TY - JOUR
T1 - Adolescents and asthma
T2 - Why bother with our meds?
AU - Naimi, David R.
AU - Freedman, Tovia G.
AU - Ginsburg, Kenneth R.
AU - Bogen, Daniel
AU - Rand, Cynthia S.
AU - Apter, Andrea J.
N1 - Funding Information:
D. R. Naimi is supported by the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Sepracor Research Excellence Award and A. J. Apter is supported by grants HL070392 and HL088469.
Funding Information:
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: D. R. Naimi received the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Sepracor Research Excellence Award. D. Bogen received grant support from the National Institutes of Health. C. S. Rand is on the advisory board for the Merck Foundation/HCAN and on the leadership council for Schering-Plough. A. J. Apter received grant support from the National Institutes of Health/National Heart Lung Blood Institute. The rest of the authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest.
PY - 2009/6
Y1 - 2009/6
N2 - Background: Adherence to inhaled steroid regimens for asthma is poor in adults and children. Although it is assumed that nonadherence contributes to morbidity in older adolescents, investigation is limited. Objective: We sought to describe adherence to preventive asthma medications and explore relevant beliefs and attitudes in older urban adolescents, including their ideas for improving adherence. Methods: Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to collect data from a convenience sample of adolescents with asthma previously prescribed fluticasone/salmeterol (F/S). Two semistructured face-to-face interviews were conducted 1 month apart and analyzed for themes. F/S use was electronically monitored between visits and calculated as the number of actuations divided by the number of inhalations prescribed. Results: Forty participants, (15-18 years of age, 19 female subjects, 30 black/African American subjects, 11 Medicaid-insured subjects, and 24 previously hospitalized for asthma) with a median FEV1 of 98% of predicted value (range, 67% to 127%) had median adherence of 43% (range, 4% to 89%). Adherence was not associated with FEV1 or emergency department visits. Themes emerged from interviews as follows. Teens (1) take F/S inconsistently; (2) believe F/S is "supposed to help me breathe"; (3) dislike its taste; (4) are "too busy" and "forget"; and (5) recommend "reminder" solutions to poor adherence. Twenty percent believed that taking F/S was unnecessary, and another 18% expressed ambivalence about its benefits. Conclusion: Adherence was poor. Examining and acknowledging health beliefs of older teens in the context of their complicated lives might facilitate discussions about self-management.
AB - Background: Adherence to inhaled steroid regimens for asthma is poor in adults and children. Although it is assumed that nonadherence contributes to morbidity in older adolescents, investigation is limited. Objective: We sought to describe adherence to preventive asthma medications and explore relevant beliefs and attitudes in older urban adolescents, including their ideas for improving adherence. Methods: Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to collect data from a convenience sample of adolescents with asthma previously prescribed fluticasone/salmeterol (F/S). Two semistructured face-to-face interviews were conducted 1 month apart and analyzed for themes. F/S use was electronically monitored between visits and calculated as the number of actuations divided by the number of inhalations prescribed. Results: Forty participants, (15-18 years of age, 19 female subjects, 30 black/African American subjects, 11 Medicaid-insured subjects, and 24 previously hospitalized for asthma) with a median FEV1 of 98% of predicted value (range, 67% to 127%) had median adherence of 43% (range, 4% to 89%). Adherence was not associated with FEV1 or emergency department visits. Themes emerged from interviews as follows. Teens (1) take F/S inconsistently; (2) believe F/S is "supposed to help me breathe"; (3) dislike its taste; (4) are "too busy" and "forget"; and (5) recommend "reminder" solutions to poor adherence. Twenty percent believed that taking F/S was unnecessary, and another 18% expressed ambivalence about its benefits. Conclusion: Adherence was poor. Examining and acknowledging health beliefs of older teens in the context of their complicated lives might facilitate discussions about self-management.
KW - Asthma
KW - adherence
KW - adolescent
KW - inhaled corticosteroid
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649236061&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649236061&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.02.022
DO - 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.02.022
M3 - Article
C2 - 19395075
AN - SCOPUS:67649236061
SN - 0091-6749
VL - 123
SP - 1335
EP - 1341
JO - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
JF - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
IS - 6
ER -