Adverse Childhood Experiences: Expanding the Concept of Adversity

Peter F. Cronholm, Christine M. Forke, Roy Wade, Megan H. Bair-Merritt, Martha Davis, Mary Harkins-Schwarz, Lee M. Pachter, Joel A. Fein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction Current knowledge of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) relies on data predominantly collected from white, middle- / upper-middle-class participants and focuses on experiences within the home. Using a more socioeconomically and racially diverse urban population, Conventional and Expanded (community-level) ACEs were measured to help understand whether Conventional ACEs alone can sufficiently measure adversity, particularly among various subgroups. Methods Participants from a previous large, representative, community-based health survey in Southeast Pennsylvania who were aged ≥18 years were contacted between November 2012 and January 2013 to complete another phone survey measuring ACEs. Ordinal logistic regression models were used to test associations between Conventional and Expanded ACEs scores and demographic characteristics. Analysis was conducted in 2013 and 2014. Results Of 1,784 respondents, 72.9% had at least one Conventional ACE, 63.4% at least one Expanded ACE, and 49.3% experienced both. A total of 13.9% experienced only Expanded ACEs and would have gone unrecognized if only Conventional ACEs were assessed. Certain demographic characteristics were associated with higher risk for Conventional ACEs but were not predictive of Expanded ACEs, and vice versa. Few adversities were associated with both Conventional and Expanded ACEs. Conclusions To more accurately represent the level of adversity experienced across various sociodemographic groups, these data support extending the Conventional ACEs measure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number4343
Pages (from-to)354-361
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume49
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Logistic Models
Demography
Urban Population
Health Surveys
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Cronholm, P. F., Forke, C. M., Wade, R., Bair-Merritt, M. H., Davis, M., Harkins-Schwarz, M., ... Fein, J. A. (2015). Adverse Childhood Experiences: Expanding the Concept of Adversity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 49(3), 354-361. [4343]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.001

Adverse Childhood Experiences : Expanding the Concept of Adversity. / Cronholm, Peter F.; Forke, Christine M.; Wade, Roy; Bair-Merritt, Megan H.; Davis, Martha; Harkins-Schwarz, Mary; Pachter, Lee M.; Fein, Joel A.

In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 49, No. 3, 4343, 01.09.2015, p. 354-361.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cronholm, PF, Forke, CM, Wade, R, Bair-Merritt, MH, Davis, M, Harkins-Schwarz, M, Pachter, LM & Fein, JA 2015, 'Adverse Childhood Experiences: Expanding the Concept of Adversity', American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 49, no. 3, 4343, pp. 354-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.001
Cronholm PF, Forke CM, Wade R, Bair-Merritt MH, Davis M, Harkins-Schwarz M et al. Adverse Childhood Experiences: Expanding the Concept of Adversity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2015 Sep 1;49(3):354-361. 4343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.001
Cronholm, Peter F. ; Forke, Christine M. ; Wade, Roy ; Bair-Merritt, Megan H. ; Davis, Martha ; Harkins-Schwarz, Mary ; Pachter, Lee M. ; Fein, Joel A. / Adverse Childhood Experiences : Expanding the Concept of Adversity. In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 49, No. 3. pp. 354-361.
@article{99341d4642a6421eaca77d1de3afa864,
title = "Adverse Childhood Experiences: Expanding the Concept of Adversity",
abstract = "Introduction Current knowledge of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) relies on data predominantly collected from white, middle- / upper-middle-class participants and focuses on experiences within the home. Using a more socioeconomically and racially diverse urban population, Conventional and Expanded (community-level) ACEs were measured to help understand whether Conventional ACEs alone can sufficiently measure adversity, particularly among various subgroups. Methods Participants from a previous large, representative, community-based health survey in Southeast Pennsylvania who were aged ≥18 years were contacted between November 2012 and January 2013 to complete another phone survey measuring ACEs. Ordinal logistic regression models were used to test associations between Conventional and Expanded ACEs scores and demographic characteristics. Analysis was conducted in 2013 and 2014. Results Of 1,784 respondents, 72.9{\%} had at least one Conventional ACE, 63.4{\%} at least one Expanded ACE, and 49.3{\%} experienced both. A total of 13.9{\%} experienced only Expanded ACEs and would have gone unrecognized if only Conventional ACEs were assessed. Certain demographic characteristics were associated with higher risk for Conventional ACEs but were not predictive of Expanded ACEs, and vice versa. Few adversities were associated with both Conventional and Expanded ACEs. Conclusions To more accurately represent the level of adversity experienced across various sociodemographic groups, these data support extending the Conventional ACEs measure.",
author = "Cronholm, {Peter F.} and Forke, {Christine M.} and Roy Wade and Bair-Merritt, {Megan H.} and Martha Davis and Mary Harkins-Schwarz and Pachter, {Lee M.} and Fein, {Joel A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "354--361",
journal = "American Journal of Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0749-3797",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adverse Childhood Experiences

