Accurate structure prediction of CDR H3 loops enabled by a novel structure-based C-terminal constraint

Brian D. Weitzner, Jeffrey J. Gray

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Abstract

Ab structure prediction has made great strides, but accurately modeling CDR H3 loops remains elusive. Unlike the other five CDR loops, CDR H3 does not adopt canonical conformations and must be modeled de novo. During Antibody Modeling Assessment II, we found that biasing simulations toward kinked conformations enables generating low-root mean square deviation models (Weitzner et al. 2014. Proteins 82: 1611-1623), and since then, we have presented new geometric parameters defining the kink conformation (Weitzner et al. 2015. Structure 23: 302-311). In this study, we use these parameters to develop a new biasing constraint. When applied to a benchmark set of high-quality CDR H3 loops, the average minimum root mean square deviation sampled is 0.93 Å, compared with 1.34 Å without the constraint. We then test the performance of the constrained de novo method for homology modeling and rigid-body docking and present the results for 1) the Antibody Modeling Assessment II targets, 2) the 2009 RosettaAntibody benchmark set, and 3) the high-quality set.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages505-515
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Immunology
Volume198
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Benchmarking
Antibodies
Proteins

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology

Cite this

Accurate structure prediction of CDR H3 loops enabled by a novel structure-based C-terminal constraint. / Weitzner, Brian D.; Gray, Jeffrey J.

In: Journal of Immunology, Vol. 198, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 505-515.

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

@article{5e9e1549faa64cc0ac6dfe9ad1d4f895,
title = "Accurate structure prediction of CDR H3 loops enabled by a novel structure-based C-terminal constraint",
abstract = "Ab structure prediction has made great strides, but accurately modeling CDR H3 loops remains elusive. Unlike the other five CDR loops, CDR H3 does not adopt canonical conformations and must be modeled de novo. During Antibody Modeling Assessment II, we found that biasing simulations toward kinked conformations enables generating low-root mean square deviation models (Weitzner et al. 2014. Proteins 82: 1611-1623), and since then, we have presented new geometric parameters defining the kink conformation (Weitzner et al. 2015. Structure 23: 302-311). In this study, we use these parameters to develop a new biasing constraint. When applied to a benchmark set of high-quality CDR H3 loops, the average minimum root mean square deviation sampled is 0.93 Å, compared with 1.34 Å without the constraint. We then test the performance of the constrained de novo method for homology modeling and rigid-body docking and present the results for 1) the Antibody Modeling Assessment II targets, 2) the 2009 RosettaAntibody benchmark set, and 3) the high-quality set.",
author = "Weitzner, {Brian D.} and Gray, {Jeffrey J.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
doi = "10.4049/jimmunol.1601137",
volume = "198",
pages = "505--515",
journal = "Journal of Immunology",
issn = "0022-1767",
publisher = "American Association of Immunologists",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accurate structure prediction of CDR H3 loops enabled by a novel structure-based C-terminal constraint

AU - Weitzner,Brian D.

AU - Gray,Jeffrey J.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Ab structure prediction has made great strides, but accurately modeling CDR H3 loops remains elusive. Unlike the other five CDR loops, CDR H3 does not adopt canonical conformations and must be modeled de novo. During Antibody Modeling Assessment II, we found that biasing simulations toward kinked conformations enables generating low-root mean square deviation models (Weitzner et al. 2014. Proteins 82: 1611-1623), and since then, we have presented new geometric parameters defining the kink conformation (Weitzner et al. 2015. Structure 23: 302-311). In this study, we use these parameters to develop a new biasing constraint. When applied to a benchmark set of high-quality CDR H3 loops, the average minimum root mean square deviation sampled is 0.93 Å, compared with 1.34 Å without the constraint. We then test the performance of the constrained de novo method for homology modeling and rigid-body docking and present the results for 1) the Antibody Modeling Assessment II targets, 2) the 2009 RosettaAntibody benchmark set, and 3) the high-quality set.

AB - Ab structure prediction has made great strides, but accurately modeling CDR H3 loops remains elusive. Unlike the other five CDR loops, CDR H3 does not adopt canonical conformations and must be modeled de novo. During Antibody Modeling Assessment II, we found that biasing simulations toward kinked conformations enables generating low-root mean square deviation models (Weitzner et al. 2014. Proteins 82: 1611-1623), and since then, we have presented new geometric parameters defining the kink conformation (Weitzner et al. 2015. Structure 23: 302-311). In this study, we use these parameters to develop a new biasing constraint. When applied to a benchmark set of high-quality CDR H3 loops, the average minimum root mean square deviation sampled is 0.93 Å, compared with 1.34 Å without the constraint. We then test the performance of the constrained de novo method for homology modeling and rigid-body docking and present the results for 1) the Antibody Modeling Assessment II targets, 2) the 2009 RosettaAntibody benchmark set, and 3) the high-quality set.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006982403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006982403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4049/jimmunol.1601137

DO - 10.4049/jimmunol.1601137

M3 - Article

VL - 198

SP - 505

EP - 515

JO - Journal of Immunology

T2 - Journal of Immunology

JF - Journal of Immunology

SN - 0022-1767

IS - 1

ER -