Adoption of electronic health records and preparations for demonstrating meaningful use: An american academy of ophthalmology survey

Michael Boland, Michael F. Chiang, Michele C. Lim, Linda Wedemeyer, K. David Epley, Colin A. McCannel, David E. Silverstone, Flora Lum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To assess the current state of electronic health record (EHR) use by ophthalmologists, including adoption rate, user satisfaction, functionality, benefits, barriers, and knowledge of meaningful use criteria. Design: Population-based, cross-sectional study. Participants: A total of 492 members of the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO). Methods: A random sample of 1500 AAO members were selected on the basis of their practice location and solicited to participate in a study of EHR use, practice management, and image management system use. Participants completed the survey via the Internet, phone, or fax. The survey included questions about the adoption of EHRs, available functionality, benefits, barriers, satisfaction, and understanding of meaningful use criteria and health information technology concepts. Main Outcome Measures: Current adoption rate of EHRs, user satisfaction, benefits and barriers, and availability of EHR functionality. Results: Overall, 32% of the practices surveyed had already implemented an EHR, 15% had implemented an EHR for some of their physicians or were in the process of implementation, and another 31% had plans to do so within 2 years. Among those with an EHR in their practice, 49% were satisfied or extremely satisfied with their system, 42% reported increased or stable overall productivity, 19% reported decreased or stable overall costs, and 55% would recommend an EHR to a fellow ophthalmologist. For those with an electronic image management system, only 15% had all devices integrated, 33% had images directly uploaded into their system, and 12% had electronic association of patient demographics with the image. Conclusions: The adoption of EHRs by ophthalmology practices more than doubled from 2007 to 2011. The satisfaction of ophthalmologists with their EHR and their perception of beneficial effects on productivity and costs were all lower in 2011 than in 2007. Knowledge about meaningful use is high, but the percentage of physicians actually receiving incentive payments is relatively low. Given the importance of imaging in ophthalmology, the shortcomings in current image management systems need to be addressed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1702-1710
Number of pages9
JournalOphthalmology
Volume120
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2013

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Ophthalmology
Telefacsimile
Physicians
Costs and Cost Analysis
Medical Informatics
Surveys and Questionnaires
Practice Management
Internet
Motivation
Cross-Sectional Studies
Demography
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Equipment and Supplies
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Adoption of electronic health records and preparations for demonstrating meaningful use : An american academy of ophthalmology survey. / Boland, Michael; Chiang, Michael F.; Lim, Michele C.; Wedemeyer, Linda; Epley, K. David; McCannel, Colin A.; Silverstone, David E.; Lum, Flora.

In: Ophthalmology, Vol. 120, No. 8, 08.2013, p. 1702-1710.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Boland, Michael ; Chiang, Michael F. ; Lim, Michele C. ; Wedemeyer, Linda ; Epley, K. David ; McCannel, Colin A. ; Silverstone, David E. ; Lum, Flora. / Adoption of electronic health records and preparations for demonstrating meaningful use : An american academy of ophthalmology survey. In: Ophthalmology. 2013 ; Vol. 120, No. 8. pp. 1702-1710.
@article{965e41e76cd947cda9e609823e0036db,
title = "Adoption of electronic health records and preparations for demonstrating meaningful use: An american academy of ophthalmology survey",
abstract = "Objective: To assess the current state of electronic health record (EHR) use by ophthalmologists, including adoption rate, user satisfaction, functionality, benefits, barriers, and knowledge of meaningful use criteria. Design: Population-based, cross-sectional study. Participants: A total of 492 members of the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO). Methods: A random sample of 1500 AAO members were selected on the basis of their practice location and solicited to participate in a study of EHR use, practice management, and image management system use. Participants completed the survey via the Internet, phone, or fax. The survey included questions about the adoption of EHRs, available functionality, benefits, barriers, satisfaction, and understanding of meaningful use criteria and health information technology concepts. Main Outcome Measures: Current adoption rate of EHRs, user satisfaction, benefits and barriers, and availability of EHR functionality. Results: Overall, 32{\%} of the practices surveyed had already implemented an EHR, 15{\%} had implemented an EHR for some of their physicians or were in the process of implementation, and another 31{\%} had plans to do so within 2 years. Among those with an EHR in their practice, 49{\%} were satisfied or extremely satisfied with their system, 42{\%} reported increased or stable overall productivity, 19{\%} reported decreased or stable overall costs, and 55{\%} would recommend an EHR to a fellow ophthalmologist. For those with an electronic image management system, only 15{\%} had all devices integrated, 33{\%} had images directly uploaded into their system, and 12{\%} had electronic association of patient demographics with the image. Conclusions: The adoption of EHRs by ophthalmology practices more than doubled from 2007 to 2011. The satisfaction of ophthalmologists with their EHR and their perception of beneficial effects on productivity and costs were all lower in 2011 than in 2007. Knowledge about meaningful use is high, but the percentage of physicians actually receiving incentive payments is relatively low. Given the importance of imaging in ophthalmology, the shortcomings in current image management systems need to be addressed.",
author = "Michael Boland and Chiang, {Michael F.} and Lim, {Michele C.} and Linda Wedemeyer and Epley, {K. David} and McCannel, {Colin A.} and Silverstone, {David E.} and Flora Lum",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.04.029",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "120",
pages = "1702--1710",
journal = "Ophthalmology",
issn = "0161-6420",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adoption of electronic health records and preparations for demonstrating meaningful use