T2 - Expanding the Concept of Adversity

AU - Cronholm, Peter F.

AU - Forke, Christine M.

AU - Wade, Roy

AU - Bair-Merritt, Megan H.

AU - Davis, Martha

AU - Harkins-Schwarz, Mary

AU - Pachter, Lee M.

AU - Fein, Joel A.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Introduction Current knowledge of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) relies on data predominantly collected from white, middle- / upper-middle-class participants and focuses on experiences within the home. Using a more socioeconomically and racially diverse urban population, Conventional and Expanded (community-level) ACEs were measured to help understand whether Conventional ACEs alone can sufficiently measure adversity, particularly among various subgroups. Methods Participants from a previous large, representative, community-based health survey in Southeast Pennsylvania who were aged ≥18 years were contacted between November 2012 and January 2013 to complete another phone survey measuring ACEs. Ordinal logistic regression models were used to test associations between Conventional and Expanded ACEs scores and demographic characteristics. Analysis was conducted in 2013 and 2014. Results Of 1,784 respondents, 72.9% had at least one Conventional ACE, 63.4% at least one Expanded ACE, and 49.3% experienced both. A total of 13.9% experienced only Expanded ACEs and would have gone unrecognized if only Conventional ACEs were assessed. Certain demographic characteristics were associated with higher risk for Conventional ACEs but were not predictive of Expanded ACEs, and vice versa. Few adversities were associated with both Conventional and Expanded ACEs. Conclusions To more accurately represent the level of adversity experienced across various sociodemographic groups, these data support extending the Conventional ACEs measure.

AB - Introduction Current knowledge of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) relies on data predominantly collected from white, middle- / upper-middle-class participants and focuses on experiences within the home. Using a more socioeconomically and racially diverse urban population, Conventional and Expanded (community-level) ACEs were measured to help understand whether Conventional ACEs alone can sufficiently measure adversity, particularly among various subgroups. Methods Participants from a previous large, representative, community-based health survey in Southeast Pennsylvania who were aged ≥18 years were contacted between November 2012 and January 2013 to complete another phone survey measuring ACEs. Ordinal logistic regression models were used to test associations between Conventional and Expanded ACEs scores and demographic characteristics. Analysis was conducted in 2013 and 2014. Results Of 1,784 respondents, 72.9% had at least one Conventional ACE, 63.4% at least one Expanded ACE, and 49.3% experienced both. A total of 13.9% experienced only Expanded ACEs and would have gone unrecognized if only Conventional ACEs were assessed. Certain demographic characteristics were associated with higher risk for Conventional ACEs but were not predictive of Expanded ACEs, and vice versa. Few adversities were associated with both Conventional and Expanded ACEs. Conclusions To more accurately represent the level of adversity experienced across various sociodemographic groups, these data support extending the Conventional ACEs measure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941330137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941330137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.001

DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 26296440

AN - SCOPUS:84941330137

VL - 49

SP - 354

EP - 361

JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

SN - 0749-3797

IS - 3

M1 - 4343

ER -