ACR DIR: A user's guide for cardiothoracic radiologists: Part 2: How to interpret your DIR report

Venkatesh A. Murugan, Mythreyi B. Chatfield, Madan Rehani, Mannudeep K. Kalra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the initial installment of this 3-part article, we reviewed the role and logistics of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Dose Index Registry (DIR). In this second installment, we review the essential components of ACR DIR and describe how users can interpret their biannual dose reports by benchmarking them against regional or national levels. Understanding these reports can help participating institutions to identify specific protocols or practices that may benefit from changes in order to minimize patient dose while maintaining diagnostic quality examinations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)W69-W72
JournalJournal of Thoracic Imaging
Volume30
Issue number6
StatePublished - Oct 20 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Radiology
Registries
Benchmarking
Radiologists

Keywords

  • Dose Index Registry
  • Interpreting report
  • Scenarios

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Murugan, V. A., Chatfield, M. B., Rehani, M., & Kalra, M. K. (2015). ACR DIR: A user's guide for cardiothoracic radiologists: Part 2: How to interpret your DIR report. Journal of Thoracic Imaging, 30(6), W69-W72.

ACR DIR : A user's guide for cardiothoracic radiologists: Part 2: How to interpret your DIR report. / Murugan, Venkatesh A.; Chatfield, Mythreyi B.; Rehani, Madan; Kalra, Mannudeep K.

In: Journal of Thoracic Imaging, Vol. 30, No. 6, 20.10.2015, p. W69-W72.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Murugan, VA, Chatfield, MB, Rehani, M & Kalra, MK 2015, 'ACR DIR: A user's guide for cardiothoracic radiologists: Part 2: How to interpret your DIR report', Journal of Thoracic Imaging, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. W69-W72.
Murugan, Venkatesh A. ; Chatfield, Mythreyi B. ; Rehani, Madan ; Kalra, Mannudeep K. / ACR DIR : A user's guide for cardiothoracic radiologists: Part 2: How to interpret your DIR report. In: Journal of Thoracic Imaging. 2015 ; Vol. 30, No. 6. pp. W69-W72.
@article{9443b52a9e4f40adb65f7a362c960a79,
title = "ACR DIR: A user's guide for cardiothoracic radiologists: Part 2: How to interpret your DIR report",
abstract = "In the initial installment of this 3-part article, we reviewed the role and logistics of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Dose Index Registry (DIR). In this second installment, we review the essential components of ACR DIR and describe how users can interpret their biannual dose reports by benchmarking them against regional or national levels. Understanding these reports can help participating institutions to identify specific protocols or practices that may benefit from changes in order to minimize patient dose while maintaining diagnostic quality examinations.",
keywords = "Dose Index Registry, Interpreting report, Scenarios",
author = "Murugan, {Venkatesh A.} and Chatfield, {Mythreyi B.} and Madan Rehani and Kalra, {Mannudeep K.}",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "20",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "W69--W72",
journal = "Journal of Thoracic Imaging",
issn = "0883-5993",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ACR DIR

T2 - A user's guide for cardiothoracic radiologists: Part 2: How to interpret your DIR report

AU - Murugan, Venkatesh A.

AU - Chatfield, Mythreyi B.

AU - Rehani, Madan

AU - Kalra, Mannudeep K.

PY - 2015/10/20

Y1 - 2015/10/20

N2 - In the initial installment of this 3-part article, we reviewed the role and logistics of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Dose Index Registry (DIR). In this second installment, we review the essential components of ACR DIR and describe how users can interpret their biannual dose reports by benchmarking them against regional or national levels. Understanding these reports can help participating institutions to identify specific protocols or practices that may benefit from changes in order to minimize patient dose while maintaining diagnostic quality examinations.

AB - In the initial installment of this 3-part article, we reviewed the role and logistics of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Dose Index Registry (DIR). In this second installment, we review the essential components of ACR DIR and describe how users can interpret their biannual dose reports by benchmarking them against regional or national levels. Understanding these reports can help participating institutions to identify specific protocols or practices that may benefit from changes in order to minimize patient dose while maintaining diagnostic quality examinations.

KW - Dose Index Registry

KW - Interpreting report

KW - Scenarios

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944876731&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944876731&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 25856412

AN - SCOPUS:84944876731

VL - 30

SP - W69-W72

JO - Journal of Thoracic Imaging

JF - Journal of Thoracic Imaging

SN - 0883-5993

IS - 6

ER -