Acquisition and transfer of control by an ambiguous cue

Peter C Holland, Christine E. Reeve

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In three experiments, the specificity of action of occasion setters was examined, using a discretetrial leverpress procedure. Rats' acquisition of an XA+, A-, XB-, B+ discrimination, in which a single feature cue (X) signaled the reinforcement of responding in the presence of one target cue (A) and the nonreinforcement of responding during another target (B), was no more difficult than acquisition of XA+, A-, X-, B+ or X+, A-, XB-, B+ discriminations, in which X signaled only one target-response-reinforcement contingency. In transfer tests, X did not modulate responding controlled by other cues that were untrained or consistently reinforced, either when the elements of the compounds were presented serially or when they were presented simultaneously in training and testing. However, after serial, but not after simultaneous, compound training, X facilitated responding controlled by a cue that was trained and then extinguished. Implications for the nature of occasion setting and configurai learning are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)113-124
Number of pages12
JournalAnimal Learning & Behavior
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cues
learning
testing
rats
Learning
Transfer (Psychology)
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Discrimination (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

Acquisition and transfer of control by an ambiguous cue. / Holland, Peter C; Reeve, Christine E.

In: Animal Learning & Behavior, Vol. 19, No. 2, 06.1991, p. 113-124.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Holland, Peter C ; Reeve, Christine E. / Acquisition and transfer of control by an ambiguous cue. In: Animal Learning & Behavior. 1991 ; Vol. 19, No. 2. pp. 113-124.
@article{4c44e19961a74e7b961ac7f73610c6ac,
title = "Acquisition and transfer of control by an ambiguous cue",
abstract = "In three experiments, the specificity of action of occasion setters was examined, using a discretetrial leverpress procedure. Rats' acquisition of an XA+, A-, XB-, B+ discrimination, in which a single feature cue (X) signaled the reinforcement of responding in the presence of one target cue (A) and the nonreinforcement of responding during another target (B), was no more difficult than acquisition of XA+, A-, X-, B+ or X+, A-, XB-, B+ discriminations, in which X signaled only one target-response-reinforcement contingency. In transfer tests, X did not modulate responding controlled by other cues that were untrained or consistently reinforced, either when the elements of the compounds were presented serially or when they were presented simultaneously in training and testing. However, after serial, but not after simultaneous, compound training, X facilitated responding controlled by a cue that was trained and then extinguished. Implications for the nature of occasion setting and configurai learning are discussed.",
author = "Holland, {Peter C} and Reeve, {Christine E.}",
year = "1991",
month = "6",
doi = "10.3758/BF03197867",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "113--124",
journal = "Animal Learning and Behavior",
issn = "0090-4996",
publisher = "Psychonomic Society Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acquisition and transfer of control by an ambiguous cue

AU - Holland, Peter C

AU - Reeve, Christine E.

PY - 1991/6

Y1 - 1991/6

N2 - In three experiments, the specificity of action of occasion setters was examined, using a discretetrial leverpress procedure. Rats' acquisition of an XA+, A-, XB-, B+ discrimination, in which a single feature cue (X) signaled the reinforcement of responding in the presence of one target cue (A) and the nonreinforcement of responding during another target (B), was no more difficult than acquisition of XA+, A-, X-, B+ or X+, A-, XB-, B+ discriminations, in which X signaled only one target-response-reinforcement contingency. In transfer tests, X did not modulate responding controlled by other cues that were untrained or consistently reinforced, either when the elements of the compounds were presented serially or when they were presented simultaneously in training and testing. However, after serial, but not after simultaneous, compound training, X facilitated responding controlled by a cue that was trained and then extinguished. Implications for the nature of occasion setting and configurai learning are discussed.

AB - In three experiments, the specificity of action of occasion setters was examined, using a discretetrial leverpress procedure. Rats' acquisition of an XA+, A-, XB-, B+ discrimination, in which a single feature cue (X) signaled the reinforcement of responding in the presence of one target cue (A) and the nonreinforcement of responding during another target (B), was no more difficult than acquisition of XA+, A-, X-, B+ or X+, A-, XB-, B+ discriminations, in which X signaled only one target-response-reinforcement contingency. In transfer tests, X did not modulate responding controlled by other cues that were untrained or consistently reinforced, either when the elements of the compounds were presented serially or when they were presented simultaneously in training and testing. However, after serial, but not after simultaneous, compound training, X facilitated responding controlled by a cue that was trained and then extinguished. Implications for the nature of occasion setting and configurai learning are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025736069&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025736069&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03197867

DO - 10.3758/BF03197867

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 113

EP - 124

JO - Animal Learning and Behavior

JF - Animal Learning and Behavior

SN - 0090-4996

IS - 2

ER -