Ablation of Liver Metastasis: Is Preoperative Imaging Sufficiently Accurate?

James R. Wallace, Kathleen K. Christians, Francisco A. Quiroz, William D. Foley, Henry A. Pitt, Edward J. Quebbeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The recent introduction of cryotherapy and radiofrequency ablation of liver metastasis has expanded the indications for treatment. As technology has advanced, a percutaneous approach has been developed. Percutaneous treatment, however, requires accurate preoperative imaging. From 1993 to 1999, 179 patients underwent operative exploration for treatment of suspected hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma. One hundred seventy-seven patients were staged by preoperative CT, two patients were staged by MRI, and complete data were available in 176. Hepatic tumor count by preoperative imaging was compared to intraoperative tumor count obtained by inspection, palpation, ultrasonographic examination using a 3.5/7.5 MHz T probe, and careful gross sectioning of the resected specimen. Post hoc analysis was performed on 35 CT scans by two radiologists who specialize in abdominal CT. These radiologists were blinded to the intraoperative findings. Their interpretations were compared to the intraoperative counts and to each other. Thirty-four (19%) of 179 patients were deemed untreatable at operation because of unsuspected overwhelming liver involvement in 11 (6%) or extrahepatic metastases in 23 (13%). For the group, CT was accurate in 80 patients (45%), showed more lesions than were found in 16 (9%), and showed fewer metastases than were found in 80 (45%). When the preoperative scan predicted a solitary metastasis, it was correct in 45 (65%) of 69 patients and underestimated disease in 24 (35%). In the post hoc analysis, the mean numbers of lesions reported by the two radiologists did not differ from the mean number of tumors found; however, the radiologists' counts agreed on 16 (59%) and disagreed on 11 (41%) of the scans. The accuracy of CT decreased with increasing numbers of lesions. Regardless of the type of preoperative imaging, intraoperative findings altered the course of the operation in 96 (55%) of 176 patients. Preoperative imaging is not sufficiently accurate to permit adequate percutaneous treatment of hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)98-107
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Neoplasm Metastasis
Liver
Colorectal Neoplasms
Neoplasms
Cryotherapy
Palpation
Therapeutics
Technology
Radiologists

Keywords

  • Cryotherapy
  • Intraoperative ultrasound
  • Liver imaging
  • Liver neoplasm
  • Radiofrequency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Wallace, J. R., Christians, K. K., Quiroz, F. A., Foley, W. D., Pitt, H. A., & Quebbeman, E. J. (2001). Ablation of Liver Metastasis: Is Preoperative Imaging Sufficiently Accurate? Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 5(1), 98-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(01)80019-6

Ablation of Liver Metastasis : Is Preoperative Imaging Sufficiently Accurate? / Wallace, James R.; Christians, Kathleen K.; Quiroz, Francisco A.; Foley, William D.; Pitt, Henry A.; Quebbeman, Edward J.

In: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.2001, p. 98-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wallace, JR, Christians, KK, Quiroz, FA, Foley, WD, Pitt, HA & Quebbeman, EJ 2001, 'Ablation of Liver Metastasis: Is Preoperative Imaging Sufficiently Accurate?', Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 98-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(01)80019-6
Wallace, James R. ; Christians, Kathleen K. ; Quiroz, Francisco A. ; Foley, William D. ; Pitt, Henry A. ; Quebbeman, Edward J. / Ablation of Liver Metastasis : Is Preoperative Imaging Sufficiently Accurate?. In: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2001 ; Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 98-107.
@article{ba8f1d51abe14dbdb014696a8a90c2be,
title = "Ablation of Liver Metastasis: Is Preoperative Imaging Sufficiently Accurate?",
abstract = "The recent introduction of cryotherapy and radiofrequency ablation of liver metastasis has expanded the indications for treatment. As technology has advanced, a percutaneous approach has been developed. Percutaneous treatment, however, requires accurate preoperative imaging. From 1993 to 1999, 179 patients underwent operative exploration for treatment of suspected hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma. One hundred seventy-seven patients were staged by preoperative CT, two patients were staged by MRI, and complete data were available in 176. Hepatic tumor count by preoperative imaging was compared to intraoperative tumor count obtained by inspection, palpation, ultrasonographic examination using a 3.5/7.5 MHz T probe, and careful gross sectioning of the resected specimen. Post hoc analysis was performed on 35 CT scans by two radiologists who specialize in abdominal CT. These radiologists were blinded to the intraoperative findings. Their interpretations were compared to the intraoperative counts and to each other. Thirty-four (19{\%}) of 179 patients were deemed untreatable at operation because of unsuspected overwhelming liver involvement in 11 (6{\%}) or extrahepatic metastases in 23 (13{\%}). For the group, CT was accurate in 80 patients (45{\%}), showed more lesions than were found in 16 (9{\%}), and showed fewer metastases than were found in 80 (45{\%}). When the preoperative scan predicted a solitary metastasis, it was correct in 45 (65{\%}) of 69 patients and underestimated disease in 24 (35{\%}). In the post hoc analysis, the mean numbers of lesions reported by the two radiologists did not differ from the mean number of tumors found; however, the radiologists' counts agreed on 16 (59{\%}) and disagreed on 11 (41{\%}) of the scans. The accuracy of CT decreased with increasing numbers of lesions. Regardless of the type of preoperative imaging, intraoperative findings altered the course of the operation in 96 (55{\%}) of 176 patients. Preoperative imaging is not sufficiently accurate to permit adequate percutaneous treatment of hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma.",
keywords = "Cryotherapy, Intraoperative ultrasound, Liver imaging, Liver neoplasm, Radiofrequency",
author = "Wallace, {James R.} and Christians, {Kathleen K.} and Quiroz, {Francisco A.} and Foley, {William D.} and Pitt, {Henry A.} and Quebbeman, {Edward J.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1091-255X(01)80019-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "98--107",
journal = "Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery",
issn = "1091-255X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ablation of Liver Metastasis

