Aesthetic refinements in body contouring in the massive weight loss patient: Part 2. Arms

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The literature has witnessed an evolution in brachioplasty technique since the procedure was introduced by Thorek in 1930. Aesthetic refinements in brachioplasty have been increasingly described in the literature, and this has paralleled the rise in the massive weight loss population. The aim of this review is to share the plastic surgery experience with this challenging body region and present different approaches to achieve the best results for a broad spectrum of patients. Methods: A literature review studying brachioplasty was performed through PubMed. Throughout the literature there has been debate about scar placement, scar length, application of liposuction, drain placement, and optimization of outcomes, and differences of opinion have been compared. Results: There is no definitive best method of brachioplasty, as evidenced by multiple classification systems which present algorithms for management depending on presentation. Not only does approach differ depending on degree of presentation, but there are also different approaches depending on author for similar manifestations. Approaches vary through incision length, incision placement, and use of liposuction. Outcomes studies similarly reveal lack of consensus. Conclusion: This literature review has elucidated multiple approaches to brachioplasty, and the pearls and pitfalls described may all be incorporated to produce excellent outcomes and patient satisfaction in an individualized approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)726e-735e
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume134
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Esthetics
Lipectomy
Weight Loss
Cicatrix
Body Regions
Plastic Surgery
Patient Satisfaction
PubMed
Consensus
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Aesthetic refinements in body contouring in the massive weight loss patient : Part 2. Arms. / Shermak, Michele.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 134, No. 5, 2014, p. 726e-735e.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{78acf5de5c0c47069064240ea55db9b3,
title = "Aesthetic refinements in body contouring in the massive weight loss patient: Part 2. Arms",
abstract = "Background: The literature has witnessed an evolution in brachioplasty technique since the procedure was introduced by Thorek in 1930. Aesthetic refinements in brachioplasty have been increasingly described in the literature, and this has paralleled the rise in the massive weight loss population. The aim of this review is to share the plastic surgery experience with this challenging body region and present different approaches to achieve the best results for a broad spectrum of patients. Methods: A literature review studying brachioplasty was performed through PubMed. Throughout the literature there has been debate about scar placement, scar length, application of liposuction, drain placement, and optimization of outcomes, and differences of opinion have been compared. Results: There is no definitive best method of brachioplasty, as evidenced by multiple classification systems which present algorithms for management depending on presentation. Not only does approach differ depending on degree of presentation, but there are also different approaches depending on author for similar manifestations. Approaches vary through incision length, incision placement, and use of liposuction. Outcomes studies similarly reveal lack of consensus. Conclusion: This literature review has elucidated multiple approaches to brachioplasty, and the pearls and pitfalls described may all be incorporated to produce excellent outcomes and patient satisfaction in an individualized approach.",
author = "Michele Shermak",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0000000000000627",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "134",
pages = "726e--735e",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aesthetic refinements in body contouring in the massive weight loss patient

T2 - Part 2. Arms

AU - Shermak, Michele

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background: The literature has witnessed an evolution in brachioplasty technique since the procedure was introduced by Thorek in 1930. Aesthetic refinements in brachioplasty have been increasingly described in the literature, and this has paralleled the rise in the massive weight loss population. The aim of this review is to share the plastic surgery experience with this challenging body region and present different approaches to achieve the best results for a broad spectrum of patients. Methods: A literature review studying brachioplasty was performed through PubMed. Throughout the literature there has been debate about scar placement, scar length, application of liposuction, drain placement, and optimization of outcomes, and differences of opinion have been compared. Results: There is no definitive best method of brachioplasty, as evidenced by multiple classification systems which present algorithms for management depending on presentation. Not only does approach differ depending on degree of presentation, but there are also different approaches depending on author for similar manifestations. Approaches vary through incision length, incision placement, and use of liposuction. Outcomes studies similarly reveal lack of consensus. Conclusion: This literature review has elucidated multiple approaches to brachioplasty, and the pearls and pitfalls described may all be incorporated to produce excellent outcomes and patient satisfaction in an individualized approach.

AB - Background: The literature has witnessed an evolution in brachioplasty technique since the procedure was introduced by Thorek in 1930. Aesthetic refinements in brachioplasty have been increasingly described in the literature, and this has paralleled the rise in the massive weight loss population. The aim of this review is to share the plastic surgery experience with this challenging body region and present different approaches to achieve the best results for a broad spectrum of patients. Methods: A literature review studying brachioplasty was performed through PubMed. Throughout the literature there has been debate about scar placement, scar length, application of liposuction, drain placement, and optimization of outcomes, and differences of opinion have been compared. Results: There is no definitive best method of brachioplasty, as evidenced by multiple classification systems which present algorithms for management depending on presentation. Not only does approach differ depending on degree of presentation, but there are also different approaches depending on author for similar manifestations. Approaches vary through incision length, incision placement, and use of liposuction. Outcomes studies similarly reveal lack of consensus. Conclusion: This literature review has elucidated multiple approaches to brachioplasty, and the pearls and pitfalls described may all be incorporated to produce excellent outcomes and patient satisfaction in an individualized approach.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925027241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925027241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000627

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000627

M3 - Article

C2 - 25347647

AN - SCOPUS:84925027241

VL - 134

SP - 726e-735e

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 5

ER -