TY - JOUR
T1 - Advance Directives, Medical Conditions, and Preferences for End-of-Life Care Among Physicians
T2 - 12-year Follow-Up of the Johns Hopkins Precursors Study
AU - Gallo, Joseph J.
AU - Abshire, Martha
AU - Hwang, Seungyoung
AU - Nolan, Marie T.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. This work was supported by the National Institute of Nursing Research ( R01 NR014068 ). The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
PY - 2019/3
Y1 - 2019/3
N2 - Context: Stability of preferences for life-sustaining treatment may vary depending on personal characteristics. Objective: We estimated the stability of preferences for end-of-life treatment over 12 years and whether advance directives and medical conditions were associated with change in preferences for end-of-life treatment. Design: Mailed survey of older physicians. Methods: Longitudinal cohort study of medical students in the graduating classes from 1948 to 1964 at Johns Hopkins University. Eight hundred ninety eight physicians who completed the life-sustaining treatment questionnaire anytime in 1999, 2002, 2005, and 2011 (mean age 68.2 years at baseline). Preferences for life-sustaining treatment were assessed using a checklist questionnaire in response to a standard “brain injury” scenario and considered as a package using the latent class transition model. Results: End-of-life preferences grouped into three classes: most aggressive (wanting most interventions; 14% of physicians), least aggressive (declining most interventions; 61%), and an intermediate class (declining most interventions except intravenous fluids and antibiotics; 25%). Physicians without an advance directive were more likely to desire more treatment and were less likely to transition out the most aggressive class. Transition probabilities from class to class did not vary over time. Persons with cancer expressed preference for the least aggressive treatment, whereas persons with cardiovascular disease and depression had preferences for more aggressive treatment. Conclusion: Transitions in end-of-life preferences and the factors influencing change and stability suggest that periodic reassessment for planning end-of-life care is needed.
AB - Context: Stability of preferences for life-sustaining treatment may vary depending on personal characteristics. Objective: We estimated the stability of preferences for end-of-life treatment over 12 years and whether advance directives and medical conditions were associated with change in preferences for end-of-life treatment. Design: Mailed survey of older physicians. Methods: Longitudinal cohort study of medical students in the graduating classes from 1948 to 1964 at Johns Hopkins University. Eight hundred ninety eight physicians who completed the life-sustaining treatment questionnaire anytime in 1999, 2002, 2005, and 2011 (mean age 68.2 years at baseline). Preferences for life-sustaining treatment were assessed using a checklist questionnaire in response to a standard “brain injury” scenario and considered as a package using the latent class transition model. Results: End-of-life preferences grouped into three classes: most aggressive (wanting most interventions; 14% of physicians), least aggressive (declining most interventions; 61%), and an intermediate class (declining most interventions except intravenous fluids and antibiotics; 25%). Physicians without an advance directive were more likely to desire more treatment and were less likely to transition out the most aggressive class. Transition probabilities from class to class did not vary over time. Persons with cancer expressed preference for the least aggressive treatment, whereas persons with cardiovascular disease and depression had preferences for more aggressive treatment. Conclusion: Transitions in end-of-life preferences and the factors influencing change and stability suggest that periodic reassessment for planning end-of-life care is needed.
KW - End-of-life preferences
KW - advance directives
KW - latent transition analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061610402&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061610402&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.12.328
DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.12.328
M3 - Article
C2 - 30576712
AN - SCOPUS:85061610402
VL - 57
SP - 556
EP - 565
JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
SN - 0885-3924
IS - 3
ER -