An Evaluation of Two Dating Violence Prevention Programs on a College Campus

Kerry Peterson, Phyllis W Sharps, Victoria Banyard, Ráchael A. Powers, Catherine Kaukinen, Deborah Ann Gross, Michele R Decker, Carrie Baatz, Jacquelyn C Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Dating violence is a serious and prevalent public health problem that is associated with numerous negative physical and psychological health outcomes, and yet there has been limited evaluation of prevention programs on college campuses. A recent innovation in campus prevention focuses on mobilizing bystanders to take action. To date, bystander programs have mainly been compared with no treatment control groups raising questions about what value is added to dating violence prevention by focusing on bystanders. This study compared a single 90-min bystander education program for dating violence prevention with a traditional awareness education program, as well as with a no education control group. Using a quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test design with follow-up at 2 months, a sample of predominately freshmen college students was randomized to either the bystander (n = 369) or traditional awareness (n = 376) dating violence education program. A non-randomized control group of freshmen students who did not receive any education were also surveyed (n = 224). Students completed measures of attitudes, including rape myth acceptance, bystander efficacy, and intent to help as well as behavioral measures related to bystander action and victimization. Results showed that the bystander education program was more effective at changing attitudes, beliefs, efficacy, intentions, and self-reported behaviors compared with the traditional awareness education program. Both programs were significantly more effective than no education. The findings of this study have important implications for future dating violence prevention educational programming, emphasizing the value of bystander education programs for primary dating violence prevention among college students.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3630-3655
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Interpersonal Violence
Volume33
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Education
Students
Control Groups
Intimate Partner Violence
Crime Victims
Rape
Program Evaluation
Public Health
Psychology
Health

Keywords

  • bystander intervention
  • college students
  • dating violence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

An Evaluation of Two Dating Violence Prevention Programs on a College Campus. / Peterson, Kerry; Sharps, Phyllis W; Banyard, Victoria; Powers, Ráchael A.; Kaukinen, Catherine; Gross, Deborah Ann; Decker, Michele R; Baatz, Carrie; Campbell, Jacquelyn C.

In: Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 33, No. 23, 01.12.2018, p. 3630-3655.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Peterson, Kerry ; Sharps, Phyllis W ; Banyard, Victoria ; Powers, Ráchael A. ; Kaukinen, Catherine ; Gross, Deborah Ann ; Decker, Michele R ; Baatz, Carrie ; Campbell, Jacquelyn C. / An Evaluation of Two Dating Violence Prevention Programs on a College Campus. In: Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2018 ; Vol. 33, No. 23. pp. 3630-3655.
@article{8574281d22ed4f2f9c6f7a1e0807fe6e,
title = "An Evaluation of Two Dating Violence Prevention Programs on a College Campus",
abstract = "Dating violence is a serious and prevalent public health problem that is associated with numerous negative physical and psychological health outcomes, and yet there has been limited evaluation of prevention programs on college campuses. A recent innovation in campus prevention focuses on mobilizing bystanders to take action. To date, bystander programs have mainly been compared with no treatment control groups raising questions about what value is added to dating violence prevention by focusing on bystanders. This study compared a single 90-min bystander education program for dating violence prevention with a traditional awareness education program, as well as with a no education control group. Using a quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test design with follow-up at 2 months, a sample of predominately freshmen college students was randomized to either the bystander (n = 369) or traditional awareness (n = 376) dating violence education program. A non-randomized control group of freshmen students who did not receive any education were also surveyed (n = 224). Students completed measures of attitudes, including rape myth acceptance, bystander efficacy, and intent to help as well as behavioral measures related to bystander action and victimization. Results showed that the bystander education program was more effective at changing attitudes, beliefs, efficacy, intentions, and self-reported behaviors compared with the traditional awareness education program. Both programs were significantly more effective than no education. The findings of this study have important implications for future dating violence prevention educational programming, emphasizing the value of bystander education programs for primary dating violence prevention among college students.",
keywords = "bystander intervention, college students, dating violence",
author = "Kerry Peterson and Sharps, {Phyllis W} and Victoria Banyard and Powers, {R{\'a}chael A.} and Catherine Kaukinen and Gross, {Deborah Ann} and Decker, {Michele R} and Carrie Baatz and Campbell, {Jacquelyn C}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0886260516636069",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "3630--3655",
journal = "Journal of Interpersonal Violence",
issn = "0886-2605",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "23",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Evaluation of Two Dating Violence Prevention Programs on a College Campus

AU - Peterson, Kerry

AU - Sharps, Phyllis W

AU - Banyard, Victoria

AU - Powers, Ráchael A.

AU - Kaukinen, Catherine

AU - Gross, Deborah Ann

AU - Decker, Michele R

AU - Baatz, Carrie

AU - Campbell, Jacquelyn C

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Dating violence is a serious and prevalent public health problem that is associated with numerous negative physical and psychological health outcomes, and yet there has been limited evaluation of prevention programs on college campuses. A recent innovation in campus prevention focuses on mobilizing bystanders to take action. To date, bystander programs have mainly been compared with no treatment control groups raising questions about what value is added to dating violence prevention by focusing on bystanders. This study compared a single 90-min bystander education program for dating violence prevention with a traditional awareness education program, as well as with a no education control group. Using a quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test design with follow-up at 2 months, a sample of predominately freshmen college students was randomized to either the bystander (n = 369) or traditional awareness (n = 376) dating violence education program. A non-randomized control group of freshmen students who did not receive any education were also surveyed (n = 224). Students completed measures of attitudes, including rape myth acceptance, bystander efficacy, and intent to help as well as behavioral measures related to bystander action and victimization. Results showed that the bystander education program was more effective at changing attitudes, beliefs, efficacy, intentions, and self-reported behaviors compared with the traditional awareness education program. Both programs were significantly more effective than no education. The findings of this study have important implications for future dating violence prevention educational programming, emphasizing the value of bystander education programs for primary dating violence prevention among college students.

AB - Dating violence is a serious and prevalent public health problem that is associated with numerous negative physical and psychological health outcomes, and yet there has been limited evaluation of prevention programs on college campuses. A recent innovation in campus prevention focuses on mobilizing bystanders to take action. To date, bystander programs have mainly been compared with no treatment control groups raising questions about what value is added to dating violence prevention by focusing on bystanders. This study compared a single 90-min bystander education program for dating violence prevention with a traditional awareness education program, as well as with a no education control group. Using a quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test design with follow-up at 2 months, a sample of predominately freshmen college students was randomized to either the bystander (n = 369) or traditional awareness (n = 376) dating violence education program. A non-randomized control group of freshmen students who did not receive any education were also surveyed (n = 224). Students completed measures of attitudes, including rape myth acceptance, bystander efficacy, and intent to help as well as behavioral measures related to bystander action and victimization. Results showed that the bystander education program was more effective at changing attitudes, beliefs, efficacy, intentions, and self-reported behaviors compared with the traditional awareness education program. Both programs were significantly more effective than no education. The findings of this study have important implications for future dating violence prevention educational programming, emphasizing the value of bystander education programs for primary dating violence prevention among college students.

KW - bystander intervention

KW - college students

KW - dating violence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055142876&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055142876&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0886260516636069

DO - 10.1177/0886260516636069

M3 - Article

C2 - 26976433

AN - SCOPUS:85055142876

VL - 33

SP - 3630

EP - 3655

JO - Journal of Interpersonal Violence

JF - Journal of Interpersonal Violence

SN - 0886-2605

IS - 23

ER -