African Americans with a family history of colorectal cancer: Barriers and facilitators to screening

Kathleen A. Griffith, Susan R. Passmore, Domanic Smith, Jennifer Wenzel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose/Objectives: To explore barriers and facilitators of screening for colorectal cancer (CRC), as well as suggestions for improving screening among African Americans with firstdegree relatives with CRC. Research Approach: A qualitative, descriptive approach involving focus groups. Setting: A community healthcare clinic in Baltimore, MD. Participants: 14 African American men and women aged 40 or older with at least one first-degree family member affected by CRC. Methodologic Approach: In-depth focus groups were conducted until thematic saturation was achieved. Thematic analysis and data reduction were conducted using ATLAS.ti, version 5.0. Main Research Variables: CRC screening barriers and facilitators. Findings: The participants were mostly male, insured, and had a parent with CRC. Commonly reported barriers to CRC screening included fear of serious illness, mistrust of the medical establishment, potential screening discomfort, lack of information on CRC risk factors, lack of healthcare access, absence of symptoms, no knowledge of CRC screening benefits, community reticence about cancer, and CRC myths. Facilitating factors for CRC screening included a belief of personal risk for CRC, physician recommendations, and acknowledgment of age as a risk factor. Suggestions to increase screening rates included distribution of culturally appropriate and community-based efforts (e.g., mobile units, church-based interventions). Participants also suggested ways to increase motivation and provide social support for screening patients. Conclusions: Additional research is needed to identify and test effective screening approaches for this underserved group at increased risk for CRC. Study results suggest that cancer risk and screening education, coupled with screening opportunities in the community, may yield increased screening rates. Interpretation: Lack of knowledge about CRC and CRC screening exists in the study population. Promoting screening across generations, developing and disseminating culturally appropriate educational materials within the community, and encouraging older individuals to screen to take care of their family may be appropriate interventions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)299-306
Number of pages8
JournalOncology Nursing Forum
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2012

Fingerprint

African Americans
Colorectal Neoplasms
Early Detection of Cancer
Focus Groups
Research
Community Health Services
Baltimore
Social Support
Fear
Motivation
Delivery of Health Care
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology(nursing)

Cite this

African Americans with a family history of colorectal cancer : Barriers and facilitators to screening. / Griffith, Kathleen A.; Passmore, Susan R.; Smith, Domanic; Wenzel, Jennifer.

In: Oncology Nursing Forum, Vol. 39, No. 3, 05.2012, p. 299-306.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Griffith, Kathleen A. ; Passmore, Susan R. ; Smith, Domanic ; Wenzel, Jennifer. / African Americans with a family history of colorectal cancer : Barriers and facilitators to screening. In: Oncology Nursing Forum. 2012 ; Vol. 39, No. 3. pp. 299-306.
@article{15cc4cc05b224f49a59506630c4770b0,
title = "African Americans with a family history of colorectal cancer: Barriers and facilitators to screening",
abstract = "Purpose/Objectives: To explore barriers and facilitators of screening for colorectal cancer (CRC), as well as suggestions for improving screening among African Americans with firstdegree relatives with CRC. Research Approach: A qualitative, descriptive approach involving focus groups. Setting: A community healthcare clinic in Baltimore, MD. Participants: 14 African American men and women aged 40 or older with at least one first-degree family member affected by CRC. Methodologic Approach: In-depth focus groups were conducted until thematic saturation was achieved. Thematic analysis and data reduction were conducted using ATLAS.ti, version 5.0. Main Research Variables: CRC screening barriers and facilitators. Findings: The participants were mostly male, insured, and had a parent with CRC. Commonly reported barriers to CRC screening included fear of serious illness, mistrust of the medical establishment, potential screening discomfort, lack of information on CRC risk factors, lack of healthcare access, absence of symptoms, no knowledge of CRC screening benefits, community reticence about cancer, and CRC myths. Facilitating factors for CRC screening included a belief of personal risk for CRC, physician recommendations, and acknowledgment of age as a risk factor. Suggestions to increase screening rates included distribution of culturally appropriate and community-based efforts (e.g., mobile units, church-based interventions). Participants also suggested ways to increase motivation and provide social support for screening patients. Conclusions: Additional research is needed to identify and test effective screening approaches for this underserved group at increased risk for CRC. Study results suggest that cancer risk and screening education, coupled with screening opportunities in the community, may yield increased screening rates. Interpretation: Lack of knowledge about CRC and CRC screening exists in the study population. Promoting screening across generations, developing and disseminating culturally appropriate educational materials within the community, and encouraging older individuals to screen to take care of their family may be appropriate interventions.",
author = "Griffith, {Kathleen A.} and Passmore, {Susan R.} and Domanic Smith and Jennifer Wenzel",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1188/12.ONF.299-306",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "299--306",
journal = "Oncology Nursing Forum",
issn = "0190-535X",
publisher = "Oncology Nursing Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - African Americans with a family history of colorectal cancer

T2 - Barriers and facilitators to screening

AU - Griffith, Kathleen A.

