Agreement between DSM-III, DSM-III-R, DSM-IV and ICD-10 alcohol diagnoses in US community-sample heavy drinkers

Deborah Hasin, Qun Li, Stephen Mccloud, Jean Endicott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

DSM-III-R, DSM-IV and ICD-10 definitions of alcohol dependence were all developed from the concept of the Alcohol Dependence Syndrome, and thus have a common theoretical link. This link is not shared by DSM-III, and no link exists between definitions of abuse in the different classification systems. The level of agreement on diagnoses produced by the different systems has practical as well as theoretical implications. We tested this agreement in 962 US household residents randomly sampled and screened for heavier than average drinking in the last 12 months. Agreement for most comparisons involving diagnoses of current dependence ranged from good to excellent, with no clear pattern of lower agreement for DSM-III. However, agreement on past dependence was sharply lower for comparisons involving DSM-III than those involving the other classification systems. This appeared to be due to the DSM-III requirement for physiological dependence and the apparently emerging nature of the disorder in this relatively young, non-treatment sample. Comparisons for abuse were generally poor for current as well as past diagnoses. Implications of the findings are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1517-1527
Number of pages11
JournalAddiction
Volume91
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

International Classification of Diseases
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Alcohols
Alcoholism
Drinking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Agreement between DSM-III, DSM-III-R, DSM-IV and ICD-10 alcohol diagnoses in US community-sample heavy drinkers. / Hasin, Deborah; Li, Qun; Mccloud, Stephen; Endicott, Jean.

In: Addiction, Vol. 91, No. 10, 1996, p. 1517-1527.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hasin, Deborah ; Li, Qun ; Mccloud, Stephen ; Endicott, Jean. / Agreement between DSM-III, DSM-III-R, DSM-IV and ICD-10 alcohol diagnoses in US community-sample heavy drinkers. In: Addiction. 1996 ; Vol. 91, No. 10. pp. 1517-1527.
@article{2e69149a2dfa44ee8b65094a0a90470c,
title = "Agreement between DSM-III, DSM-III-R, DSM-IV and ICD-10 alcohol diagnoses in US community-sample heavy drinkers",
abstract = "DSM-III-R, DSM-IV and ICD-10 definitions of alcohol dependence were all developed from the concept of the Alcohol Dependence Syndrome, and thus have a common theoretical link. This link is not shared by DSM-III, and no link exists between definitions of abuse in the different classification systems. The level of agreement on diagnoses produced by the different systems has practical as well as theoretical implications. We tested this agreement in 962 US household residents randomly sampled and screened for heavier than average drinking in the last 12 months. Agreement for most comparisons involving diagnoses of current dependence ranged from good to excellent, with no clear pattern of lower agreement for DSM-III. However, agreement on past dependence was sharply lower for comparisons involving DSM-III than those involving the other classification systems. This appeared to be due to the DSM-III requirement for physiological dependence and the apparently emerging nature of the disorder in this relatively young, non-treatment sample. Comparisons for abuse were generally poor for current as well as past diagnoses. Implications of the findings are discussed.",
author = "Deborah Hasin and Qun Li and Stephen Mccloud and Jean Endicott",
year = "1996",
doi = "10.1111/j.1360-0443.1996.tb02255.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
pages = "1517--1527",
journal = "Addiction",
issn = "0965-2140",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Agreement between DSM-III, DSM-III-R, DSM-IV and ICD-10 alcohol diagnoses in US community-sample heavy drinkers

AU - Hasin, Deborah

AU - Li, Qun

AU - Mccloud, Stephen

AU - Endicott, Jean

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - DSM-III-R, DSM-IV and ICD-10 definitions of alcohol dependence were all developed from the concept of the Alcohol Dependence Syndrome, and thus have a common theoretical link. This link is not shared by DSM-III, and no link exists between definitions of abuse in the different classification systems. The level of agreement on diagnoses produced by the different systems has practical as well as theoretical implications. We tested this agreement in 962 US household residents randomly sampled and screened for heavier than average drinking in the last 12 months. Agreement for most comparisons involving diagnoses of current dependence ranged from good to excellent, with no clear pattern of lower agreement for DSM-III. However, agreement on past dependence was sharply lower for comparisons involving DSM-III than those involving the other classification systems. This appeared to be due to the DSM-III requirement for physiological dependence and the apparently emerging nature of the disorder in this relatively young, non-treatment sample. Comparisons for abuse were generally poor for current as well as past diagnoses. Implications of the findings are discussed.

AB - DSM-III-R, DSM-IV and ICD-10 definitions of alcohol dependence were all developed from the concept of the Alcohol Dependence Syndrome, and thus have a common theoretical link. This link is not shared by DSM-III, and no link exists between definitions of abuse in the different classification systems. The level of agreement on diagnoses produced by the different systems has practical as well as theoretical implications. We tested this agreement in 962 US household residents randomly sampled and screened for heavier than average drinking in the last 12 months. Agreement for most comparisons involving diagnoses of current dependence ranged from good to excellent, with no clear pattern of lower agreement for DSM-III. However, agreement on past dependence was sharply lower for comparisons involving DSM-III than those involving the other classification systems. This appeared to be due to the DSM-III requirement for physiological dependence and the apparently emerging nature of the disorder in this relatively young, non-treatment sample. Comparisons for abuse were generally poor for current as well as past diagnoses. Implications of the findings are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029839259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029839259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1996.tb02255.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1996.tb02255.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 8917919

AN - SCOPUS:0029839259

VL - 91

SP - 1517

EP - 1527

JO - Addiction

JF - Addiction

SN - 0965-2140

IS - 10

ER -