Active compared with expectant delivery management in women with gestational diabetes: A systematic review

Catherine Takacs Witkop, Donna M Neale, Lisa Wilson, Eric B Bass, Wanda K. Nicholson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review to estimate benefits and harms of the choice of timing of induction or elective cesarean delivery based on estimated fetal weight or gestational age in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). DATA SOURCES: An electronic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to January 2007. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Two investigators independently reviewed titles and abstracts, assessed article quality, and abstracted data. Maternal outcomes included cesarean delivery and operative vaginal delivery. Neonatal outcomes included birth weight, macrosomia, large for gestational age, shoulder dystocia, birth trauma, neonatal intensive care admissions, and perinatal mortality. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Five studies met our inclusion criteria: one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and four observational studies. The RCT (n=200) compared the effect of labor induction at term with expectant management. The proportion of newborns with birth weight greater than the 90th percentile was significantly greater in the expectant-management group (23% compared with 10% with active induction, P=.02); there were no significant differences in rates of cesarean delivery, shoulder dystocia, neonatal hypoglycemia, or perinatal deaths. The four observational studies suggest a potential reduction in macrosomia and shoulder dystocia with labor induction and cesarean delivery for estimated fetal weight indications, but there was insufficient evidence to assess other clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Active rather than expectant management of labor at term for women with GDM may reduce rates of macrosomia and related complications. Further RCTs and observational studies with a broader range of outcomes are needed for sufficient evidence to inform clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)206-217
Number of pages12
JournalObstetrics and Gynecology
Volume113
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dystocia
Gestational Diabetes
Induced Labor
Gestational Age
Observational Studies
Fetal Weight
Birth Weight
Randomized Controlled Trials
Neonatal Intensive Care
Perinatal Mortality
Hypoglycemia
MEDLINE
Nursing
Mothers
Research Personnel
Parturition
Newborn Infant
Health
Wounds and Injuries
Perinatal Death

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Active compared with expectant delivery management in women with gestational diabetes : A systematic review. / Witkop, Catherine Takacs; Neale, Donna M; Wilson, Lisa; Bass, Eric B; Nicholson, Wanda K.

In: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 113, No. 1, 01.2009, p. 206-217.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{898e22a1ce544cc79276cd83a0372ba6,
title = "Active compared with expectant delivery management in women with gestational diabetes: A systematic review",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review to estimate benefits and harms of the choice of timing of induction or elective cesarean delivery based on estimated fetal weight or gestational age in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). DATA SOURCES: An electronic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to January 2007. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Two investigators independently reviewed titles and abstracts, assessed article quality, and abstracted data. Maternal outcomes included cesarean delivery and operative vaginal delivery. Neonatal outcomes included birth weight, macrosomia, large for gestational age, shoulder dystocia, birth trauma, neonatal intensive care admissions, and perinatal mortality. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Five studies met our inclusion criteria: one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and four observational studies. The RCT (n=200) compared the effect of labor induction at term with expectant management. The proportion of newborns with birth weight greater than the 90th percentile was significantly greater in the expectant-management group (23{\%} compared with 10{\%} with active induction, P=.02); there were no significant differences in rates of cesarean delivery, shoulder dystocia, neonatal hypoglycemia, or perinatal deaths. The four observational studies suggest a potential reduction in macrosomia and shoulder dystocia with labor induction and cesarean delivery for estimated fetal weight indications, but there was insufficient evidence to assess other clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Active rather than expectant management of labor at term for women with GDM may reduce rates of macrosomia and related complications. Further RCTs and observational studies with a broader range of outcomes are needed for sufficient evidence to inform clinical practice.",
author = "Witkop, {Catherine Takacs} and Neale, {Donna M} and Lisa Wilson and Bass, {Eric B} and Nicholson, {Wanda K.}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818db36f",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "113",
pages = "206--217",
journal = "Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0029-7844",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Active compared with expectant delivery management in women with gestational diabetes

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Witkop, Catherine Takacs

AU - Neale, Donna M

AU - Wilson, Lisa

AU - Bass, Eric B

AU - Nicholson, Wanda K.

PY - 2009/1

Y1 - 2009/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review to estimate benefits and harms of the choice of timing of induction or elective cesarean delivery based on estimated fetal weight or gestational age in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). DATA SOURCES: An electronic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to January 2007. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Two investigators independently reviewed titles and abstracts, assessed article quality, and abstracted data. Maternal outcomes included cesarean delivery and operative vaginal delivery. Neonatal outcomes included birth weight, macrosomia, large for gestational age, shoulder dystocia, birth trauma, neonatal intensive care admissions, and perinatal mortality. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Five studies met our inclusion criteria: one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and four observational studies. The RCT (n=200) compared the effect of labor induction at term with expectant management. The proportion of newborns with birth weight greater than the 90th percentile was significantly greater in the expectant-management group (23% compared with 10% with active induction, P=.02); there were no significant differences in rates of cesarean delivery, shoulder dystocia, neonatal hypoglycemia, or perinatal deaths. The four observational studies suggest a potential reduction in macrosomia and shoulder dystocia with labor induction and cesarean delivery for estimated fetal weight indications, but there was insufficient evidence to assess other clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Active rather than expectant management of labor at term for women with GDM may reduce rates of macrosomia and related complications. Further RCTs and observational studies with a broader range of outcomes are needed for sufficient evidence to inform clinical practice.

AB - OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review to estimate benefits and harms of the choice of timing of induction or elective cesarean delivery based on estimated fetal weight or gestational age in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). DATA SOURCES: An electronic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to January 2007. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Two investigators independently reviewed titles and abstracts, assessed article quality, and abstracted data. Maternal outcomes included cesarean delivery and operative vaginal delivery. Neonatal outcomes included birth weight, macrosomia, large for gestational age, shoulder dystocia, birth trauma, neonatal intensive care admissions, and perinatal mortality. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Five studies met our inclusion criteria: one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and four observational studies. The RCT (n=200) compared the effect of labor induction at term with expectant management. The proportion of newborns with birth weight greater than the 90th percentile was significantly greater in the expectant-management group (23% compared with 10% with active induction, P=.02); there were no significant differences in rates of cesarean delivery, shoulder dystocia, neonatal hypoglycemia, or perinatal deaths. The four observational studies suggest a potential reduction in macrosomia and shoulder dystocia with labor induction and cesarean delivery for estimated fetal weight indications, but there was insufficient evidence to assess other clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Active rather than expectant management of labor at term for women with GDM may reduce rates of macrosomia and related complications. Further RCTs and observational studies with a broader range of outcomes are needed for sufficient evidence to inform clinical practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60749109339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=60749109339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818db36f

DO - 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818db36f

M3 - Article

C2 - 19104376

AN - SCOPUS:60749109339

VL - 113

SP - 206

EP - 217

JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0029-7844

IS - 1

ER -