Acceptability of randomization to levonorgestrel versus copper intrauterine device among women requesting IUD insertion for contraception

Sharon L. Achilles; Beatrice A. Chen; Jessica K. Lee; Aileen M. Gariepy; Mitchell D. Creinin

doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2015.08.009

Acceptability of randomization to levonorgestrel versus copper intrauterine device among women requesting IUD insertion for contraception

Sharon L. Achilles, Beatrice A. Chen, Jessica K. Lee, Aileen M. Gariepy, Mitchell D. Creinin

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective Assess feasibility of randomizing women to intrauterine device (IUD) type. Study Design Women enrolling in a 2-month study who desired an IUD for contraception were randomized 1:1 to receive a levonorgestrel-releasing 52-mg IUD (LNG-IUD) or copper T380A IUD (Cu-IUD), understanding they could switch IUD type at the end of the study. Results Randomization to IUD type was acceptable to 54/55 (98%) women who screened. All 32 enrolled participants completed follow-up. Two women exchanged their IUD (Cu-IUD to LNG-IUD), and two requested removal (one LNG-IUD, one Cu-IUD). Overall, 88% continued their assigned IUD. Conclusions Randomization to IUD type is feasible, and few women change their IUD.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	572-574
Number of pages	3
Journal	Contraception
Volume	92
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.08.009
State	Published - Dec 1 2015
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Contraception
IUD randomization
Intrauterine device
Randomization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Reproductive Medicine
Obstetrics and Gynecology

Access to Document

10.1016/j.contraception.2015.08.009

Cite this

@article{c9c10e3fc5c34b42a4603f8463e8f4e2,

title = "Acceptability of randomization to levonorgestrel versus copper intrauterine device among women requesting IUD insertion for contraception",

abstract = "Objective Assess feasibility of randomizing women to intrauterine device (IUD) type. Study Design Women enrolling in a 2-month study who desired an IUD for contraception were randomized 1:1 to receive a levonorgestrel-releasing 52-mg IUD (LNG-IUD) or copper T380A IUD (Cu-IUD), understanding they could switch IUD type at the end of the study. Results Randomization to IUD type was acceptable to 54/55 (98%) women who screened. All 32 enrolled participants completed follow-up. Two women exchanged their IUD (Cu-IUD to LNG-IUD), and two requested removal (one LNG-IUD, one Cu-IUD). Overall, 88% continued their assigned IUD. Conclusions Randomization to IUD type is feasible, and few women change their IUD.",

keywords = "Contraception, IUD randomization, Intrauterine device, Randomization",

author = "Achilles, {Sharon L.} and Chen, {Beatrice A.} and Lee, {Jessica K.} and Gariepy, {Aileen M.} and Creinin, {Mitchell D.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2015 Elsevier Inc.",

year = "2015",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.contraception.2015.08.009",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "92",

pages = "572--574",

journal = "Contraception",

issn = "0010-7824",

publisher = "Elsevier USA",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acceptability of randomization to levonorgestrel versus copper intrauterine device among women requesting IUD insertion for contraception

AU - Achilles, Sharon L.

AU - Chen, Beatrice A.

AU - Lee, Jessica K.

AU - Gariepy, Aileen M.

AU - Creinin, Mitchell D.

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Objective Assess feasibility of randomizing women to intrauterine device (IUD) type. Study Design Women enrolling in a 2-month study who desired an IUD for contraception were randomized 1:1 to receive a levonorgestrel-releasing 52-mg IUD (LNG-IUD) or copper T380A IUD (Cu-IUD), understanding they could switch IUD type at the end of the study. Results Randomization to IUD type was acceptable to 54/55 (98%) women who screened. All 32 enrolled participants completed follow-up. Two women exchanged their IUD (Cu-IUD to LNG-IUD), and two requested removal (one LNG-IUD, one Cu-IUD). Overall, 88% continued their assigned IUD. Conclusions Randomization to IUD type is feasible, and few women change their IUD.

AB - Objective Assess feasibility of randomizing women to intrauterine device (IUD) type. Study Design Women enrolling in a 2-month study who desired an IUD for contraception were randomized 1:1 to receive a levonorgestrel-releasing 52-mg IUD (LNG-IUD) or copper T380A IUD (Cu-IUD), understanding they could switch IUD type at the end of the study. Results Randomization to IUD type was acceptable to 54/55 (98%) women who screened. All 32 enrolled participants completed follow-up. Two women exchanged their IUD (Cu-IUD to LNG-IUD), and two requested removal (one LNG-IUD, one Cu-IUD). Overall, 88% continued their assigned IUD. Conclusions Randomization to IUD type is feasible, and few women change their IUD.

KW - Contraception

KW - IUD randomization

KW - Intrauterine device

KW - Randomization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960485706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960485706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.08.009

DO - 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.08.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 26297203

AN - SCOPUS:84960485706

SN - 0010-7824

VL - 92

SP - 572

EP - 574

JO - Contraception

JF - Contraception

IS - 6

ER -

Acceptability of randomization to levonorgestrel versus copper intrauterine device among women requesting IUD insertion for contraception

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this