Acute endophthalmitis following cataract surgery

A systematic review of the literature

Mehran Taban, Ashley Behrens, Robert L. Newcomb, Matthew Y. Nobe, Golnaz Saedi, Paula M. Sweet, Peter J McDonnell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the reported incidence of acute endophthalmitis following cataract extraction over time and to explore possible contributing factors, such as type of cataract incision. Methods: A systematic review of English-language articles was conducted by performing a broad search of PubMed from 1963 through March 2003 using such terms as cataract extraction, endophthalmitis, and postoperative complication. Additional studies were identified from bibliographies of relevant articles and published proceedings. Surgical approach was recorded, when available. Pooled incidence rates and relative risks of developing endophthalmitis using different incision techniques were assessed. Results: From 4916 unique, potentially relevant citations, 215 studies that addressed endophthalmitis and met the selection criteria were analyzed. A total of 3 140 650 cataract extractions were pooled resulting in an overall rate of 0.128% of postcataract endophthalmitis. However, the incidence of acute endophthalmitis changed over time, with a significant increase since 2000 compared with previous decades (relative risk, 2.44 [95% confidence interval, 2.27-2.61]). The rate of endophthalmitis was 0.265% in the 2000-2003 period, 0.087% in the 1990s, 0.158% in the 1980s, and 0.327% during the 1970s. Furthermore, an upward trend in rates after 1992 was noted, compared with 1991 and prior. Incision type appeared to significantly influence risk, as endophthalmitis following clear corneal cataract extraction during the 1992-2003 period was 0.189% compared with 0.074% (relative risk, 2.55 [95% confidence interval, 1.75-3.71]) for scierai incision and 0.062% (relative risk, 3.06 [95% confidence interval, 2.48-3.76]) for limbal incision. Conclusions: This systematic review indicates that the incidence of endophthalmitis associated with cataract extraction has increased over the last decade. This upward trend in endophthalmitis frequency coincides temporally with the development of sutureless clear corneal incisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)613-620
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Ophthalmology
Volume123
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2005

Fingerprint

Endophthalmitis
Cataract
Cataract Extraction
Incidence
Confidence Intervals
Bibliography
PubMed
Patient Selection
Language

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Acute endophthalmitis following cataract surgery : A systematic review of the literature. / Taban, Mehran; Behrens, Ashley; Newcomb, Robert L.; Nobe, Matthew Y.; Saedi, Golnaz; Sweet, Paula M.; McDonnell, Peter J.

In: Archives of Ophthalmology, Vol. 123, No. 5, 05.2005, p. 613-620.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Taban, Mehran ; Behrens, Ashley ; Newcomb, Robert L. ; Nobe, Matthew Y. ; Saedi, Golnaz ; Sweet, Paula M. ; McDonnell, Peter J. / Acute endophthalmitis following cataract surgery : A systematic review of the literature. In: Archives of Ophthalmology. 2005 ; Vol. 123, No. 5. pp. 613-620.
@article{dba6044aad9e4dd4919b2efab1ce3f36,
title = "Acute endophthalmitis following cataract surgery: A systematic review of the literature",
abstract = "Objectives: To determine the reported incidence of acute endophthalmitis following cataract extraction over time and to explore possible contributing factors, such as type of cataract incision. Methods: A systematic review of English-language articles was conducted by performing a broad search of PubMed from 1963 through March 2003 using such terms as cataract extraction, endophthalmitis, and postoperative complication. Additional studies were identified from bibliographies of relevant articles and published proceedings. Surgical approach was recorded, when available. Pooled incidence rates and relative risks of developing endophthalmitis using different incision techniques were assessed. Results: From 4916 unique, potentially relevant citations, 215 studies that addressed endophthalmitis and met the selection criteria were analyzed. A total of 3 140 650 cataract extractions were pooled resulting in an overall rate of 0.128{\%} of postcataract endophthalmitis. However, the incidence of acute endophthalmitis changed over time, with a significant increase since 2000 compared with previous decades (relative risk, 2.44 [95{\%} confidence interval, 2.27-2.61]). The rate of endophthalmitis was 0.265{\%} in the 2000-2003 period, 0.087{\%} in the 1990s, 0.158{\%} in the 1980s, and 0.327{\%} during the 1970s. Furthermore, an upward trend in rates after 1992 was noted, compared with 1991 and prior. Incision type appeared to significantly influence risk, as endophthalmitis following clear corneal cataract extraction during the 1992-2003 period was 0.189{\%} compared with 0.074{\%} (relative risk, 2.55 [95{\%} confidence interval, 1.75-3.71]) for scierai incision and 0.062{\%} (relative risk, 3.06 [95{\%} confidence interval, 2.48-3.76]) for limbal incision. Conclusions: This systematic review indicates that the incidence of endophthalmitis associated with cataract extraction has increased over the last decade. This upward trend in endophthalmitis frequency coincides temporally with the development of sutureless clear corneal incisions.",
author = "Mehran Taban and Ashley Behrens and Newcomb, {Robert L.} and Nobe, {Matthew Y.} and Golnaz Saedi and Sweet, {Paula M.} and McDonnell, {Peter J}",
year = "2005",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1001/archopht.123.5.613",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "123",
pages = "613--620",
journal = "JAMA Ophthalmology",
issn = "2168-6165",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acute endophthalmitis following cataract surgery

