An assessment of the shared-decision model in parents of children with acute otitis media

Dan Merenstein, Marie Diener-West, Alex Krist, Matthew Pinneger, Lisa A Cooper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective. Medicine is shifting from a doctor-centered approach to a model entailing more shared decision-making. Many organizations now recommend a shared-decision approach to treating children with acute otitis media (AOM). Our primary objectives in this study were to assess (1) which style of decision-making on the physician's part would most effectively reduce parents' proclivity to use antibiotics for treatment of their child's AOM and (2) parental satisfaction with different doctor-patient decision-making styles. Methods. We conducted a cross-sectional survey to examine how parents respond to doctor-patient communication styles in 3 clinical vignettes that presented 2 versions of a shared-decision model (SDM) and 1 paternalistic model. Parents were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 vignettes. The main predictor variable was the vignette assignment, and the main outcomes were (1) parent proclivity to use antibiotics and (2) parent ratings of care by the physician in the vignette. Using logistic regression, we adjusted for caregivers' age, gender, income, knowledge of antibiotics, decision-making preference, confidence in physician, and length of relationship with personal physician. Results. Four hundred sixty-six parents met inclusion criteria, with a response rate of 94%. General characteristics were similar across vignette assignment groups. Parents who received the paternalistic-model vignettes were more likely to say that they would use antibiotics than those who received the SDM vignettes (odds ratio: 4.9; 95% confidence interval: 2.3-10.6). This result remained statistically significant after adjustment for potential confounders. In addition, parents in the shareddecision groups were more satisfied (93% and 84%) than those in the paternalistic-model group (76%). Conclusions. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine parent interest, acceptance, and satisfaction with the SDM. Our findings suggest that shared decision-making for AOM may lead to less antibiotic usage and higher levels of parental satisfaction. Although more studies are needed to examine how best to incorporate parents in the SDM, our study serves as an example of the potential benefit of this approach in pediatric medicine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1267-1275
Number of pages9
JournalPediatrics
Volume116
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2005

Fingerprint

Otitis Media
Parents
Decision Making
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Physicians
Medicine
Caregivers
Cross-Sectional Studies
Logistic Models
Odds Ratio
Communication
Organizations
Confidence Intervals
Pediatrics

Keywords

  • Acute otitis media
  • Doctor-patient communication
  • Patient-centered care
  • Shared decision-making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

An assessment of the shared-decision model in parents of children with acute otitis media. / Merenstein, Dan; Diener-West, Marie; Krist, Alex; Pinneger, Matthew; Cooper, Lisa A.

In: Pediatrics, Vol. 116, No. 6, 12.2005, p. 1267-1275.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Merenstein, Dan ; Diener-West, Marie ; Krist, Alex ; Pinneger, Matthew ; Cooper, Lisa A. / An assessment of the shared-decision model in parents of children with acute otitis media. In: Pediatrics. 2005 ; Vol. 116, No. 6. pp. 1267-1275.
@article{d1aa2e43ce52462d8863d297901416f4,
title = "An assessment of the shared-decision model in parents of children with acute otitis media",
abstract = "Objective. Medicine is shifting from a doctor-centered approach to a model entailing more shared decision-making. Many organizations now recommend a shared-decision approach to treating children with acute otitis media (AOM). Our primary objectives in this study were to assess (1) which style of decision-making on the physician's part would most effectively reduce parents' proclivity to use antibiotics for treatment of their child's AOM and (2) parental satisfaction with different doctor-patient decision-making styles. Methods. We conducted a cross-sectional survey to examine how parents respond to doctor-patient communication styles in 3 clinical vignettes that presented 2 versions of a shared-decision model (SDM) and 1 paternalistic model. Parents were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 vignettes. The main predictor variable was the vignette assignment, and the main outcomes were (1) parent proclivity to use antibiotics and (2) parent ratings of care by the physician in the vignette. Using logistic regression, we adjusted for caregivers' age, gender, income, knowledge of antibiotics, decision-making preference, confidence in physician, and length of relationship with personal physician. Results. Four hundred sixty-six parents met inclusion criteria, with a response rate of 94{\%}. General characteristics were similar across vignette assignment groups. Parents who received the paternalistic-model vignettes were more likely to say that they would use antibiotics than those who received the SDM vignettes (odds ratio: 4.9; 95{\%} confidence interval: 2.3-10.6). This result remained statistically significant after adjustment for potential confounders. In addition, parents in the shareddecision groups were more satisfied (93{\%} and 84{\%}) than those in the paternalistic-model group (76{\%}). Conclusions. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine parent interest, acceptance, and satisfaction with the SDM. Our findings suggest that shared decision-making for AOM may lead to less antibiotic usage and higher levels of parental satisfaction. Although more studies are needed to examine how best to incorporate parents in the SDM, our study serves as an example of the potential benefit of this approach in pediatric medicine.",
keywords = "Acute otitis media, Doctor-patient communication, Patient-centered care, Shared decision-making",
author = "Dan Merenstein and Marie Diener-West and Alex Krist and Matthew Pinneger and Cooper, {Lisa A}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1542/peds.2005-0486",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "116",
pages = "1267--1275",
journal = "Pediatrics",
issn = "0031-4005",
publisher = "American Academy of Pediatrics",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An assessment of the shared-decision model in parents of children with acute otitis media

