Addressing the Adherence-Adaptation Debate: Lessons from the Replication of an Evidence-Based Sexual Health Program in School Settings

Jenita Parekh, Elizabeth Stuart, Robert W Blum, Valerie Caldas, Brooke Whitfield, Jacky Jennings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Whether high adherence to programs is necessary to achieve program outcomes is an area of great debate. The objectives of this study were to determine the frequency, type, and rationale of adaptations made in the implementation of an evidence-based program and to determine program outcomes for intervention program participants, as compared to comparison participants, by the level of adaptations. A total of 1608 participants in 45 classrooms participated. Percent adaptations was calculated by classroom. Thematic qualitative analysis was used to categorize types and rationales for adaptations. Program outcomes by level of adaptations were determined using logistic regression analyses and mean differences. Propensity score matching methods were used to create comparability between adaptation subgroup participants and comparison participants. Adaptations ranged from 2 to 97% across classrooms, with mean adaptations of 63%. Thematic analysis revealed that the adaptations made were related to delivery of content, rather than to the content itself and in response to participant needs and setting constraints. Program outcomes did not appear to be reduced for the high-adaptation subgroup. Understanding both rationale (intent) and type of adaptation made is crucial to understanding the complexity of adaptations. These finding support the argument for allowing facilitators some flexibility and autonomy to adapt the delivery of prescribed content to participant needs and setting constraints.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1074-1088
Number of pages15
JournalPrevention Science
Volume20
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 15 2019

Fingerprint

Propensity Score
Reproductive Health
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • Adolescents
  • Evidence-based program
  • Program implementation
  • Program implementation fidelity
  • Sexual and reproductive health programs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Addressing the Adherence-Adaptation Debate : Lessons from the Replication of an Evidence-Based Sexual Health Program in School Settings. / Parekh, Jenita; Stuart, Elizabeth; Blum, Robert W; Caldas, Valerie; Whitfield, Brooke; Jennings, Jacky.

In: Prevention Science, Vol. 20, No. 7, 15.10.2019, p. 1074-1088.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{df5e9278acc6420281628f66ec5e51d9,
title = "Addressing the Adherence-Adaptation Debate: Lessons from the Replication of an Evidence-Based Sexual Health Program in School Settings",
abstract = "Whether high adherence to programs is necessary to achieve program outcomes is an area of great debate. The objectives of this study were to determine the frequency, type, and rationale of adaptations made in the implementation of an evidence-based program and to determine program outcomes for intervention program participants, as compared to comparison participants, by the level of adaptations. A total of 1608 participants in 45 classrooms participated. Percent adaptations was calculated by classroom. Thematic qualitative analysis was used to categorize types and rationales for adaptations. Program outcomes by level of adaptations were determined using logistic regression analyses and mean differences. Propensity score matching methods were used to create comparability between adaptation subgroup participants and comparison participants. Adaptations ranged from 2 to 97{\%} across classrooms, with mean adaptations of 63{\%}. Thematic analysis revealed that the adaptations made were related to delivery of content, rather than to the content itself and in response to participant needs and setting constraints. Program outcomes did not appear to be reduced for the high-adaptation subgroup. Understanding both rationale (intent) and type of adaptation made is crucial to understanding the complexity of adaptations. These finding support the argument for allowing facilitators some flexibility and autonomy to adapt the delivery of prescribed content to participant needs and setting constraints.",
keywords = "Adolescents, Evidence-based program, Program implementation, Program implementation fidelity, Sexual and reproductive health programs",
author = "Jenita Parekh and Elizabeth Stuart and Blum, {Robert W} and Valerie Caldas and Brooke Whitfield and Jacky Jennings",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1007/s11121-019-01032-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "1074--1088",
journal = "Prevention Science",
issn = "1389-4986",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Addressing the Adherence-Adaptation Debate

T2 - Lessons from the Replication of an Evidence-Based Sexual Health Program in School Settings

AU - Parekh, Jenita

AU - Stuart, Elizabeth

AU - Blum, Robert W

AU - Caldas, Valerie

AU - Whitfield, Brooke

AU - Jennings, Jacky

PY - 2019/10/15

Y1 - 2019/10/15

N2 - Whether high adherence to programs is necessary to achieve program outcomes is an area of great debate. The objectives of this study were to determine the frequency, type, and rationale of adaptations made in the implementation of an evidence-based program and to determine program outcomes for intervention program participants, as compared to comparison participants, by the level of adaptations. A total of 1608 participants in 45 classrooms participated. Percent adaptations was calculated by classroom. Thematic qualitative analysis was used to categorize types and rationales for adaptations. Program outcomes by level of adaptations were determined using logistic regression analyses and mean differences. Propensity score matching methods were used to create comparability between adaptation subgroup participants and comparison participants. Adaptations ranged from 2 to 97% across classrooms, with mean adaptations of 63%. Thematic analysis revealed that the adaptations made were related to delivery of content, rather than to the content itself and in response to participant needs and setting constraints. Program outcomes did not appear to be reduced for the high-adaptation subgroup. Understanding both rationale (intent) and type of adaptation made is crucial to understanding the complexity of adaptations. These finding support the argument for allowing facilitators some flexibility and autonomy to adapt the delivery of prescribed content to participant needs and setting constraints.

AB - Whether high adherence to programs is necessary to achieve program outcomes is an area of great debate. The objectives of this study were to determine the frequency, type, and rationale of adaptations made in the implementation of an evidence-based program and to determine program outcomes for intervention program participants, as compared to comparison participants, by the level of adaptations. A total of 1608 participants in 45 classrooms participated. Percent adaptations was calculated by classroom. Thematic qualitative analysis was used to categorize types and rationales for adaptations. Program outcomes by level of adaptations were determined using logistic regression analyses and mean differences. Propensity score matching methods were used to create comparability between adaptation subgroup participants and comparison participants. Adaptations ranged from 2 to 97% across classrooms, with mean adaptations of 63%. Thematic analysis revealed that the adaptations made were related to delivery of content, rather than to the content itself and in response to participant needs and setting constraints. Program outcomes did not appear to be reduced for the high-adaptation subgroup. Understanding both rationale (intent) and type of adaptation made is crucial to understanding the complexity of adaptations. These finding support the argument for allowing facilitators some flexibility and autonomy to adapt the delivery of prescribed content to participant needs and setting constraints.

KW - Adolescents

KW - Evidence-based program

KW - Program implementation

KW - Program implementation fidelity

KW - Sexual and reproductive health programs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070317161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070317161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11121-019-01032-2

DO - 10.1007/s11121-019-01032-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 31396805

AN - SCOPUS:85070317161

VL - 20

SP - 1074

EP - 1088

JO - Prevention Science

JF - Prevention Science

SN - 1389-4986

IS - 7

ER -