T2 - Is Preoperative Imaging Sufficiently Accurate?

AU - Wallace, James R.

AU - Christians, Kathleen K.

AU - Quiroz, Francisco A.

AU - Foley, William D.

AU - Pitt, Henry A.

AU - Quebbeman, Edward J.

PY - 2001/1

Y1 - 2001/1

N2 - The recent introduction of cryotherapy and radiofrequency ablation of liver metastasis has expanded the indications for treatment. As technology has advanced, a percutaneous approach has been developed. Percutaneous treatment, however, requires accurate preoperative imaging. From 1993 to 1999, 179 patients underwent operative exploration for treatment of suspected hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma. One hundred seventy-seven patients were staged by preoperative CT, two patients were staged by MRI, and complete data were available in 176. Hepatic tumor count by preoperative imaging was compared to intraoperative tumor count obtained by inspection, palpation, ultrasonographic examination using a 3.5/7.5 MHz T probe, and careful gross sectioning of the resected specimen. Post hoc analysis was performed on 35 CT scans by two radiologists who specialize in abdominal CT. These radiologists were blinded to the intraoperative findings. Their interpretations were compared to the intraoperative counts and to each other. Thirty-four (19%) of 179 patients were deemed untreatable at operation because of unsuspected overwhelming liver involvement in 11 (6%) or extrahepatic metastases in 23 (13%). For the group, CT was accurate in 80 patients (45%), showed more lesions than were found in 16 (9%), and showed fewer metastases than were found in 80 (45%). When the preoperative scan predicted a solitary metastasis, it was correct in 45 (65%) of 69 patients and underestimated disease in 24 (35%). In the post hoc analysis, the mean numbers of lesions reported by the two radiologists did not differ from the mean number of tumors found; however, the radiologists' counts agreed on 16 (59%) and disagreed on 11 (41%) of the scans. The accuracy of CT decreased with increasing numbers of lesions. Regardless of the type of preoperative imaging, intraoperative findings altered the course of the operation in 96 (55%) of 176 patients. Preoperative imaging is not sufficiently accurate to permit adequate percutaneous treatment of hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma.

AB - The recent introduction of cryotherapy and radiofrequency ablation of liver metastasis has expanded the indications for treatment. As technology has advanced, a percutaneous approach has been developed. Percutaneous treatment, however, requires accurate preoperative imaging. From 1993 to 1999, 179 patients underwent operative exploration for treatment of suspected hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma. One hundred seventy-seven patients were staged by preoperative CT, two patients were staged by MRI, and complete data were available in 176. Hepatic tumor count by preoperative imaging was compared to intraoperative tumor count obtained by inspection, palpation, ultrasonographic examination using a 3.5/7.5 MHz T probe, and careful gross sectioning of the resected specimen. Post hoc analysis was performed on 35 CT scans by two radiologists who specialize in abdominal CT. These radiologists were blinded to the intraoperative findings. Their interpretations were compared to the intraoperative counts and to each other. Thirty-four (19%) of 179 patients were deemed untreatable at operation because of unsuspected overwhelming liver involvement in 11 (6%) or extrahepatic metastases in 23 (13%). For the group, CT was accurate in 80 patients (45%), showed more lesions than were found in 16 (9%), and showed fewer metastases than were found in 80 (45%). When the preoperative scan predicted a solitary metastasis, it was correct in 45 (65%) of 69 patients and underestimated disease in 24 (35%). In the post hoc analysis, the mean numbers of lesions reported by the two radiologists did not differ from the mean number of tumors found; however, the radiologists' counts agreed on 16 (59%) and disagreed on 11 (41%) of the scans. The accuracy of CT decreased with increasing numbers of lesions. Regardless of the type of preoperative imaging, intraoperative findings altered the course of the operation in 96 (55%) of 176 patients. Preoperative imaging is not sufficiently accurate to permit adequate percutaneous treatment of hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma.

KW - Cryotherapy

KW - Intraoperative ultrasound

KW - Liver imaging

KW - Liver neoplasm

KW - Radiofrequency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035221738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035221738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1091-255X(01)80019-6

DO - 10.1016/S1091-255X(01)80019-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 11309654

AN - SCOPUS:0035221738

VL - 5

SP - 98

EP - 107

JO - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

JF - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

SN - 1091-255X

IS - 1

ER -