AIDS and behavioural risk factors in women in inner city Baltimore: A comparison of telephone and face to face surveys

M. Nebot, David D Celentano, L. Burwell, A. Davis, M. Polacsek, J. Santelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Study objective- The study aimed to investigate the influence the mode of administration of a questionnaire (telephone or face to face) on reports of sexual behaviour and attitudes of HIV risk among woman of reproductive age. Design - Two cross sectional surveys one, a modified random digit dialing telephone survey, the second, a face to face street sample - were carried out by the same interviewers using similar questionnaires in the same neighbourhoods. Setting and participants - Two socially deprived, inner city neighbourhoods of Baltimore City were assessed in early 1990 before a community health intervention was carried out in one of them. Women between 17 and 35 years were surveyed. Main results- Altogether 775 and 416 women in the target age group were interviewed by telephone and face to face methods: the response rates were 66.4% and 77% respectively. Telephone respondents tended to be older, had more education, were more often married, were less likely to live in subsidised housing, and were more likely to report HIV testing. The proportions of respondents who reported a previous abortion and had had a surgical sterilisation were higher among the telephone respondents (34.7% v24.1% and 26.4% v20.6%, respectively). With regard to sexual risk behaviour, the only statistically significant differences were found in the proportion who reported having used drugs (10.6% of the face to face v 2.4% of the telephone sample) or alcohol (30.5% v 16.3%) at last sexual intercourse. The observed method effect on these variables remained unchanged after adjusting for age, education, employment, and marital status. This effect was even stronger for a subgroup of face to face respondents who reported not having a telephone at home. The adjusted odds ratios for reporting alcohol consumption and use of drugs at the last sexual encounter in this group compared with the telephone respondents were 3.7 (2.1, 6.6) and 14.1(5.7, 34.5) respectively. Conclusions- Despite the socioeconomic bias associated with the mode of data collection, there are only a few differences between the telephone and personal survey methods in reports of sexual behaviour. These differences are mostly concentrated in young women (under 20 years), and in a particulary socioeconomically deprived subgroup identified through telephone ownership.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)412-418
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Volume48
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Baltimore
Telephone
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Sexual Behavior
Sensitivity Training Groups
Surveys and Questionnaires
HIV
Education
Induced Abortion
Ownership
Coitus
Marital Status
Risk-Taking
Alcohol Drinking
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Age Groups
Cross-Sectional Studies
Odds Ratio
Alcohols
Interviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

AIDS and behavioural risk factors in women in inner city Baltimore : A comparison of telephone and face to face surveys. / Nebot, M.; Celentano, David D; Burwell, L.; Davis, A.; Polacsek, M.; Santelli, J.

In: Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, Vol. 48, No. 4, 1994, p. 412-418.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e46b910302e84fed98e935629e90721e,
title = "AIDS and behavioural risk factors in women in inner city Baltimore: A comparison of telephone and face to face surveys",
abstract = "Study objective- The study aimed to investigate the influence the mode of administration of a questionnaire (telephone or face to face) on reports of sexual behaviour and attitudes of HIV risk among woman of reproductive age. Design - Two cross sectional surveys one, a modified random digit dialing telephone survey, the second, a face to face street sample - were carried out by the same interviewers using similar questionnaires in the same neighbourhoods. Setting and participants - Two socially deprived, inner city neighbourhoods of Baltimore City were assessed in early 1990 before a community health intervention was carried out in one of them. Women between 17 and 35 years were surveyed. Main results- Altogether 775 and 416 women in the target age group were interviewed by telephone and face to face methods: the response rates were 66.4{\%} and 77{\%} respectively. Telephone respondents tended to be older, had more education, were more often married, were less likely to live in subsidised housing, and were more likely to report HIV testing. The proportions of respondents who reported a previous abortion and had had a surgical sterilisation were higher among the telephone respondents (34.7{\%} v24.1{\%} and 26.4{\%} v20.6{\%}, respectively). With regard to sexual risk behaviour, the only statistically significant differences were found in the proportion who reported having used drugs (10.6{\%} of the face to face v 2.4{\%} of the telephone sample) or alcohol (30.5{\%} v 16.3{\%}) at last sexual intercourse. The observed method effect on these variables remained unchanged after adjusting for age, education, employment, and marital status. This effect was even stronger for a subgroup of face to face respondents who reported not having a telephone at home. The adjusted odds ratios for reporting alcohol consumption and use of drugs at the last sexual encounter in this group compared with the telephone respondents were 3.7 (2.1, 6.6) and 14.1(5.7, 34.5) respectively. Conclusions- Despite the socioeconomic bias associated with the mode of data collection, there are only a few differences between the telephone and personal survey methods in reports of sexual behaviour. These differences are mostly concentrated in young women (under 20 years), and in a particulary socioeconomically deprived subgroup identified through telephone ownership.",
author = "M. Nebot and Celentano, {David D} and L. Burwell and A. Davis and M. Polacsek and J. Santelli",
year = "1994",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "412--418",
journal = "Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health",
issn = "0143-005X",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - AIDS and behavioural risk factors in women in inner city Baltimore

T2 - A comparison of telephone and face to face surveys

AU - Nebot, M.

