Acute bacterial suppurative thyroiditis: A clinical review and expert opinion

John E. Paes, Kenneth D. Burman, James Cohen, Jayne Franklyn, Christopher R. McHenry, Shmuel Shoham, Richard T. Kloos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

85 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Acute suppurative thyroiditis (AST) resulting from a bacterial infection is an infrequent but potentially life-threatening endocrine emergency. Traditional management of this disease has been surgery in conjunction with targeted antibiotic therapy. Recent nonrandomized reports of small series have demonstrated good outcomes using less invasive approaches. No randomized clinical trials have been performed. Here, we provide a review of the literature and an approach to this problem based on expert opinion. Methods: The literature was reviewed utilizing PubMed, and a representative case of AST was presented to a panel of experts. Endocrinology, surgery, and infectious disease experts responded to a series of questions regarding diagnosis, management, prognosis, and harm. Results: Combining a broad spectrum of clinical expertise and the published literature, the authors suggest a clinical algorithm as a guide to management, addressing both diagnosis and acute and long-term management. Conclusions: Published studies indicate a trend toward less invasive management during active inflammation and infection and regarding definite therapy. Remaining questions are presented to foster an evidence-based approach to this disease. Ideally, future randomized, controlled trials will provide data to improve the therapy and outcome of AST.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)247-255
Number of pages9
JournalThyroid
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Endocrinology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Acute bacterial suppurative thyroiditis: A clinical review and expert opinion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this