Accuracy of intra-articular glenohumeral injections: The anterosuperior technique with arthroscopic documentation

Timothy S. Johnson, Addisu Mesfin, Kevin W. Farmer, Lawrence A. McGuigan, Ines G. Alamo, Lynne C Jones, David C. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Our objective was to assess the accuracy rate of needle placement with the anterosuperior technique of glenohumeral joint injection that uses familiar palpable superficial landmarks as a guide instead of diagnostic imaging. Methods: Between April 2007 and October 2007 at our institution, 42 patients met the study inclusion criteria of being aged 18 years or older and undergoing shoulder arthroscopy. For the injection (performed by 1 surgeon), anesthetized patients were placed in the beach-chair position with the arm in adduction and internal rotation. The surgeon was allowed to redirect the needle only once without withdrawing the needle from the entry site. After injection, arthroscopic confirmation of needle position in the joint and the presence of backflow from the posterior portal cannula were used to determine accuracy and the relation of the needle to adjacent anatomy. Results: Of the 42 injections, 38 needles were inserted accurately into the glenohumeral joint (91% accuracy rate), most through the rotator interval (21) or the long head of the biceps tendon (9). Four needles were placed inaccurately into the anterior synovium and subacromial space. Adhesive capsulitis was the diagnosis in 3 of those 4 shoulders but in only 5 of the 38 shoulders in the group with accurate placement (P <.05). Body mass index was not statistically different between the accurate and inaccurate injection groups (P > .05). Conclusions: Anterosuperior glenohumeral joint injection without image guidance provides an accuracy rate of 91%. The anterosuperior technique for glenohumeral injections yields an accuracy rate higher than that of the standard anterior techniques and comparable to that of posterior injection. Level of Evidence Level IV, diagnostic study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)745-749
Number of pages5
JournalArthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume27
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Intra-Articular Injections
Documentation
Needles
Injections
Shoulder Joint
Bursitis
Synovial Membrane
Arthroscopy
Diagnostic Imaging
Tendons
Anatomy
Arm
Joints

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Accuracy of intra-articular glenohumeral injections : The anterosuperior technique with arthroscopic documentation. / Johnson, Timothy S.; Mesfin, Addisu; Farmer, Kevin W.; McGuigan, Lawrence A.; Alamo, Ines G.; Jones, Lynne C; Johnson, David C.

In: Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol. 27, No. 6, 06.2011, p. 745-749.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Johnson, Timothy S. ; Mesfin, Addisu ; Farmer, Kevin W. ; McGuigan, Lawrence A. ; Alamo, Ines G. ; Jones, Lynne C ; Johnson, David C. / Accuracy of intra-articular glenohumeral injections : The anterosuperior technique with arthroscopic documentation. In: Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery. 2011 ; Vol. 27, No. 6. pp. 745-749.
@article{abd18f7a64824736bb3e1a1133006c15,
title = "Accuracy of intra-articular glenohumeral injections: The anterosuperior technique with arthroscopic documentation",
abstract = "Purpose: Our objective was to assess the accuracy rate of needle placement with the anterosuperior technique of glenohumeral joint injection that uses familiar palpable superficial landmarks as a guide instead of diagnostic imaging. Methods: Between April 2007 and October 2007 at our institution, 42 patients met the study inclusion criteria of being aged 18 years or older and undergoing shoulder arthroscopy. For the injection (performed by 1 surgeon), anesthetized patients were placed in the beach-chair position with the arm in adduction and internal rotation. The surgeon was allowed to redirect the needle only once without withdrawing the needle from the entry site. After injection, arthroscopic confirmation of needle position in the joint and the presence of backflow from the posterior portal cannula were used to determine accuracy and the relation of the needle to adjacent anatomy. Results: Of the 42 injections, 38 needles were inserted accurately into the glenohumeral joint (91{\%} accuracy rate), most through the rotator interval (21) or the long head of the biceps tendon (9). Four needles were placed inaccurately into the anterior synovium and subacromial space. Adhesive capsulitis was the diagnosis in 3 of those 4 shoulders but in only 5 of the 38 shoulders in the group with accurate placement (P <.05). Body mass index was not statistically different between the accurate and inaccurate injection groups (P > .05). Conclusions: Anterosuperior glenohumeral joint injection without image guidance provides an accuracy rate of 91{\%}. The anterosuperior technique for glenohumeral injections yields an accuracy rate higher than that of the standard anterior techniques and comparable to that of posterior injection. Level of Evidence Level IV, diagnostic study.",
author = "Johnson, {Timothy S.} and Addisu Mesfin and Farmer, {Kevin W.} and McGuigan, {Lawrence A.} and Alamo, {Ines G.} and Jones, {Lynne C} and Johnson, {David C.}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.arthro.2011.02.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "745--749",
journal = "Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery",
issn = "0749-8063",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of intra-articular glenohumeral injections

