Adamantinoma-like ewing family tumors of the head and neck: A pitfall in the differential diagnosis of basaloid and myoepithelial carcinomas

Justin A. Bishop, Rita Alaggio, Lei Zhang, Raja R. Seethala, Cristina R. Antonescu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Ewing sarcoma family tumors (EFTs) of the head and neck are rare and may be difficult to diagnose, as they display significant histologic overlap with other more common undifferentiated small blue round cell malignancies. Occasionally, EFTs may exhibit overt epithelial differentiation in the form of diffuse cytokeratin immunoexpression or squamous pearls, resembling the so-called adamantinoma-like EFTs and being challenging to distinguish from bona fide carcinomas. Furthermore, the presence of EWSR1 gene rearrangement correlated with strong keratin expression may suggest a myoepithelial carcinoma. Herein, we analyze a series of 7 adamantinoma-like EFTs of the head and neck, most of them being initially misdiagnosed as carcinomas because of their anatomic location and strong cytokeratin immunoexpression, and subsequently reclassified as EFT by molecular techniques. The tumors arose in the sinonasal tract (n=2), parotid gland (n=2), thyroid gland (n=2), and orbit (n=1), in patients ranging in age from 7 to 56 years (mean, 31y). Microscopically, they departed from the typical EFT morphology by growing as nests with peripheral nuclear palisading and prominent interlobular fibrosis, imparting a distinctly basaloid appearance. Moreover, 2 cases exhibited overt keratinization in the form of squamous pearls, and 1 sinonasal tumor demonstrated areas of intraepithelial growth. All cases were positive for CD99, pancytokeratin, and p40. A subset of cases showed synaptophysin, S100 protein, and/or p16 reactivity, further confounding the diagnosis. Fluorescence in situ hybridization assays showed EWSR1 and FLI1 rearrangements in all cases. Our results reinforce that a subset of head and neck EFTs may show strong cytokeratin expression or focal keratinization, and are therefore histologically indistinguishable from more common true epithelial neoplasms. Thus, CD99 should be included in the immunopanel of a round cell malignancy regardless of strong cytokeratin expression or anatomic location, and a strong and diffuse CD99 positivity should prompt molecular testing for the presence of EWSR1 gene rearrangements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1267-1274
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology
Volume39
Issue number9
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Adamantinoma
Ewing's Sarcoma
Differential Diagnosis
Neck
Head
Carcinoma
Keratins
Neoplasms
Gene Rearrangement
Synaptophysin
Glandular and Epithelial Neoplasms
S100 Proteins
Parotid Gland
Orbit
Diagnostic Errors
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization

Keywords

  • Adamantinoma-like Ewing sarcoma
  • Complex epithelial differentiation
  • Ewing sarcoma family tumor
  • EWSR1
  • FLI1
  • Primitive neuroectodermal tumor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Adamantinoma-like ewing family tumors of the head and neck : A pitfall in the differential diagnosis of basaloid and myoepithelial carcinomas. / Bishop, Justin A.; Alaggio, Rita; Zhang, Lei; Seethala, Raja R.; Antonescu, Cristina R.

In: American Journal of Surgical Pathology, Vol. 39, No. 9, 2015, p. 1267-1274.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bishop, Justin A. ; Alaggio, Rita ; Zhang, Lei ; Seethala, Raja R. ; Antonescu, Cristina R. / Adamantinoma-like ewing family tumors of the head and neck : A pitfall in the differential diagnosis of basaloid and myoepithelial carcinomas. In: American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2015 ; Vol. 39, No. 9. pp. 1267-1274.
@article{45c3f79a9ad9416cb3f477bc94aa0b6c,
title = "Adamantinoma-like ewing family tumors of the head and neck: A pitfall in the differential diagnosis of basaloid and myoepithelial carcinomas",
abstract = "Ewing sarcoma family tumors (EFTs) of the head and neck are rare and may be difficult to diagnose, as they display significant histologic overlap with other more common undifferentiated small blue round cell malignancies. Occasionally, EFTs may exhibit overt epithelial differentiation in the form of diffuse cytokeratin immunoexpression or squamous pearls, resembling the so-called adamantinoma-like EFTs and being challenging to distinguish from bona fide carcinomas. Furthermore, the presence of EWSR1 gene rearrangement correlated with strong keratin expression may suggest a myoepithelial carcinoma. Herein, we analyze a series of 7 adamantinoma-like EFTs of the head and neck, most of them being initially misdiagnosed as carcinomas because of their anatomic location and strong cytokeratin immunoexpression, and subsequently reclassified as EFT by molecular techniques. The tumors arose in the sinonasal tract (n=2), parotid gland (n=2), thyroid gland (n=2), and orbit (n=1), in patients ranging in age from 7 to 56 years (mean, 31y). Microscopically, they departed from the typical EFT morphology by growing as nests with peripheral nuclear palisading and prominent interlobular fibrosis, imparting a distinctly basaloid appearance. Moreover, 2 cases exhibited overt keratinization in the form of squamous pearls, and 1 sinonasal tumor demonstrated areas of intraepithelial growth. All cases were positive for CD99, pancytokeratin, and p40. A subset of cases showed synaptophysin, S100 protein, and/or p16 reactivity, further confounding the diagnosis. Fluorescence in situ hybridization assays showed EWSR1 and FLI1 rearrangements in all cases. Our results reinforce that a subset of head and neck EFTs may show strong cytokeratin expression or focal keratinization, and are therefore histologically indistinguishable from more common true epithelial neoplasms. Thus, CD99 should be included in the immunopanel of a round cell malignancy regardless of strong cytokeratin expression or anatomic location, and a strong and diffuse CD99 positivity should prompt molecular testing for the presence of EWSR1 gene rearrangements.",
keywords = "Adamantinoma-like Ewing sarcoma, Complex epithelial differentiation, Ewing sarcoma family tumor, EWSR1, FLI1, Primitive neuroectodermal tumor",
author = "Bishop, {Justin A.} and Rita Alaggio and Lei Zhang and Seethala, {Raja R.} and Antonescu, {Cristina R.}",
year = "2015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "1267--1274",
journal = "American Journal of Surgical Pathology",
issn = "0147-5185",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adamantinoma-like ewing family tumors of the head and neck

