TY - JOUR
T1 - Accessibility and the demand for preventive care
AU - Salkever, David S.
N1 - Funding Information:
* Financial support from the National Center for Health Services Research under Grant HS-01329 is gratefully acknowledged. t However, serious questions have also been raised about the value of preventive services. particularly routine physical examinations, for persons with no perceived symptoms of illness [S. 61.
Copyright:
Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1976
Y1 - 1976
N2 - The multifaceted nature of accessibility poses the problem for health care policy research of determining those types of access barriers which are most important. Following the suggestion by Aday and Andersen, we approach this problem by means of external validation, i.e. by empirical analysis of the role of different types of access barriers in determining whether or not individuals obtain care. Specifically, we estimate the effect of access barriers on the probability of obtaining a physical examination. The application of the basic economic demand model to the case of preventive services is discussed and several extensions of the basic model are suggested. Then multiple regression analysis is applied to household interview data from Baltimore, Velmont, and Saskatchewan to obtain physical examination demand functions. Our results provide some support for the predictions of the economic model concerning the effect of financial and physical access barriers on demand. But the fact that education, attitudes, and relationship to a regular source of care are the most consistently significant determinants of demand suggests that the current policy emphasis on financial and physical access barriers may be too narrow.
AB - The multifaceted nature of accessibility poses the problem for health care policy research of determining those types of access barriers which are most important. Following the suggestion by Aday and Andersen, we approach this problem by means of external validation, i.e. by empirical analysis of the role of different types of access barriers in determining whether or not individuals obtain care. Specifically, we estimate the effect of access barriers on the probability of obtaining a physical examination. The application of the basic economic demand model to the case of preventive services is discussed and several extensions of the basic model are suggested. Then multiple regression analysis is applied to household interview data from Baltimore, Velmont, and Saskatchewan to obtain physical examination demand functions. Our results provide some support for the predictions of the economic model concerning the effect of financial and physical access barriers on demand. But the fact that education, attitudes, and relationship to a regular source of care are the most consistently significant determinants of demand suggests that the current policy emphasis on financial and physical access barriers may be too narrow.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0017101759&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0017101759&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0037-7856(76)90114-1
DO - 10.1016/0037-7856(76)90114-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 1006338
AN - SCOPUS:0017101759
SN - 0037-7856
VL - 10
SP - 469
EP - 475
JO - Social Science and Medicine
JF - Social Science and Medicine
IS - 9-10
ER -