T2 - An american academy of ophthalmology survey

AU - Boland, Michael

AU - Chiang, Michael F.

AU - Lim, Michele C.

AU - Wedemeyer, Linda

AU - Epley, K. David

AU - McCannel, Colin A.

AU - Silverstone, David E.

AU - Lum, Flora

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - Objective: To assess the current state of electronic health record (EHR) use by ophthalmologists, including adoption rate, user satisfaction, functionality, benefits, barriers, and knowledge of meaningful use criteria. Design: Population-based, cross-sectional study. Participants: A total of 492 members of the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO). Methods: A random sample of 1500 AAO members were selected on the basis of their practice location and solicited to participate in a study of EHR use, practice management, and image management system use. Participants completed the survey via the Internet, phone, or fax. The survey included questions about the adoption of EHRs, available functionality, benefits, barriers, satisfaction, and understanding of meaningful use criteria and health information technology concepts. Main Outcome Measures: Current adoption rate of EHRs, user satisfaction, benefits and barriers, and availability of EHR functionality. Results: Overall, 32% of the practices surveyed had already implemented an EHR, 15% had implemented an EHR for some of their physicians or were in the process of implementation, and another 31% had plans to do so within 2 years. Among those with an EHR in their practice, 49% were satisfied or extremely satisfied with their system, 42% reported increased or stable overall productivity, 19% reported decreased or stable overall costs, and 55% would recommend an EHR to a fellow ophthalmologist. For those with an electronic image management system, only 15% had all devices integrated, 33% had images directly uploaded into their system, and 12% had electronic association of patient demographics with the image. Conclusions: The adoption of EHRs by ophthalmology practices more than doubled from 2007 to 2011. The satisfaction of ophthalmologists with their EHR and their perception of beneficial effects on productivity and costs were all lower in 2011 than in 2007. Knowledge about meaningful use is high, but the percentage of physicians actually receiving incentive payments is relatively low. Given the importance of imaging in ophthalmology, the shortcomings in current image management systems need to be addressed.

AB - Objective: To assess the current state of electronic health record (EHR) use by ophthalmologists, including adoption rate, user satisfaction, functionality, benefits, barriers, and knowledge of meaningful use criteria. Design: Population-based, cross-sectional study. Participants: A total of 492 members of the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO). Methods: A random sample of 1500 AAO members were selected on the basis of their practice location and solicited to participate in a study of EHR use, practice management, and image management system use. Participants completed the survey via the Internet, phone, or fax. The survey included questions about the adoption of EHRs, available functionality, benefits, barriers, satisfaction, and understanding of meaningful use criteria and health information technology concepts. Main Outcome Measures: Current adoption rate of EHRs, user satisfaction, benefits and barriers, and availability of EHR functionality. Results: Overall, 32% of the practices surveyed had already implemented an EHR, 15% had implemented an EHR for some of their physicians or were in the process of implementation, and another 31% had plans to do so within 2 years. Among those with an EHR in their practice, 49% were satisfied or extremely satisfied with their system, 42% reported increased or stable overall productivity, 19% reported decreased or stable overall costs, and 55% would recommend an EHR to a fellow ophthalmologist. For those with an electronic image management system, only 15% had all devices integrated, 33% had images directly uploaded into their system, and 12% had electronic association of patient demographics with the image. Conclusions: The adoption of EHRs by ophthalmology practices more than doubled from 2007 to 2011. The satisfaction of ophthalmologists with their EHR and their perception of beneficial effects on productivity and costs were all lower in 2011 than in 2007. Knowledge about meaningful use is high, but the percentage of physicians actually receiving incentive payments is relatively low. Given the importance of imaging in ophthalmology, the shortcomings in current image management systems need to be addressed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881136310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881136310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.04.029

DO - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.04.029

M3 - Article

C2 - 23806425

AN - SCOPUS:84881136310

VL - 120

SP - 1702

EP - 1710

JO - Ophthalmology

JF - Ophthalmology

SN - 0161-6420

IS - 8

ER -