AU - Celentano, David D

AU - Burwell, L.

AU - Davis, A.

AU - Polacsek, M.

AU - Santelli, J.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Study objective- The study aimed to investigate the influence the mode of administration of a questionnaire (telephone or face to face) on reports of sexual behaviour and attitudes of HIV risk among woman of reproductive age. Design - Two cross sectional surveys one, a modified random digit dialing telephone survey, the second, a face to face street sample - were carried out by the same interviewers using similar questionnaires in the same neighbourhoods. Setting and participants - Two socially deprived, inner city neighbourhoods of Baltimore City were assessed in early 1990 before a community health intervention was carried out in one of them. Women between 17 and 35 years were surveyed. Main results- Altogether 775 and 416 women in the target age group were interviewed by telephone and face to face methods: the response rates were 66.4% and 77% respectively. Telephone respondents tended to be older, had more education, were more often married, were less likely to live in subsidised housing, and were more likely to report HIV testing. The proportions of respondents who reported a previous abortion and had had a surgical sterilisation were higher among the telephone respondents (34.7% v24.1% and 26.4% v20.6%, respectively). With regard to sexual risk behaviour, the only statistically significant differences were found in the proportion who reported having used drugs (10.6% of the face to face v 2.4% of the telephone sample) or alcohol (30.5% v 16.3%) at last sexual intercourse. The observed method effect on these variables remained unchanged after adjusting for age, education, employment, and marital status. This effect was even stronger for a subgroup of face to face respondents who reported not having a telephone at home. The adjusted odds ratios for reporting alcohol consumption and use of drugs at the last sexual encounter in this group compared with the telephone respondents were 3.7 (2.1, 6.6) and 14.1(5.7, 34.5) respectively. Conclusions- Despite the socioeconomic bias associated with the mode of data collection, there are only a few differences between the telephone and personal survey methods in reports of sexual behaviour. These differences are mostly concentrated in young women (under 20 years), and in a particulary socioeconomically deprived subgroup identified through telephone ownership.

AB - Study objective- The study aimed to investigate the influence the mode of administration of a questionnaire (telephone or face to face) on reports of sexual behaviour and attitudes of HIV risk among woman of reproductive age. Design - Two cross sectional surveys one, a modified random digit dialing telephone survey, the second, a face to face street sample - were carried out by the same interviewers using similar questionnaires in the same neighbourhoods. Setting and participants - Two socially deprived, inner city neighbourhoods of Baltimore City were assessed in early 1990 before a community health intervention was carried out in one of them. Women between 17 and 35 years were surveyed. Main results- Altogether 775 and 416 women in the target age group were interviewed by telephone and face to face methods: the response rates were 66.4% and 77% respectively. Telephone respondents tended to be older, had more education, were more often married, were less likely to live in subsidised housing, and were more likely to report HIV testing. The proportions of respondents who reported a previous abortion and had had a surgical sterilisation were higher among the telephone respondents (34.7% v24.1% and 26.4% v20.6%, respectively). With regard to sexual risk behaviour, the only statistically significant differences were found in the proportion who reported having used drugs (10.6% of the face to face v 2.4% of the telephone sample) or alcohol (30.5% v 16.3%) at last sexual intercourse. The observed method effect on these variables remained unchanged after adjusting for age, education, employment, and marital status. This effect was even stronger for a subgroup of face to face respondents who reported not having a telephone at home. The adjusted odds ratios for reporting alcohol consumption and use of drugs at the last sexual encounter in this group compared with the telephone respondents were 3.7 (2.1, 6.6) and 14.1(5.7, 34.5) respectively. Conclusions- Despite the socioeconomic bias associated with the mode of data collection, there are only a few differences between the telephone and personal survey methods in reports of sexual behaviour. These differences are mostly concentrated in young women (under 20 years), and in a particulary socioeconomically deprived subgroup identified through telephone ownership.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027953782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027953782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7964343

AN - SCOPUS:0027953782

VL - 48

SP - 412

EP - 418

JO - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

JF - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

SN - 0143-005X

IS - 4

ER -