T2 - The anterosuperior technique with arthroscopic documentation

AU - Johnson, Timothy S.

AU - Mesfin, Addisu

AU - Farmer, Kevin W.

AU - McGuigan, Lawrence A.

AU - Alamo, Ines G.

AU - Jones, Lynne C

AU - Johnson, David C.

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - Purpose: Our objective was to assess the accuracy rate of needle placement with the anterosuperior technique of glenohumeral joint injection that uses familiar palpable superficial landmarks as a guide instead of diagnostic imaging. Methods: Between April 2007 and October 2007 at our institution, 42 patients met the study inclusion criteria of being aged 18 years or older and undergoing shoulder arthroscopy. For the injection (performed by 1 surgeon), anesthetized patients were placed in the beach-chair position with the arm in adduction and internal rotation. The surgeon was allowed to redirect the needle only once without withdrawing the needle from the entry site. After injection, arthroscopic confirmation of needle position in the joint and the presence of backflow from the posterior portal cannula were used to determine accuracy and the relation of the needle to adjacent anatomy. Results: Of the 42 injections, 38 needles were inserted accurately into the glenohumeral joint (91% accuracy rate), most through the rotator interval (21) or the long head of the biceps tendon (9). Four needles were placed inaccurately into the anterior synovium and subacromial space. Adhesive capsulitis was the diagnosis in 3 of those 4 shoulders but in only 5 of the 38 shoulders in the group with accurate placement (P <.05). Body mass index was not statistically different between the accurate and inaccurate injection groups (P > .05). Conclusions: Anterosuperior glenohumeral joint injection without image guidance provides an accuracy rate of 91%. The anterosuperior technique for glenohumeral injections yields an accuracy rate higher than that of the standard anterior techniques and comparable to that of posterior injection. Level of Evidence Level IV, diagnostic study.

AB - Purpose: Our objective was to assess the accuracy rate of needle placement with the anterosuperior technique of glenohumeral joint injection that uses familiar palpable superficial landmarks as a guide instead of diagnostic imaging. Methods: Between April 2007 and October 2007 at our institution, 42 patients met the study inclusion criteria of being aged 18 years or older and undergoing shoulder arthroscopy. For the injection (performed by 1 surgeon), anesthetized patients were placed in the beach-chair position with the arm in adduction and internal rotation. The surgeon was allowed to redirect the needle only once without withdrawing the needle from the entry site. After injection, arthroscopic confirmation of needle position in the joint and the presence of backflow from the posterior portal cannula were used to determine accuracy and the relation of the needle to adjacent anatomy. Results: Of the 42 injections, 38 needles were inserted accurately into the glenohumeral joint (91% accuracy rate), most through the rotator interval (21) or the long head of the biceps tendon (9). Four needles were placed inaccurately into the anterior synovium and subacromial space. Adhesive capsulitis was the diagnosis in 3 of those 4 shoulders but in only 5 of the 38 shoulders in the group with accurate placement (P <.05). Body mass index was not statistically different between the accurate and inaccurate injection groups (P > .05). Conclusions: Anterosuperior glenohumeral joint injection without image guidance provides an accuracy rate of 91%. The anterosuperior technique for glenohumeral injections yields an accuracy rate higher than that of the standard anterior techniques and comparable to that of posterior injection. Level of Evidence Level IV, diagnostic study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957894566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957894566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.02.010

DO - 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.02.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 21624668

AN - SCOPUS:79957894566

VL - 27

SP - 745

EP - 749

JO - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery

JF - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery

SN - 0749-8063

IS - 6

ER -