Adherence to universal (Barrier) precautions during interventions on critically 111 and injured emergency department patients

Gabor D Kelen, Thomas A. Digiovanna, David D Celentano, David Kalainov, Leslie Bisson, Edward Junkins, Allen Stein, Lisa Lofy, Carol R J Scott, Keith T. Sivertson, Thomas C Quinn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In a study undertaken to determine compliance with Universal Precautions, we observed 129 personnel performing 1, 274 interventions on 151 consecutive critically ill and injured patients in an emergency department setting in July 1988. Barrier precautions were fully adhered to 44.0% of the time. During interventions in patients with profuse bleeding, adherence was only 19.5% in contrast to 44.7% for those who were not bleeding. Adherence was 56.4% during minor interventions but only 16.7% during major procedures. Adherence rates varied among health care providers: residents, 58%; emergency staff physicians, 38%; consultant physicians, 43%; emergency nursing staff, 44%; paramedics, 8%; radiology technicians, 14%; and housekeeping, 91%. In a follow-up questionnaire that ascertained reasons for lack of compliance, 47% of providers indicated that there was not always sufficient time to put on protective material, 33% felt that precautions interfered with skillful performance of procedures, and 23% stated that materials were uncomfortable. Only 2.7% felt that Universal Precautions did not work. Since there is no proven postexposure prophylaxis for human immunodeficiency virus, Universal Precautions must be rigorously followed until such time as they are shown not to be effective or an alternate approach is developed. Strategies to improve compliance and improvements in barrier technology need to be developed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)987-994
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
Volume3
Issue number10
StatePublished - 1990

Fingerprint

Universal Precautions
Hospital Emergency Service
Compliance
Emergency Nursing
Hemorrhage
Physicians
Housekeeping
Allied Health Personnel
Nursing Staff
Consultants
Radiology
Critical Illness
Health Personnel
Emergencies
HIV
Technology

Keywords

  • Emergency
  • Health care workers
  • Human immunodeficiency virus type 1
  • Infection control
  • Universal Precautions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Pharmacology (medical)
  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Virology

Cite this

Adherence to universal (Barrier) precautions during interventions on critically 111 and injured emergency department patients. / Kelen, Gabor D; Digiovanna, Thomas A.; Celentano, David D; Kalainov, David; Bisson, Leslie; Junkins, Edward; Stein, Allen; Lofy, Lisa; Scott, Carol R J; Sivertson, Keith T.; Quinn, Thomas C.

In: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, Vol. 3, No. 10, 1990, p. 987-994.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kelen, GD, Digiovanna, TA, Celentano, DD, Kalainov, D, Bisson, L, Junkins, E, Stein, A, Lofy, L, Scott, CRJ, Sivertson, KT & Quinn, TC 1990, 'Adherence to universal (Barrier) precautions during interventions on critically 111 and injured emergency department patients', Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 987-994.
Kelen, Gabor D ; Digiovanna, Thomas A. ; Celentano, David D ; Kalainov, David ; Bisson, Leslie ; Junkins, Edward ; Stein, Allen ; Lofy, Lisa ; Scott, Carol R J ; Sivertson, Keith T. ; Quinn, Thomas C. / Adherence to universal (Barrier) precautions during interventions on critically 111 and injured emergency department patients. In: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 1990 ; Vol. 3, No. 10. pp. 987-994.
@article{e0acc5f243814baa9bee1382098271a6,
title = "Adherence to universal (Barrier) precautions during interventions on critically 111 and injured emergency department patients",
abstract = "In a study undertaken to determine compliance with Universal Precautions, we observed 129 personnel performing 1, 274 interventions on 151 consecutive critically ill and injured patients in an emergency department setting in July 1988. Barrier precautions were fully adhered to 44.0{\%} of the time. During interventions in patients with profuse bleeding, adherence was only 19.5{\%} in contrast to 44.7{\%} for those who were not bleeding. Adherence was 56.4{\%} during minor interventions but only 16.7{\%} during major procedures. Adherence rates varied among health care providers: residents, 58{\%}; emergency staff physicians, 38{\%}; consultant physicians, 43{\%}; emergency nursing staff, 44{\%}; paramedics, 8{\%}; radiology technicians, 14{\%}; and housekeeping, 91{\%}. In a follow-up questionnaire that ascertained reasons for lack of compliance, 47{\%} of providers indicated that there was not always sufficient time to put on protective material, 33{\%} felt that precautions interfered with skillful performance of procedures, and 23{\%} stated that materials were uncomfortable. Only 2.7{\%} felt that Universal Precautions did not work. Since there is no proven postexposure prophylaxis for human immunodeficiency virus, Universal Precautions must be rigorously followed until such time as they are shown not to be effective or an alternate approach is developed. Strategies to improve compliance and improvements in barrier technology need to be developed.",
keywords = "Emergency, Health care workers, Human immunodeficiency virus type 1, Infection control, Universal Precautions",
author = "Kelen, {Gabor D} and Digiovanna, {Thomas A.} and Celentano, {David D} and David Kalainov and Leslie Bisson and Edward Junkins and Allen Stein and Lisa Lofy and Scott, {Carol R J} and Sivertson, {Keith T.} and Quinn, {Thomas C}",
year = "1990",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "987--994",
journal = "Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes",
issn = "1525-4135",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adherence to universal (Barrier) precautions during interventions on critically 111 and injured emergency department patients

