Accurate ALSFRS-R scores can be generated from retrospective review of clinic notes

Noah Lechtzin, Nicholas J Maragakis, Richard Kimball, Anne Busse, Virginia Hoffman, Lora Clawson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Retrospective studies are important in ALS but require markers of disease severity to enable risk adjustment and to allow fair comparisons between patient groups. The ALSFRS-R could be used as such a measure. This study aimed to determine if accurate ALSFRS-R scores could be generated by reviewing clinic notes. Five investigators reviewed 100 de-identified clinic notes to generate estimated ALSFRS-R scores. These scores were compared to ALSFRS-R scores completed by patients within three months of the clinic note. The retrospective ALSFRS-R scores did not differ significantly from the actual scores (mean retrospective score 38.7 ± 5 vs. actual score 38.4 ± 6, p = 0.5). The intra-class correlation coefficient between actual and retrospective scores confirmed reasonable agreement (rho = 0.53, p

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)244-247
Number of pages4
JournalAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Risk Adjustment
Retrospective Studies
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Disease severity
  • Epidemiology
  • Motor neuron disease
  • Retrospective studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology

Cite this

Accurate ALSFRS-R scores can be generated from retrospective review of clinic notes. / Lechtzin, Noah; Maragakis, Nicholas J; Kimball, Richard; Busse, Anne; Hoffman, Virginia; Clawson, Lora.

In: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2009, p. 244-247.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a0b89fb4ebef4bff874e89a2479c6775,
title = "Accurate ALSFRS-R scores can be generated from retrospective review of clinic notes",
abstract = "Retrospective studies are important in ALS but require markers of disease severity to enable risk adjustment and to allow fair comparisons between patient groups. The ALSFRS-R could be used as such a measure. This study aimed to determine if accurate ALSFRS-R scores could be generated by reviewing clinic notes. Five investigators reviewed 100 de-identified clinic notes to generate estimated ALSFRS-R scores. These scores were compared to ALSFRS-R scores completed by patients within three months of the clinic note. The retrospective ALSFRS-R scores did not differ significantly from the actual scores (mean retrospective score 38.7 ± 5 vs. actual score 38.4 ± 6, p = 0.5). The intra-class correlation coefficient between actual and retrospective scores confirmed reasonable agreement (rho = 0.53, p",
keywords = "Disease severity, Epidemiology, Motor neuron disease, Retrospective studies",
author = "Noah Lechtzin and Maragakis, {Nicholas J} and Richard Kimball and Anne Busse and Virginia Hoffman and Lora Clawson",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1080/17482960802502993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "244--247",
journal = "Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration",
issn = "2167-8421",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accurate ALSFRS-R scores can be generated from retrospective review of clinic notes

AU - Lechtzin, Noah

AU - Maragakis, Nicholas J

AU - Kimball, Richard

AU - Busse, Anne

AU - Hoffman, Virginia

AU - Clawson, Lora

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Retrospective studies are important in ALS but require markers of disease severity to enable risk adjustment and to allow fair comparisons between patient groups. The ALSFRS-R could be used as such a measure. This study aimed to determine if accurate ALSFRS-R scores could be generated by reviewing clinic notes. Five investigators reviewed 100 de-identified clinic notes to generate estimated ALSFRS-R scores. These scores were compared to ALSFRS-R scores completed by patients within three months of the clinic note. The retrospective ALSFRS-R scores did not differ significantly from the actual scores (mean retrospective score 38.7 ± 5 vs. actual score 38.4 ± 6, p = 0.5). The intra-class correlation coefficient between actual and retrospective scores confirmed reasonable agreement (rho = 0.53, p

AB - Retrospective studies are important in ALS but require markers of disease severity to enable risk adjustment and to allow fair comparisons between patient groups. The ALSFRS-R could be used as such a measure. This study aimed to determine if accurate ALSFRS-R scores could be generated by reviewing clinic notes. Five investigators reviewed 100 de-identified clinic notes to generate estimated ALSFRS-R scores. These scores were compared to ALSFRS-R scores completed by patients within three months of the clinic note. The retrospective ALSFRS-R scores did not differ significantly from the actual scores (mean retrospective score 38.7 ± 5 vs. actual score 38.4 ± 6, p = 0.5). The intra-class correlation coefficient between actual and retrospective scores confirmed reasonable agreement (rho = 0.53, p

KW - Disease severity

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Motor neuron disease

KW - Retrospective studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70249091089&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70249091089&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17482960802502993

DO - 10.1080/17482960802502993

M3 - Article

C2 - 18985465

AN - SCOPUS:70249091089

VL - 10

SP - 244

EP - 247

JO - Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration

JF - Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration

SN - 2167-8421

IS - 4

ER -