AU - Merenstein, Dan

AU - Diener-West, Marie

AU - Krist, Alex

AU - Pinneger, Matthew

AU - Cooper, Lisa A

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - Objective. Medicine is shifting from a doctor-centered approach to a model entailing more shared decision-making. Many organizations now recommend a shared-decision approach to treating children with acute otitis media (AOM). Our primary objectives in this study were to assess (1) which style of decision-making on the physician's part would most effectively reduce parents' proclivity to use antibiotics for treatment of their child's AOM and (2) parental satisfaction with different doctor-patient decision-making styles. Methods. We conducted a cross-sectional survey to examine how parents respond to doctor-patient communication styles in 3 clinical vignettes that presented 2 versions of a shared-decision model (SDM) and 1 paternalistic model. Parents were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 vignettes. The main predictor variable was the vignette assignment, and the main outcomes were (1) parent proclivity to use antibiotics and (2) parent ratings of care by the physician in the vignette. Using logistic regression, we adjusted for caregivers' age, gender, income, knowledge of antibiotics, decision-making preference, confidence in physician, and length of relationship with personal physician. Results. Four hundred sixty-six parents met inclusion criteria, with a response rate of 94%. General characteristics were similar across vignette assignment groups. Parents who received the paternalistic-model vignettes were more likely to say that they would use antibiotics than those who received the SDM vignettes (odds ratio: 4.9; 95% confidence interval: 2.3-10.6). This result remained statistically significant after adjustment for potential confounders. In addition, parents in the shareddecision groups were more satisfied (93% and 84%) than those in the paternalistic-model group (76%). Conclusions. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine parent interest, acceptance, and satisfaction with the SDM. Our findings suggest that shared decision-making for AOM may lead to less antibiotic usage and higher levels of parental satisfaction. Although more studies are needed to examine how best to incorporate parents in the SDM, our study serves as an example of the potential benefit of this approach in pediatric medicine.

AB - Objective. Medicine is shifting from a doctor-centered approach to a model entailing more shared decision-making. Many organizations now recommend a shared-decision approach to treating children with acute otitis media (AOM). Our primary objectives in this study were to assess (1) which style of decision-making on the physician's part would most effectively reduce parents' proclivity to use antibiotics for treatment of their child's AOM and (2) parental satisfaction with different doctor-patient decision-making styles. Methods. We conducted a cross-sectional survey to examine how parents respond to doctor-patient communication styles in 3 clinical vignettes that presented 2 versions of a shared-decision model (SDM) and 1 paternalistic model. Parents were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 vignettes. The main predictor variable was the vignette assignment, and the main outcomes were (1) parent proclivity to use antibiotics and (2) parent ratings of care by the physician in the vignette. Using logistic regression, we adjusted for caregivers' age, gender, income, knowledge of antibiotics, decision-making preference, confidence in physician, and length of relationship with personal physician. Results. Four hundred sixty-six parents met inclusion criteria, with a response rate of 94%. General characteristics were similar across vignette assignment groups. Parents who received the paternalistic-model vignettes were more likely to say that they would use antibiotics than those who received the SDM vignettes (odds ratio: 4.9; 95% confidence interval: 2.3-10.6). This result remained statistically significant after adjustment for potential confounders. In addition, parents in the shareddecision groups were more satisfied (93% and 84%) than those in the paternalistic-model group (76%). Conclusions. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine parent interest, acceptance, and satisfaction with the SDM. Our findings suggest that shared decision-making for AOM may lead to less antibiotic usage and higher levels of parental satisfaction. Although more studies are needed to examine how best to incorporate parents in the SDM, our study serves as an example of the potential benefit of this approach in pediatric medicine.

KW - Acute otitis media

KW - Doctor-patient communication

KW - Patient-centered care

KW - Shared decision-making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644610731&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644610731&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1542/peds.2005-0486

DO - 10.1542/peds.2005-0486

M3 - Article

C2 - 16322146

AN - SCOPUS:33644610731

VL - 116

SP - 1267

EP - 1275

JO - Pediatrics

JF - Pediatrics

SN - 0031-4005

IS - 6

ER -