ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents

W. Gregory Hundley, David A. Bluemke, J. Paul Finn, Scott D. Flamm, Mark A. Fogel, Matthias G. Friedrich, Vincent B. Ho, Michael Jerosch-Herold, Christopher M. Kramer, Warren J. Manning, Manesh Patel, Gerald M. Pohost, Arthur E. Stillman, Richard D. White, Pamela K. Woodard

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

With its advantages in studying patients with cardiovascular disease and ability to provide high-resolution images, CMR offers a suitable mechanism for assessment in various clinical and research applications. Table 11 summarizes the writing committee's potential indications for the use of CMR in clinical practice situations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2614-2662
Number of pages49
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume55
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 8 2010

Keywords

  • ACCF/AHA Expert Consensus Document
  • cardiovascular disease
  • cardiovascular magnetic resonance
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this