Alcohol violations and aviation accidents: Findings from the U.S. Mandatory Alcohol Testing Program

Guohua Li, Susan P. Baker, Yandong Qiang, George W. Rebok, Melissa L. McCarthy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Mandatory alcohol testing has been implemented in the U.S. aviation industry since 1995. This study documents the prevalence of alcohol violations and the association between alcohol violations and aviation accidents among aviation employees with safety-sensitive functions. Methods: Data from the random alcohol testing and post-accident alcohol testing programs reported by major airlines to the Federal Aviation Administration for the years 1995 through 2002 were analyzed. A violation was defined as an alcohol level of ≥ 0.04% or a refusal to submit to testing. Relative and attributable risks of accident involvement associated with alcohol violations were estimated using the case-control method. Results: During the study period, random alcohol testing yielded a total of 440 violations, with an overall prevalence rate of 0.09% and a prevalence rate of 0.03% for flight crews. Alcohol violations were associated with an increased yet not statistically significant risk of accident involvement (odds ratio 2.56, 95% confidence interval 0.81-7.08) and were attributed to 0.13% of aviation accidents. Discussion: Alcohol violations among U.S. major airline employees with safety-sensitive functions are rare and play a negligible role in aviation accidents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)510-513
Number of pages4
JournalAviation Space and Environmental Medicine
Volume78
Issue number5 I
StatePublished - May 2007

Keywords

  • Accident
  • Alcohol
  • Aviation
  • Epidemiology
  • Occupational safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Alcohol violations and aviation accidents: Findings from the U.S. Mandatory Alcohol Testing Program'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this