Advances in the selection of patients with prostate cancer for active surveillance

James L. Liu, Hiten D. Patel, Nora M. Haney, Jonathan I. Epstein, Alan W. Partin

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Early identification and management of prostate cancer completely changed with the discovery of prostate-specific antigen. However, improved detection has also led to overdiagnosis and consequently overtreatment of patients with low-risk disease. Strategies for the management of patients using active surveillance — the monitoring of clinically insignificant disease until intervention is warranted — were developed in response to this issue. The success of this approach is critically dependent on the accurate selection of patients who are predicted to be at the lowest risk of prostate cancer mortality. The Epstein criteria for clinically insignificant prostate cancer were first published in 1994 and have been repeatedly validated for risk-stratification and selection for active surveillance over the past few decades. Current active surveillance programmes use modified criteria with 30–50% of patients receiving treatment at 10 years. Nonetheless, tools for prostate cancer diagnosis have continued to evolve with improvements in biopsy format and targeting, advances in imaging technologies such as multiparametric MRI, and the identification of serum-, tissue- and urine-based biomarkers. These advances have the potential to further improve the identification of men with low-risk disease who can be appropriately managed using active surveillance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalNature Reviews Urology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Advances in the selection of patients with prostate cancer for active surveillance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this