American registry of pathology expert opinions: Evaluation of poorly differentiated malignant neoplasms on limited samples – Gastrointestinal mucosal biopsies

Andrew M. Bellizzi, Elizabeth A. Montgomery, Jason L. Hornick

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

This review reflects a collaboration between the American Registry of Pathology (the publisher of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Fascicles) and Annals of Diagnostic Pathology. It is part of a series of expert recommendations on topics encountered in daily practice. The authors, three pathologists with expertise in gastrointestinal tract pathology and immunohistochemistry, met on 30 July 2019 tasked with developing expert recommendations for evaluating poorly differentiated and undifferentiated malignant neoplasms encountered on mucosal biopsies of the gastrointestinal tract. We focused on esophageal, gastric, small intestinal, colorectal, and anal (i.e., tubal gut) samples. When faced with diagnostic uncertainty on the initial H&E, it is best to begin by trying to assign the broad tumor class with screening markers such as pankeratin, S100 protein or SOX10, and CD20 or CD45. Once a broad tumor class is established, more specific differentiation markers can be pursued (e.g., lineage-restricted transcription factors for adenocarcinoma; p40 for squamous cell carcinoma; chromogranin A and synaptophysin or INSM1 for neuroendocrine neoplasms). Every small biopsy containing tumor should be considered a potential molecular pathology sample; cutting extra unstained slides with this testing in mind is strongly encouraged.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number151419
JournalAnnals of Diagnostic Pathology
Volume44
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2020

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Differential diagnosis
  • Immunohistochemistry
  • Site of origin
  • Tumor classification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this