Ambulatory antibiotic stewardship through a human factors engineering approach: A systematic review

Sara Keller, Pranita Tamma, Sara Cosgrove, Melissa A. Miller, Heather Sateia, Julie Szymczak, Ayse Gurses, Jeffrey A. Linder

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Introduction: In the United States, most antibiotics are prescribed in ambulatory settings. Human factors engineering, which explores interactions between people and the place where they work, has successfully improved quality of care. However, human factors engineering models have not been explored to frame what is known about ambulatory antibiotic stewardship (AS) interventions and barriers and facilitators to their implementation. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and searched OVID MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL to identify controlled interventions and qualitative studies of ambulatory AS and determine whether and how they incorporated principles from a human factors engineering model, the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety 2.0 model. This model describes how a work system (ambulatory clinic) contributes to a process (antibiotic prescribing) that leads to outcomes. The work system consists of 5 components, tools and technology, organization, person, tasks, and environment, within an external environment. Results: Of 1,288 abstracts initially identified, 42 quantitative studies and 17 qualitative studies met inclusion criteria. Effective interventions focused on tools and technology (eg, clinical decision support and point-of-care testing), the person (eg, clinician education), organization (eg, audit and feedback and academic detailing), tasks (eg, delayed antibiotic prescribing), the environment (eg, commitment posters), and the external environment (media campaigns). Studies have not focused on clinic-wide approaches to AS. Conclusions: A human factors engineering approach suggests that investigating the role of the clinic’s processes or physical layout or external pressures’ role in antibiotic prescribing may be a promising way to improve ambulatory AS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)417-430
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

Human Engineering
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Clinical Decision Support Systems
Organizations
Physical Phenomena
Technology
Posters
Quality of Health Care
Patient Safety
MEDLINE
Workplace
Education
Pressure

Keywords

  • Antibiotics
  • Antimicrobial Stewardship
  • Clinical Decision Support Systems
  • Patient Safety
  • Point-of-Care Testing
  • Quality Improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Ambulatory antibiotic stewardship through a human factors engineering approach : A systematic review. / Keller, Sara; Tamma, Pranita; Cosgrove, Sara; Miller, Melissa A.; Sateia, Heather; Szymczak, Julie; Gurses, Ayse; Linder, Jeffrey A.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, Vol. 31, No. 3, 01.05.2018, p. 417-430.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{3b27e1ee4814409daa9d02ffb3da60d3,
title = "Ambulatory antibiotic stewardship through a human factors engineering approach: A systematic review",
abstract = "Introduction: In the United States, most antibiotics are prescribed in ambulatory settings. Human factors engineering, which explores interactions between people and the place where they work, has successfully improved quality of care. However, human factors engineering models have not been explored to frame what is known about ambulatory antibiotic stewardship (AS) interventions and barriers and facilitators to their implementation. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and searched OVID MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL to identify controlled interventions and qualitative studies of ambulatory AS and determine whether and how they incorporated principles from a human factors engineering model, the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety 2.0 model. This model describes how a work system (ambulatory clinic) contributes to a process (antibiotic prescribing) that leads to outcomes. The work system consists of 5 components, tools and technology, organization, person, tasks, and environment, within an external environment. Results: Of 1,288 abstracts initially identified, 42 quantitative studies and 17 qualitative studies met inclusion criteria. Effective interventions focused on tools and technology (eg, clinical decision support and point-of-care testing), the person (eg, clinician education), organization (eg, audit and feedback and academic detailing), tasks (eg, delayed antibiotic prescribing), the environment (eg, commitment posters), and the external environment (media campaigns). Studies have not focused on clinic-wide approaches to AS. Conclusions: A human factors engineering approach suggests that investigating the role of the clinic’s processes or physical layout or external pressures’ role in antibiotic prescribing may be a promising way to improve ambulatory AS.",
keywords = "Antibiotics, Antimicrobial Stewardship, Clinical Decision Support Systems, Patient Safety, Point-of-Care Testing, Quality Improvement",
author = "Sara Keller and Pranita Tamma and Sara Cosgrove and Miller, {Melissa A.} and Heather Sateia and Julie Szymczak and Ayse Gurses and Linder, {Jeffrey A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170225",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "417--430",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ambulatory antibiotic stewardship through a human factors engineering approach

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Keller, Sara

AU - Tamma, Pranita

AU - Cosgrove, Sara

AU - Miller, Melissa A.

AU - Sateia, Heather

AU - Szymczak, Julie

AU - Gurses, Ayse

AU - Linder, Jeffrey A.

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Introduction: In the United States, most antibiotics are prescribed in ambulatory settings. Human factors engineering, which explores interactions between people and the place where they work, has successfully improved quality of care. However, human factors engineering models have not been explored to frame what is known about ambulatory antibiotic stewardship (AS) interventions and barriers and facilitators to their implementation. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and searched OVID MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL to identify controlled interventions and qualitative studies of ambulatory AS and determine whether and how they incorporated principles from a human factors engineering model, the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety 2.0 model. This model describes how a work system (ambulatory clinic) contributes to a process (antibiotic prescribing) that leads to outcomes. The work system consists of 5 components, tools and technology, organization, person, tasks, and environment, within an external environment. Results: Of 1,288 abstracts initially identified, 42 quantitative studies and 17 qualitative studies met inclusion criteria. Effective interventions focused on tools and technology (eg, clinical decision support and point-of-care testing), the person (eg, clinician education), organization (eg, audit and feedback and academic detailing), tasks (eg, delayed antibiotic prescribing), the environment (eg, commitment posters), and the external environment (media campaigns). Studies have not focused on clinic-wide approaches to AS. Conclusions: A human factors engineering approach suggests that investigating the role of the clinic’s processes or physical layout or external pressures’ role in antibiotic prescribing may be a promising way to improve ambulatory AS.

AB - Introduction: In the United States, most antibiotics are prescribed in ambulatory settings. Human factors engineering, which explores interactions between people and the place where they work, has successfully improved quality of care. However, human factors engineering models have not been explored to frame what is known about ambulatory antibiotic stewardship (AS) interventions and barriers and facilitators to their implementation. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and searched OVID MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL to identify controlled interventions and qualitative studies of ambulatory AS and determine whether and how they incorporated principles from a human factors engineering model, the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety 2.0 model. This model describes how a work system (ambulatory clinic) contributes to a process (antibiotic prescribing) that leads to outcomes. The work system consists of 5 components, tools and technology, organization, person, tasks, and environment, within an external environment. Results: Of 1,288 abstracts initially identified, 42 quantitative studies and 17 qualitative studies met inclusion criteria. Effective interventions focused on tools and technology (eg, clinical decision support and point-of-care testing), the person (eg, clinician education), organization (eg, audit and feedback and academic detailing), tasks (eg, delayed antibiotic prescribing), the environment (eg, commitment posters), and the external environment (media campaigns). Studies have not focused on clinic-wide approaches to AS. Conclusions: A human factors engineering approach suggests that investigating the role of the clinic’s processes or physical layout or external pressures’ role in antibiotic prescribing may be a promising way to improve ambulatory AS.

KW - Antibiotics

KW - Antimicrobial Stewardship

KW - Clinical Decision Support Systems

KW - Patient Safety

KW - Point-of-Care Testing

KW - Quality Improvement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047375954&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047375954&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170225

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170225

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29743225

AN - SCOPUS:85047375954

VL - 31

SP - 417

EP - 430

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

IS - 3

ER -