Ambulance snatching: How vulnerable are we?

Donald William Alves, Richard A. Bissell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Out of concern that ambulances might be targeted for hijack for terrorism purposes, we observed security-related behaviors of a cross-section of ambulance crews and their vehicles in Emergency Department ambulance bays. We sent observers to a convenience sample of trauma and suburban Emergency Department ambulance entrances in several states. We observed 151 total ambulance arrivals. Overall, the average time present was 21.5 min, 23.2% of units were left with the engine running, 26.5% were left open, 90.1% were left unattended, 84.1% were unlocked, and 16.6% had a non-crew visitor in the ambulance bay. Several issues were identified demonstrating potential "attractiveness" to individuals who may wish to disrupt Emergency Medical Services or steal an emergency vehicle. We are concerned that this is the case at the majority of ambulance bays in our country. Emergency services agencies should take steps to train their personnel to secure the ambulance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)211-214
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Emergency Medicine
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2003

Fingerprint

Ambulances
Hospital Emergency Service
Emergencies
Terrorism
Emergency Medical Services
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Ambulance
  • Emergency Medical Services
  • Security
  • Terrorism
  • Theft

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Ambulance snatching : How vulnerable are we? / Alves, Donald William; Bissell, Richard A.

In: Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 25, No. 2, 08.2003, p. 211-214.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Alves, Donald William ; Bissell, Richard A. / Ambulance snatching : How vulnerable are we?. In: Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2003 ; Vol. 25, No. 2. pp. 211-214.
@article{59a55de5673b4dc6b7d00985228b48f4,
title = "Ambulance snatching: How vulnerable are we?",
abstract = "Out of concern that ambulances might be targeted for hijack for terrorism purposes, we observed security-related behaviors of a cross-section of ambulance crews and their vehicles in Emergency Department ambulance bays. We sent observers to a convenience sample of trauma and suburban Emergency Department ambulance entrances in several states. We observed 151 total ambulance arrivals. Overall, the average time present was 21.5 min, 23.2{\%} of units were left with the engine running, 26.5{\%} were left open, 90.1{\%} were left unattended, 84.1{\%} were unlocked, and 16.6{\%} had a non-crew visitor in the ambulance bay. Several issues were identified demonstrating potential {"}attractiveness{"} to individuals who may wish to disrupt Emergency Medical Services or steal an emergency vehicle. We are concerned that this is the case at the majority of ambulance bays in our country. Emergency services agencies should take steps to train their personnel to secure the ambulance.",
keywords = "Ambulance, Emergency Medical Services, Security, Terrorism, Theft",
author = "Alves, {Donald William} and Bissell, {Richard A.}",
year = "2003",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/S0736-4679(03)00177-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "211--214",
journal = "Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0736-4679",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ambulance snatching

T2 - How vulnerable are we?

AU - Alves, Donald William

AU - Bissell, Richard A.

PY - 2003/8

Y1 - 2003/8

N2 - Out of concern that ambulances might be targeted for hijack for terrorism purposes, we observed security-related behaviors of a cross-section of ambulance crews and their vehicles in Emergency Department ambulance bays. We sent observers to a convenience sample of trauma and suburban Emergency Department ambulance entrances in several states. We observed 151 total ambulance arrivals. Overall, the average time present was 21.5 min, 23.2% of units were left with the engine running, 26.5% were left open, 90.1% were left unattended, 84.1% were unlocked, and 16.6% had a non-crew visitor in the ambulance bay. Several issues were identified demonstrating potential "attractiveness" to individuals who may wish to disrupt Emergency Medical Services or steal an emergency vehicle. We are concerned that this is the case at the majority of ambulance bays in our country. Emergency services agencies should take steps to train their personnel to secure the ambulance.

AB - Out of concern that ambulances might be targeted for hijack for terrorism purposes, we observed security-related behaviors of a cross-section of ambulance crews and their vehicles in Emergency Department ambulance bays. We sent observers to a convenience sample of trauma and suburban Emergency Department ambulance entrances in several states. We observed 151 total ambulance arrivals. Overall, the average time present was 21.5 min, 23.2% of units were left with the engine running, 26.5% were left open, 90.1% were left unattended, 84.1% were unlocked, and 16.6% had a non-crew visitor in the ambulance bay. Several issues were identified demonstrating potential "attractiveness" to individuals who may wish to disrupt Emergency Medical Services or steal an emergency vehicle. We are concerned that this is the case at the majority of ambulance bays in our country. Emergency services agencies should take steps to train their personnel to secure the ambulance.

KW - Ambulance

KW - Emergency Medical Services

KW - Security

KW - Terrorism

KW - Theft

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042668392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042668392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0736-4679(03)00177-X

DO - 10.1016/S0736-4679(03)00177-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 12902013

AN - SCOPUS:0042668392

VL - 25

SP - 211

EP - 214

JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0736-4679

IS - 2

ER -