T2 - A systematic review of the literature

AU - Taban, Mehran

AU - Behrens, Ashley

AU - Newcomb, Robert L.

AU - Nobe, Matthew Y.

AU - Saedi, Golnaz

AU - Sweet, Paula M.

AU - McDonnell, Peter J

PY - 2005/5

Y1 - 2005/5

N2 - Objectives: To determine the reported incidence of acute endophthalmitis following cataract extraction over time and to explore possible contributing factors, such as type of cataract incision. Methods: A systematic review of English-language articles was conducted by performing a broad search of PubMed from 1963 through March 2003 using such terms as cataract extraction, endophthalmitis, and postoperative complication. Additional studies were identified from bibliographies of relevant articles and published proceedings. Surgical approach was recorded, when available. Pooled incidence rates and relative risks of developing endophthalmitis using different incision techniques were assessed. Results: From 4916 unique, potentially relevant citations, 215 studies that addressed endophthalmitis and met the selection criteria were analyzed. A total of 3 140 650 cataract extractions were pooled resulting in an overall rate of 0.128% of postcataract endophthalmitis. However, the incidence of acute endophthalmitis changed over time, with a significant increase since 2000 compared with previous decades (relative risk, 2.44 [95% confidence interval, 2.27-2.61]). The rate of endophthalmitis was 0.265% in the 2000-2003 period, 0.087% in the 1990s, 0.158% in the 1980s, and 0.327% during the 1970s. Furthermore, an upward trend in rates after 1992 was noted, compared with 1991 and prior. Incision type appeared to significantly influence risk, as endophthalmitis following clear corneal cataract extraction during the 1992-2003 period was 0.189% compared with 0.074% (relative risk, 2.55 [95% confidence interval, 1.75-3.71]) for scierai incision and 0.062% (relative risk, 3.06 [95% confidence interval, 2.48-3.76]) for limbal incision. Conclusions: This systematic review indicates that the incidence of endophthalmitis associated with cataract extraction has increased over the last decade. This upward trend in endophthalmitis frequency coincides temporally with the development of sutureless clear corneal incisions.

AB - Objectives: To determine the reported incidence of acute endophthalmitis following cataract extraction over time and to explore possible contributing factors, such as type of cataract incision. Methods: A systematic review of English-language articles was conducted by performing a broad search of PubMed from 1963 through March 2003 using such terms as cataract extraction, endophthalmitis, and postoperative complication. Additional studies were identified from bibliographies of relevant articles and published proceedings. Surgical approach was recorded, when available. Pooled incidence rates and relative risks of developing endophthalmitis using different incision techniques were assessed. Results: From 4916 unique, potentially relevant citations, 215 studies that addressed endophthalmitis and met the selection criteria were analyzed. A total of 3 140 650 cataract extractions were pooled resulting in an overall rate of 0.128% of postcataract endophthalmitis. However, the incidence of acute endophthalmitis changed over time, with a significant increase since 2000 compared with previous decades (relative risk, 2.44 [95% confidence interval, 2.27-2.61]). The rate of endophthalmitis was 0.265% in the 2000-2003 period, 0.087% in the 1990s, 0.158% in the 1980s, and 0.327% during the 1970s. Furthermore, an upward trend in rates after 1992 was noted, compared with 1991 and prior. Incision type appeared to significantly influence risk, as endophthalmitis following clear corneal cataract extraction during the 1992-2003 period was 0.189% compared with 0.074% (relative risk, 2.55 [95% confidence interval, 1.75-3.71]) for scierai incision and 0.062% (relative risk, 3.06 [95% confidence interval, 2.48-3.76]) for limbal incision. Conclusions: This systematic review indicates that the incidence of endophthalmitis associated with cataract extraction has increased over the last decade. This upward trend in endophthalmitis frequency coincides temporally with the development of sutureless clear corneal incisions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18444400831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18444400831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archopht.123.5.613

DO - 10.1001/archopht.123.5.613

M3 - Article

VL - 123

SP - 613

EP - 620

JO - JAMA Ophthalmology

JF - JAMA Ophthalmology

SN - 2168-6165

IS - 5

ER -