Ambulatory gynaecological surgery

Risk and assessment

L. Reuven Pasternak, Amballur Johns

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Assessment of patients undergoing elective surgical procedures on an outpatient basis carries risks that range from mortality through non-lethal injuries to costs incurred for inappropriate testing. Ambulatory surgery accounts for over 60% of elective surgical procedures for most areas of the USA, Canada and Australia and a growing proportion of procedures in Europe and Asia. However, data to determine the true risk of these procedures are difficult to find due to standardized criteria for risk assessment and management. Nonetheless, this type of medical procedure, with appropriate preparation, is regarded as safe and standard. Assessment of patients undergoing these procedures must take into consideration the nature of the medical and surgical conditions. Diagnostic testing is only performed if the results might change the management of the patient. At present, the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification system and the ASA guidelines for pre-anesthesia evaluation serve as the most current examples of risk assessments and algorithms that can be used for appropriate management of patients undergoing elective surgical procedures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)663-679
Number of pages17
JournalBest Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume19
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2005

Fingerprint

Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
Elective Surgical Procedures
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Anesthesiology
Risk Management
Canada
Outpatients
Anesthesia
Guidelines
Costs and Cost Analysis
Mortality
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • ASA classification system
  • ASA guidelines for pre-anesthesia evaluation
  • Risk assessment
  • Stratification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Ambulatory gynaecological surgery : Risk and assessment. / Pasternak, L. Reuven; Johns, Amballur.

In: Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 19, No. 5, 12.2005, p. 663-679.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pasternak, L. Reuven ; Johns, Amballur. / Ambulatory gynaecological surgery : Risk and assessment. In: Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2005 ; Vol. 19, No. 5. pp. 663-679.
@article{d4cb58c28a6a49cca5a0b8f995cb992f,
title = "Ambulatory gynaecological surgery: Risk and assessment",
abstract = "Assessment of patients undergoing elective surgical procedures on an outpatient basis carries risks that range from mortality through non-lethal injuries to costs incurred for inappropriate testing. Ambulatory surgery accounts for over 60{\%} of elective surgical procedures for most areas of the USA, Canada and Australia and a growing proportion of procedures in Europe and Asia. However, data to determine the true risk of these procedures are difficult to find due to standardized criteria for risk assessment and management. Nonetheless, this type of medical procedure, with appropriate preparation, is regarded as safe and standard. Assessment of patients undergoing these procedures must take into consideration the nature of the medical and surgical conditions. Diagnostic testing is only performed if the results might change the management of the patient. At present, the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification system and the ASA guidelines for pre-anesthesia evaluation serve as the most current examples of risk assessments and algorithms that can be used for appropriate management of patients undergoing elective surgical procedures.",
keywords = "ASA classification system, ASA guidelines for pre-anesthesia evaluation, Risk assessment, Stratification",
author = "Pasternak, {L. Reuven} and Amballur Johns",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2005.06.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "663--679",
journal = "Best Practice and Research in Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology",
issn = "1521-6934",
publisher = "Bailliere Tindall Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ambulatory gynaecological surgery

T2 - Risk and assessment

AU - Pasternak, L. Reuven

AU - Johns, Amballur

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - Assessment of patients undergoing elective surgical procedures on an outpatient basis carries risks that range from mortality through non-lethal injuries to costs incurred for inappropriate testing. Ambulatory surgery accounts for over 60% of elective surgical procedures for most areas of the USA, Canada and Australia and a growing proportion of procedures in Europe and Asia. However, data to determine the true risk of these procedures are difficult to find due to standardized criteria for risk assessment and management. Nonetheless, this type of medical procedure, with appropriate preparation, is regarded as safe and standard. Assessment of patients undergoing these procedures must take into consideration the nature of the medical and surgical conditions. Diagnostic testing is only performed if the results might change the management of the patient. At present, the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification system and the ASA guidelines for pre-anesthesia evaluation serve as the most current examples of risk assessments and algorithms that can be used for appropriate management of patients undergoing elective surgical procedures.

AB - Assessment of patients undergoing elective surgical procedures on an outpatient basis carries risks that range from mortality through non-lethal injuries to costs incurred for inappropriate testing. Ambulatory surgery accounts for over 60% of elective surgical procedures for most areas of the USA, Canada and Australia and a growing proportion of procedures in Europe and Asia. However, data to determine the true risk of these procedures are difficult to find due to standardized criteria for risk assessment and management. Nonetheless, this type of medical procedure, with appropriate preparation, is regarded as safe and standard. Assessment of patients undergoing these procedures must take into consideration the nature of the medical and surgical conditions. Diagnostic testing is only performed if the results might change the management of the patient. At present, the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification system and the ASA guidelines for pre-anesthesia evaluation serve as the most current examples of risk assessments and algorithms that can be used for appropriate management of patients undergoing elective surgical procedures.

KW - ASA classification system

KW - ASA guidelines for pre-anesthesia evaluation

KW - Risk assessment

KW - Stratification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=29144531832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=29144531832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2005.06.003

DO - 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2005.06.003

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 663

EP - 679

JO - Best Practice and Research in Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - Best Practice and Research in Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology

SN - 1521-6934

IS - 5

ER -