T2 - A pitfall in the differential diagnosis of basaloid and myoepithelial carcinomas

AU - Bishop, Justin A.

AU - Alaggio, Rita

AU - Zhang, Lei

AU - Seethala, Raja R.

AU - Antonescu, Cristina R.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Ewing sarcoma family tumors (EFTs) of the head and neck are rare and may be difficult to diagnose, as they display significant histologic overlap with other more common undifferentiated small blue round cell malignancies. Occasionally, EFTs may exhibit overt epithelial differentiation in the form of diffuse cytokeratin immunoexpression or squamous pearls, resembling the so-called adamantinoma-like EFTs and being challenging to distinguish from bona fide carcinomas. Furthermore, the presence of EWSR1 gene rearrangement correlated with strong keratin expression may suggest a myoepithelial carcinoma. Herein, we analyze a series of 7 adamantinoma-like EFTs of the head and neck, most of them being initially misdiagnosed as carcinomas because of their anatomic location and strong cytokeratin immunoexpression, and subsequently reclassified as EFT by molecular techniques. The tumors arose in the sinonasal tract (n=2), parotid gland (n=2), thyroid gland (n=2), and orbit (n=1), in patients ranging in age from 7 to 56 years (mean, 31y). Microscopically, they departed from the typical EFT morphology by growing as nests with peripheral nuclear palisading and prominent interlobular fibrosis, imparting a distinctly basaloid appearance. Moreover, 2 cases exhibited overt keratinization in the form of squamous pearls, and 1 sinonasal tumor demonstrated areas of intraepithelial growth. All cases were positive for CD99, pancytokeratin, and p40. A subset of cases showed synaptophysin, S100 protein, and/or p16 reactivity, further confounding the diagnosis. Fluorescence in situ hybridization assays showed EWSR1 and FLI1 rearrangements in all cases. Our results reinforce that a subset of head and neck EFTs may show strong cytokeratin expression or focal keratinization, and are therefore histologically indistinguishable from more common true epithelial neoplasms. Thus, CD99 should be included in the immunopanel of a round cell malignancy regardless of strong cytokeratin expression or anatomic location, and a strong and diffuse CD99 positivity should prompt molecular testing for the presence of EWSR1 gene rearrangements.

AB - Ewing sarcoma family tumors (EFTs) of the head and neck are rare and may be difficult to diagnose, as they display significant histologic overlap with other more common undifferentiated small blue round cell malignancies. Occasionally, EFTs may exhibit overt epithelial differentiation in the form of diffuse cytokeratin immunoexpression or squamous pearls, resembling the so-called adamantinoma-like EFTs and being challenging to distinguish from bona fide carcinomas. Furthermore, the presence of EWSR1 gene rearrangement correlated with strong keratin expression may suggest a myoepithelial carcinoma. Herein, we analyze a series of 7 adamantinoma-like EFTs of the head and neck, most of them being initially misdiagnosed as carcinomas because of their anatomic location and strong cytokeratin immunoexpression, and subsequently reclassified as EFT by molecular techniques. The tumors arose in the sinonasal tract (n=2), parotid gland (n=2), thyroid gland (n=2), and orbit (n=1), in patients ranging in age from 7 to 56 years (mean, 31y). Microscopically, they departed from the typical EFT morphology by growing as nests with peripheral nuclear palisading and prominent interlobular fibrosis, imparting a distinctly basaloid appearance. Moreover, 2 cases exhibited overt keratinization in the form of squamous pearls, and 1 sinonasal tumor demonstrated areas of intraepithelial growth. All cases were positive for CD99, pancytokeratin, and p40. A subset of cases showed synaptophysin, S100 protein, and/or p16 reactivity, further confounding the diagnosis. Fluorescence in situ hybridization assays showed EWSR1 and FLI1 rearrangements in all cases. Our results reinforce that a subset of head and neck EFTs may show strong cytokeratin expression or focal keratinization, and are therefore histologically indistinguishable from more common true epithelial neoplasms. Thus, CD99 should be included in the immunopanel of a round cell malignancy regardless of strong cytokeratin expression or anatomic location, and a strong and diffuse CD99 positivity should prompt molecular testing for the presence of EWSR1 gene rearrangements.

KW - Adamantinoma-like Ewing sarcoma

KW - Complex epithelial differentiation

KW - Ewing sarcoma family tumor

KW - EWSR1

KW - FLI1

KW - Primitive neuroectodermal tumor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942780869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942780869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 26034869

AN - SCOPUS:84942780869

VL - 39

SP - 1267

EP - 1274

JO - American Journal of Surgical Pathology

JF - American Journal of Surgical Pathology

SN - 0147-5185

IS - 9

ER -