOPUS:0036362909

SP - 81

EP - 85

JO - Proceedings / AMIA . Annual Symposium. AMIA Symposium

JF - Proceedings / AMIA . Annual Symposium. AMIA Symposium

SN - 1531-605X

ER -