Alternative treatments for weight loss: A critical review

David B. Allison; Kevin R. Fontaine; Stanley Heshka; Janet L. Mentore; Steven B. Heymsfield

doi:10.1080/20014091091661

Alternative treatments for weight loss: A critical review

David B. Allison, Kevin R. Fontaine, Stanley Heshka, Janet L. Mentore, Steven B. Heymsfield

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

"Nontraditional" or "alternative" treatments are extremely popular, especially with respect to obesity and body composition. Although such treatments are widely used, it is not clear that these are supported by the existing data in the peer-reviewed literature. Herein, we review the data on 18 methods/products advocated as potential anti-obesity/fat-reducing agents. We have found that none have been convincingly demonstrated to be safe and effective in two or more peer-reviewed publications of randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials conducted by at least two independent laboratories. Nevertheless, some have plausible mechanisms of action and encouraging preliminary data that are sufficiently provocative to merit further research.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1-28
Number of pages	28
Journal	Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Volume	41
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/20014091091661
State	Published - 2001
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Body composition
Herbal medicines
Nutritional supplements
Weight loss

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Medicine (miscellaneous)
Food Science

Access to Document

10.1080/20014091091661

Cite this

@article{881269b0a0df4e31b0ec73ac8daa213b,

title = "Alternative treatments for weight loss: A critical review",

abstract = "{"}Nontraditional{"} or {"}alternative{"} treatments are extremely popular, especially with respect to obesity and body composition. Although such treatments are widely used, it is not clear that these are supported by the existing data in the peer-reviewed literature. Herein, we review the data on 18 methods/products advocated as potential anti-obesity/fat-reducing agents. We have found that none have been convincingly demonstrated to be safe and effective in two or more peer-reviewed publications of randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials conducted by at least two independent laboratories. Nevertheless, some have plausible mechanisms of action and encouraging preliminary data that are sufficiently provocative to merit further research.",

keywords = "Body composition, Herbal medicines, Nutritional supplements, Weight loss",

author = "Allison, {David B.} and Fontaine, {Kevin R.} and Stanley Heshka and Mentore, {Janet L.} and Heymsfield, {Steven B.}",

year = "2001",

doi = "10.1080/20014091091661",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "41",

pages = "1--28",

journal = "Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition",

issn = "1040-8398",

publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Alternative treatments for weight loss

T2 - A critical review

AU - Allison, David B.

AU - Fontaine, Kevin R.

AU - Heshka, Stanley

AU - Mentore, Janet L.

AU - Heymsfield, Steven B.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - "Nontraditional" or "alternative" treatments are extremely popular, especially with respect to obesity and body composition. Although such treatments are widely used, it is not clear that these are supported by the existing data in the peer-reviewed literature. Herein, we review the data on 18 methods/products advocated as potential anti-obesity/fat-reducing agents. We have found that none have been convincingly demonstrated to be safe and effective in two or more peer-reviewed publications of randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials conducted by at least two independent laboratories. Nevertheless, some have plausible mechanisms of action and encouraging preliminary data that are sufficiently provocative to merit further research.

AB - "Nontraditional" or "alternative" treatments are extremely popular, especially with respect to obesity and body composition. Although such treatments are widely used, it is not clear that these are supported by the existing data in the peer-reviewed literature. Herein, we review the data on 18 methods/products advocated as potential anti-obesity/fat-reducing agents. We have found that none have been convincingly demonstrated to be safe and effective in two or more peer-reviewed publications of randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials conducted by at least two independent laboratories. Nevertheless, some have plausible mechanisms of action and encouraging preliminary data that are sufficiently provocative to merit further research.

KW - Body composition

KW - Herbal medicines

KW - Nutritional supplements

KW - Weight loss

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035145219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035145219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/20014091091661

DO - 10.1080/20014091091661

M3 - Article

C2 - 11152041

AN - SCOPUS:0035145219

VL - 41

SP - 1

EP - 28

JO - Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition

JF - Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition

SN - 1040-8398

IS - 1

ER -

Alternative treatments for weight loss: A critical review

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this