Age changes in personality and their origins: Comment on Roberts, Walton, and Viechtbauer (2006)

Paul T. Costa, Robert R. McCrae

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

142 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although B. W. Roberts, K. W. Walton, and W. Viechtbauer (2006) depicted the present authors as proponents of the immutability of traits, in fact we have always acknowledged the possibility of change, and we are pleased that the results of their meta-analysis are consistent with our conclusions about modest change after age 30. We agree with B.W. Roberts et al. that analyses should be conducted at the level of more specific traits, but prefer the 30 facets of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory to the Social Dominance-Social Vitality distinction. The origins of age changes might be found either in environmental influences common to all cultures or in biologically based intrinsic maturation; we offer some reasons for preferring the latter interpretation. Meta-analyses are useful but not definitive, and the resolution of the origin question lies in further research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)26-28
Number of pages3
JournalPsychological Bulletin
Volume132
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Biology
  • Culture
  • Maturation
  • Meta-analysis
  • Traits

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Age changes in personality and their origins: Comment on Roberts, Walton, and Viechtbauer (2006)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this