An analysis of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination rehabilitation section

Addisu Mesfin, Payam Farjoodi, Yetsa A. Tuakli-Wosornu, Alan Y. Yan, Mesfin A. Lemma, Dawn Mitzner Laporte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: One subject tested by the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) is rehabilitation. Our purpose was to analyze the OITE's rehabilitation section to (1) identify the rehabilitation subjects that are tested, (2) evaluate trainee performance on this section, and (3) evaluate the literature cited for this section as an aide to the trainee preparation for future OITE examinations. Design: This study included OITE examinations from 2004 through 2009. The rehabilitation sections of these examinations were analyzed for content, type of questions asked (taxonomy 1: direct recall; taxonomy 2: diagnosis; taxonomy 3: evaluation/decision making and development of a treatment plan), and literature cited. The mean score in the rehabilitation section of the OITE from 2004 to 2009 was also evaluated, and literature citations were tabulated. Setting: Orthopaedic surgery residency. Results: In the 2004-2009 OITE examinations, a total of 1619 questions were administered, of which 53 (3.3%) related to rehabilitation. The most common rehabilitation questions assessed knowledge of prosthetic/orthotics (20.8%) and neuro-orthopedics (20.8%). Other questions addressed amputation (18.9%), physical therapy treatment and outcomes (18.9%), rehabilitation terminology (9.4%), and spinal cord injury (7.7%). Most frequently, the questions evaluated the trainee's direct recall of the subject (51%), evaluation/decision making and development of a treatment plan (30.1%), and diagnosis (18.9%). The mean score in the rehabilitation section of the OITE from 2004 through 2009 was 54.1% (range, 40% to 77.8%). A total of 53 references was used. The 3 most common references were the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume (10), Orthopaedic Knowledge Update (volumes 7 through 9) (8), and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (7). Conclusion: To our knowledge, our study is the first to analyze the rehabilitation section of the OITE. Our results will help the trainee prepare for the examination by focusing on the appropriate content and literature.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)286-291
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Surgical Education
Volume69
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2012

Fingerprint

Orthopedics
rehabilitation
Rehabilitation
examination
trainee
taxonomy
surgery
Decision Making
decision making
Internship and Residency
Spinal Cord Injuries
Amputation
Terminology
evaluation
technical language
Therapeutics
Joints
Bone and Bones
literature

Keywords

  • analysis
  • orthopaedic in-training examination (OITE)
  • rehabilitation
  • residents

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Education

Cite this

An analysis of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination rehabilitation section. / Mesfin, Addisu; Farjoodi, Payam; Tuakli-Wosornu, Yetsa A.; Yan, Alan Y.; Lemma, Mesfin A.; Laporte, Dawn Mitzner.

In: Journal of Surgical Education, Vol. 69, No. 3, 05.2012, p. 286-291.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mesfin, Addisu ; Farjoodi, Payam ; Tuakli-Wosornu, Yetsa A. ; Yan, Alan Y. ; Lemma, Mesfin A. ; Laporte, Dawn Mitzner. / An analysis of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination rehabilitation section. In: Journal of Surgical Education. 2012 ; Vol. 69, No. 3. pp. 286-291.
@article{d0c3b6c785e8434caeea7afae941fccc,
title = "An analysis of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination rehabilitation section",
abstract = "Objective: One subject tested by the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) is rehabilitation. Our purpose was to analyze the OITE's rehabilitation section to (1) identify the rehabilitation subjects that are tested, (2) evaluate trainee performance on this section, and (3) evaluate the literature cited for this section as an aide to the trainee preparation for future OITE examinations. Design: This study included OITE examinations from 2004 through 2009. The rehabilitation sections of these examinations were analyzed for content, type of questions asked (taxonomy 1: direct recall; taxonomy 2: diagnosis; taxonomy 3: evaluation/decision making and development of a treatment plan), and literature cited. The mean score in the rehabilitation section of the OITE from 2004 to 2009 was also evaluated, and literature citations were tabulated. Setting: Orthopaedic surgery residency. Results: In the 2004-2009 OITE examinations, a total of 1619 questions were administered, of which 53 (3.3{\%}) related to rehabilitation. The most common rehabilitation questions assessed knowledge of prosthetic/orthotics (20.8{\%}) and neuro-orthopedics (20.8{\%}). Other questions addressed amputation (18.9{\%}), physical therapy treatment and outcomes (18.9{\%}), rehabilitation terminology (9.4{\%}), and spinal cord injury (7.7{\%}). Most frequently, the questions evaluated the trainee's direct recall of the subject (51{\%}), evaluation/decision making and development of a treatment plan (30.1{\%}), and diagnosis (18.9{\%}). The mean score in the rehabilitation section of the OITE from 2004 through 2009 was 54.1{\%} (range, 40{\%} to 77.8{\%}). A total of 53 references was used. The 3 most common references were the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume (10), Orthopaedic Knowledge Update (volumes 7 through 9) (8), and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (7). Conclusion: To our knowledge, our study is the first to analyze the rehabilitation section of the OITE. Our results will help the trainee prepare for the examination by focusing on the appropriate content and literature.",
keywords = "analysis, orthopaedic in-training examination (OITE), rehabilitation, residents",
author = "Addisu Mesfin and Payam Farjoodi and Tuakli-Wosornu, {Yetsa A.} and Yan, {Alan Y.} and Lemma, {Mesfin A.} and Laporte, {Dawn Mitzner}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.10.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "286--291",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Education",
issn = "1931-7204",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An analysis of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination rehabilitation section

