TY - JOUR
T1 - AI-based detection of erythema migrans and disambiguation against other skin lesions
AU - Burlina, Philippe M.
AU - Joshi, Neil J.
AU - Mathew, Phil A.
AU - Paul, William
AU - Rebman, Alison W.
AU - Aucott, John N.
N1 - Funding Information:
The funding of the Lyme Disease Research Foundation , the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Research and Development Funds , and the support of the Johns Hopkins Institute for Assured Autonomy are gratefully acknowledged. The views expressed here are those of the authors and not of the funding entities. We thank Dr. Elizabeth Horn from the Lyme Disease Biobank for the procurement of additional EM images, and Cheryl Novak for assistance with annotation of images.
Funding Information:
The funding of the Lyme Disease Research Foundation, the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Research and Development Funds, and the support of the Johns Hopkins Institute for Assured Autonomy are gratefully acknowledged. The views expressed here are those of the authors and not of the funding entities. We thank Dr. Elizabeth Horn from the Lyme Disease Biobank for the procurement of additional EM images, and Cheryl Novak for assistance with annotation of images.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2020/10
Y1 - 2020/10
N2 - This study examines the use of AI methods and deep learning (DL) for prescreening skin lesions and detecting the characteristic erythema migrans rash of acute Lyme disease. Accurate identification of erythema migrans allows for early diagnosis and treatment, which avoids the potential for later neurologic, rheumatologic, and cardiac complications of Lyme disease. We develop and test several deep learning models for detecting erythema migrans versus several other clinically relevant skin conditions, including cellulitis, tinea corporis, herpes zoster, erythema multiforme, lesions due to tick bites and insect bites, as well as non-pathogenic normal skin. We consider a set of clinically-relevant binary and multiclass classification problems of increasing complexity. We train the DL models on a combination of publicly available images and test on public images as well as images obtained in the clinical setting. We report performance metrics that measure agreement with a gold standard, as well as a receiver operating characteristic curve and associated area under the curve. On public images, we find that the DL system has an accuracy ranging from 71.58% (and 95% error margin equal to 3.77%) for an 8-class problem of EM versus 7 other classes including other skin pathologies, insect bites and normal skin, to 94.23% (3.66%) for a binary problem of EM vs. non-pathological skin. On clinical images of affected individuals, the DL system has a sensitivity of 88.55% (2.39%). These results suggest that a DL system can help in prescreening and referring individuals to physicians for earlier diagnosis and treatment, in the presence of clinically relevant confusers, thereby reducing further complications and morbidity.
AB - This study examines the use of AI methods and deep learning (DL) for prescreening skin lesions and detecting the characteristic erythema migrans rash of acute Lyme disease. Accurate identification of erythema migrans allows for early diagnosis and treatment, which avoids the potential for later neurologic, rheumatologic, and cardiac complications of Lyme disease. We develop and test several deep learning models for detecting erythema migrans versus several other clinically relevant skin conditions, including cellulitis, tinea corporis, herpes zoster, erythema multiforme, lesions due to tick bites and insect bites, as well as non-pathogenic normal skin. We consider a set of clinically-relevant binary and multiclass classification problems of increasing complexity. We train the DL models on a combination of publicly available images and test on public images as well as images obtained in the clinical setting. We report performance metrics that measure agreement with a gold standard, as well as a receiver operating characteristic curve and associated area under the curve. On public images, we find that the DL system has an accuracy ranging from 71.58% (and 95% error margin equal to 3.77%) for an 8-class problem of EM versus 7 other classes including other skin pathologies, insect bites and normal skin, to 94.23% (3.66%) for a binary problem of EM vs. non-pathological skin. On clinical images of affected individuals, the DL system has a sensitivity of 88.55% (2.39%). These results suggest that a DL system can help in prescreening and referring individuals to physicians for earlier diagnosis and treatment, in the presence of clinically relevant confusers, thereby reducing further complications and morbidity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090830205&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090830205&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103977
DO - 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103977
M3 - Article
C2 - 32949845
AN - SCOPUS:85090830205
SN - 0010-4825
VL - 125
JO - Computers in Biology and Medicine
JF - Computers in Biology and Medicine
M1 - 103977
ER -