AU - Passmore, Susan R.

AU - Smith, Domanic

AU - Wenzel, Jennifer

PY - 2012/5

Y1 - 2012/5

N2 - Purpose/Objectives: To explore barriers and facilitators of screening for colorectal cancer (CRC), as well as suggestions for improving screening among African Americans with firstdegree relatives with CRC. Research Approach: A qualitative, descriptive approach involving focus groups. Setting: A community healthcare clinic in Baltimore, MD. Participants: 14 African American men and women aged 40 or older with at least one first-degree family member affected by CRC. Methodologic Approach: In-depth focus groups were conducted until thematic saturation was achieved. Thematic analysis and data reduction were conducted using ATLAS.ti, version 5.0. Main Research Variables: CRC screening barriers and facilitators. Findings: The participants were mostly male, insured, and had a parent with CRC. Commonly reported barriers to CRC screening included fear of serious illness, mistrust of the medical establishment, potential screening discomfort, lack of information on CRC risk factors, lack of healthcare access, absence of symptoms, no knowledge of CRC screening benefits, community reticence about cancer, and CRC myths. Facilitating factors for CRC screening included a belief of personal risk for CRC, physician recommendations, and acknowledgment of age as a risk factor. Suggestions to increase screening rates included distribution of culturally appropriate and community-based efforts (e.g., mobile units, church-based interventions). Participants also suggested ways to increase motivation and provide social support for screening patients. Conclusions: Additional research is needed to identify and test effective screening approaches for this underserved group at increased risk for CRC. Study results suggest that cancer risk and screening education, coupled with screening opportunities in the community, may yield increased screening rates. Interpretation: Lack of knowledge about CRC and CRC screening exists in the study population. Promoting screening across generations, developing and disseminating culturally appropriate educational materials within the community, and encouraging older individuals to screen to take care of their family may be appropriate interventions.

AB - Purpose/Objectives: To explore barriers and facilitators of screening for colorectal cancer (CRC), as well as suggestions for improving screening among African Americans with firstdegree relatives with CRC. Research Approach: A qualitative, descriptive approach involving focus groups. Setting: A community healthcare clinic in Baltimore, MD. Participants: 14 African American men and women aged 40 or older with at least one first-degree family member affected by CRC. Methodologic Approach: In-depth focus groups were conducted until thematic saturation was achieved. Thematic analysis and data reduction were conducted using ATLAS.ti, version 5.0. Main Research Variables: CRC screening barriers and facilitators. Findings: The participants were mostly male, insured, and had a parent with CRC. Commonly reported barriers to CRC screening included fear of serious illness, mistrust of the medical establishment, potential screening discomfort, lack of information on CRC risk factors, lack of healthcare access, absence of symptoms, no knowledge of CRC screening benefits, community reticence about cancer, and CRC myths. Facilitating factors for CRC screening included a belief of personal risk for CRC, physician recommendations, and acknowledgment of age as a risk factor. Suggestions to increase screening rates included distribution of culturally appropriate and community-based efforts (e.g., mobile units, church-based interventions). Participants also suggested ways to increase motivation and provide social support for screening patients. Conclusions: Additional research is needed to identify and test effective screening approaches for this underserved group at increased risk for CRC. Study results suggest that cancer risk and screening education, coupled with screening opportunities in the community, may yield increased screening rates. Interpretation: Lack of knowledge about CRC and CRC screening exists in the study population. Promoting screening across generations, developing and disseminating culturally appropriate educational materials within the community, and encouraging older individuals to screen to take care of their family may be appropriate interventions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865576447&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865576447&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1188/12.ONF.299-306

DO - 10.1188/12.ONF.299-306

M3 - Article

C2 - 22543388

AN - SCOPUS:84865576447

VL - 39

SP - 299

EP - 306

JO - Oncology Nursing Forum

JF - Oncology Nursing Forum

SN - 0190-535X

IS - 3

ER -