AU - Mesfin, Addisu

AU - Farjoodi, Payam

AU - Tuakli-Wosornu, Yetsa A.

AU - Yan, Alan Y.

AU - Lemma, Mesfin A.

AU - Laporte, Dawn Mitzner

PY - 2012/5

Y1 - 2012/5

N2 - Objective: One subject tested by the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) is rehabilitation. Our purpose was to analyze the OITE's rehabilitation section to (1) identify the rehabilitation subjects that are tested, (2) evaluate trainee performance on this section, and (3) evaluate the literature cited for this section as an aide to the trainee preparation for future OITE examinations. Design: This study included OITE examinations from 2004 through 2009. The rehabilitation sections of these examinations were analyzed for content, type of questions asked (taxonomy 1: direct recall; taxonomy 2: diagnosis; taxonomy 3: evaluation/decision making and development of a treatment plan), and literature cited. The mean score in the rehabilitation section of the OITE from 2004 to 2009 was also evaluated, and literature citations were tabulated. Setting: Orthopaedic surgery residency. Results: In the 2004-2009 OITE examinations, a total of 1619 questions were administered, of which 53 (3.3%) related to rehabilitation. The most common rehabilitation questions assessed knowledge of prosthetic/orthotics (20.8%) and neuro-orthopedics (20.8%). Other questions addressed amputation (18.9%), physical therapy treatment and outcomes (18.9%), rehabilitation terminology (9.4%), and spinal cord injury (7.7%). Most frequently, the questions evaluated the trainee's direct recall of the subject (51%), evaluation/decision making and development of a treatment plan (30.1%), and diagnosis (18.9%). The mean score in the rehabilitation section of the OITE from 2004 through 2009 was 54.1% (range, 40% to 77.8%). A total of 53 references was used. The 3 most common references were the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume (10), Orthopaedic Knowledge Update (volumes 7 through 9) (8), and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (7). Conclusion: To our knowledge, our study is the first to analyze the rehabilitation section of the OITE. Our results will help the trainee prepare for the examination by focusing on the appropriate content and literature.

AB - Objective: One subject tested by the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) is rehabilitation. Our purpose was to analyze the OITE's rehabilitation section to (1) identify the rehabilitation subjects that are tested, (2) evaluate trainee performance on this section, and (3) evaluate the literature cited for this section as an aide to the trainee preparation for future OITE examinations. Design: This study included OITE examinations from 2004 through 2009. The rehabilitation sections of these examinations were analyzed for content, type of questions asked (taxonomy 1: direct recall; taxonomy 2: diagnosis; taxonomy 3: evaluation/decision making and development of a treatment plan), and literature cited. The mean score in the rehabilitation section of the OITE from 2004 to 2009 was also evaluated, and literature citations were tabulated. Setting: Orthopaedic surgery residency. Results: In the 2004-2009 OITE examinations, a total of 1619 questions were administered, of which 53 (3.3%) related to rehabilitation. The most common rehabilitation questions assessed knowledge of prosthetic/orthotics (20.8%) and neuro-orthopedics (20.8%). Other questions addressed amputation (18.9%), physical therapy treatment and outcomes (18.9%), rehabilitation terminology (9.4%), and spinal cord injury (7.7%). Most frequently, the questions evaluated the trainee's direct recall of the subject (51%), evaluation/decision making and development of a treatment plan (30.1%), and diagnosis (18.9%). The mean score in the rehabilitation section of the OITE from 2004 through 2009 was 54.1% (range, 40% to 77.8%). A total of 53 references was used. The 3 most common references were the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume (10), Orthopaedic Knowledge Update (volumes 7 through 9) (8), and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (7). Conclusion: To our knowledge, our study is the first to analyze the rehabilitation section of the OITE. Our results will help the trainee prepare for the examination by focusing on the appropriate content and literature.

KW - analysis

KW - orthopaedic in-training examination (OITE)

KW - rehabilitation

KW - residents

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859312697&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859312697&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.10.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.10.006

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 286

EP - 291

JO - Journal of Surgical Education

JF - Journal of Surgical Education

SN - 1931-7204

IS - 3

ER -