An Efficient Method for Psychosocial Screening of Cancer Patients

James R. Zabora; Rebecca Smith-Wilson; John H. Fetting; John P. Enterline

doi:10.1016/S0033-3182(90)72194-9

An Efficient Method for Psychosocial Screening of Cancer Patients

James R. Zabora, Rebecca Smith-Wilson, John H. Fetting, John P. Enterline

School of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

In high-volume outpatient areas, using Weisman and Worden’ s Omega instruments for psychosocial screening of cancer patients is not feasible. This study of 30 newly diagnosed patients compared the accuracy of the Omega instruments and the Brief Symptom inventory (BSI) in identifying patients with high levels of distress at tile time of diagtiosis as well as in predicting future distress. A significant level of agreement was found hetweet? the BSI and the Omega instruments. Both instruments correctly identified the future distress of 16 of 19 patients (84.2%), but the BSI screens patients in one-fourth tile time and at one-third the cost. These results support our decision to employ the BSI as a screening tool in an outpatient setting.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	192-196
Number of pages	5
Journal	Psychosomatics
Volume	31
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3182(90)72194-9
State	Published - Jan 1 1990

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Applied Psychology
Psychiatry and Mental health

Access to Document

10.1016/S0033-3182(90)72194-9

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'An Efficient Method for Psychosocial Screening of Cancer Patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{ded28eace2a644aa81667cf32088f320,

title = "An Efficient Method for Psychosocial Screening of Cancer Patients",

abstract = "In high-volume outpatient areas, using Weisman and Worden{\textquoteright} s Omega instruments for psychosocial screening of cancer patients is not feasible. This study of 30 newly diagnosed patients compared the accuracy of the Omega instruments and the Brief Symptom inventory (BSI) in identifying patients with high levels of distress at tile time of diagtiosis as well as in predicting future distress. A significant level of agreement was found hetweet? the BSI and the Omega instruments. Both instruments correctly identified the future distress of 16 of 19 patients (84.2%), but the BSI screens patients in one-fourth tile time and at one-third the cost. These results support our decision to employ the BSI as a screening tool in an outpatient setting.",

author = "Zabora, {James R.} and Rebecca Smith-Wilson and Fetting, {John H.} and Enterline, {John P.}",

year = "1990",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/S0033-3182(90)72194-9",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "31",

pages = "192--196",

journal = "Psychosomatics",

issn = "0033-3182",

publisher = "American Psychiatric Publishing Inc.",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Efficient Method for Psychosocial Screening of Cancer Patients

AU - Zabora, James R.

AU - Smith-Wilson, Rebecca

AU - Fetting, John H.

AU - Enterline, John P.

PY - 1990/1/1

Y1 - 1990/1/1

N2 - In high-volume outpatient areas, using Weisman and Worden’ s Omega instruments for psychosocial screening of cancer patients is not feasible. This study of 30 newly diagnosed patients compared the accuracy of the Omega instruments and the Brief Symptom inventory (BSI) in identifying patients with high levels of distress at tile time of diagtiosis as well as in predicting future distress. A significant level of agreement was found hetweet? the BSI and the Omega instruments. Both instruments correctly identified the future distress of 16 of 19 patients (84.2%), but the BSI screens patients in one-fourth tile time and at one-third the cost. These results support our decision to employ the BSI as a screening tool in an outpatient setting.

AB - In high-volume outpatient areas, using Weisman and Worden’ s Omega instruments for psychosocial screening of cancer patients is not feasible. This study of 30 newly diagnosed patients compared the accuracy of the Omega instruments and the Brief Symptom inventory (BSI) in identifying patients with high levels of distress at tile time of diagtiosis as well as in predicting future distress. A significant level of agreement was found hetweet? the BSI and the Omega instruments. Both instruments correctly identified the future distress of 16 of 19 patients (84.2%), but the BSI screens patients in one-fourth tile time and at one-third the cost. These results support our decision to employ the BSI as a screening tool in an outpatient setting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025351385&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025351385&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0033-3182(90)72194-9

DO - 10.1016/S0033-3182(90)72194-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 2330401

AN - SCOPUS:0025351385

VL - 31

SP - 192

EP - 196

JO - Psychosomatics

JF - Psychosomatics

SN - 0033-3182

IS - 2

ER -