AU - Kelen, Gabor D

AU - Digiovanna, Thomas A.

AU - Celentano, David D

AU - Kalainov, David

AU - Bisson, Leslie

AU - Junkins, Edward

AU - Stein, Allen

AU - Lofy, Lisa

AU - Scott, Carol R J

AU - Sivertson, Keith T.

AU - Quinn, Thomas C

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - In a study undertaken to determine compliance with Universal Precautions, we observed 129 personnel performing 1, 274 interventions on 151 consecutive critically ill and injured patients in an emergency department setting in July 1988. Barrier precautions were fully adhered to 44.0% of the time. During interventions in patients with profuse bleeding, adherence was only 19.5% in contrast to 44.7% for those who were not bleeding. Adherence was 56.4% during minor interventions but only 16.7% during major procedures. Adherence rates varied among health care providers: residents, 58%; emergency staff physicians, 38%; consultant physicians, 43%; emergency nursing staff, 44%; paramedics, 8%; radiology technicians, 14%; and housekeeping, 91%. In a follow-up questionnaire that ascertained reasons for lack of compliance, 47% of providers indicated that there was not always sufficient time to put on protective material, 33% felt that precautions interfered with skillful performance of procedures, and 23% stated that materials were uncomfortable. Only 2.7% felt that Universal Precautions did not work. Since there is no proven postexposure prophylaxis for human immunodeficiency virus, Universal Precautions must be rigorously followed until such time as they are shown not to be effective or an alternate approach is developed. Strategies to improve compliance and improvements in barrier technology need to be developed.

AB - In a study undertaken to determine compliance with Universal Precautions, we observed 129 personnel performing 1, 274 interventions on 151 consecutive critically ill and injured patients in an emergency department setting in July 1988. Barrier precautions were fully adhered to 44.0% of the time. During interventions in patients with profuse bleeding, adherence was only 19.5% in contrast to 44.7% for those who were not bleeding. Adherence was 56.4% during minor interventions but only 16.7% during major procedures. Adherence rates varied among health care providers: residents, 58%; emergency staff physicians, 38%; consultant physicians, 43%; emergency nursing staff, 44%; paramedics, 8%; radiology technicians, 14%; and housekeeping, 91%. In a follow-up questionnaire that ascertained reasons for lack of compliance, 47% of providers indicated that there was not always sufficient time to put on protective material, 33% felt that precautions interfered with skillful performance of procedures, and 23% stated that materials were uncomfortable. Only 2.7% felt that Universal Precautions did not work. Since there is no proven postexposure prophylaxis for human immunodeficiency virus, Universal Precautions must be rigorously followed until such time as they are shown not to be effective or an alternate approach is developed. Strategies to improve compliance and improvements in barrier technology need to be developed.

KW - Emergency

KW - Health care workers

KW - Human immunodeficiency virus type 1

KW - Infection control

KW - Universal Precautions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025000420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025000420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2398462

AN - SCOPUS:0025000420

VL - 3

SP - 987

EP - 994

JO - Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes

JF - Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes

SN - 1525-4135

IS - 10

ER -