A validated subjective rating of display quality

The Maryland Visual Comfort Scale

F. Jacob Seagull, Erica Sutton, Tommy Lee, Carlos Godinez, Gyusung Lee, Adrian Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background Minimally invasive surgery requires high-quality imaging to provide effective visual displays to surgeons. Whereas objective measures - pixels, resolution, display size, contrast ratio - are used to compare imaging systems, there are no tools for assessing the perceptual impact of these physical measures. We developed the "Maryland Visual Comfort Scale" (MVCS) to measure perceptual qualities in relation to an imaging system. We theorize that what the surgeon perceives as a high-quality image can be summarized by a scoring of seven characteristics related to human perception, and that image quality is not homogenous across a video display such that object location impacts perception and display quality. Method We created a rating scale for seven dimensions of display characteristics (contrast, detail, brightness, lighting uniformity, focus uniformity, color, sharpness). For validation, 30 participants viewed test patterns and manipulated physiologic images, rating the image quality for all seven dimensions as well as giving an overall rating. Image ratings for contrast and detail dimensions were assessed across five locations on the video display. For ratings, two imaging systems were used, differing primarily in the 10-mm zero-degree scope's quality: a standard scope and one taken from service for quality degradation. Results The rating scale was sensitive to differences in scope quality for all seven items in the MVCS (all p values > 0.01). Significant differences existed between quality ratings at central and peripheral locations (p < 0.05). Conclusions This seven-item rating scale for assessing visual comfort is reliable and sensitive to scope quality differences. The scale is sensitive to degradation of image quality at video display edges. These seven dimensions of display characteristics can be refined to create a psychometric to serve as a composite of perceptual quality in laparoscopy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)567-571
Number of pages5
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Lighting
Psychometrics
Laparoscopy
Color
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Image quality
  • Laparoscopy
  • Perception
  • Visual display

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

A validated subjective rating of display quality : The Maryland Visual Comfort Scale. / Seagull, F. Jacob; Sutton, Erica; Lee, Tommy; Godinez, Carlos; Lee, Gyusung; Park, Adrian.

In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, Vol. 25, No. 2, 02.2011, p. 567-571.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Seagull, F. Jacob ; Sutton, Erica ; Lee, Tommy ; Godinez, Carlos ; Lee, Gyusung ; Park, Adrian. / A validated subjective rating of display quality : The Maryland Visual Comfort Scale. In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. 2011 ; Vol. 25, No. 2. pp. 567-571.
@article{0176a0d8d01e483096d3282c4f88a820,
title = "A validated subjective rating of display quality: The Maryland Visual Comfort Scale",
abstract = "Background Minimally invasive surgery requires high-quality imaging to provide effective visual displays to surgeons. Whereas objective measures - pixels, resolution, display size, contrast ratio - are used to compare imaging systems, there are no tools for assessing the perceptual impact of these physical measures. We developed the {"}Maryland Visual Comfort Scale{"} (MVCS) to measure perceptual qualities in relation to an imaging system. We theorize that what the surgeon perceives as a high-quality image can be summarized by a scoring of seven characteristics related to human perception, and that image quality is not homogenous across a video display such that object location impacts perception and display quality. Method We created a rating scale for seven dimensions of display characteristics (contrast, detail, brightness, lighting uniformity, focus uniformity, color, sharpness). For validation, 30 participants viewed test patterns and manipulated physiologic images, rating the image quality for all seven dimensions as well as giving an overall rating. Image ratings for contrast and detail dimensions were assessed across five locations on the video display. For ratings, two imaging systems were used, differing primarily in the 10-mm zero-degree scope's quality: a standard scope and one taken from service for quality degradation. Results The rating scale was sensitive to differences in scope quality for all seven items in the MVCS (all p values > 0.01). Significant differences existed between quality ratings at central and peripheral locations (p < 0.05). Conclusions This seven-item rating scale for assessing visual comfort is reliable and sensitive to scope quality differences. The scale is sensitive to degradation of image quality at video display edges. These seven dimensions of display characteristics can be refined to create a psychometric to serve as a composite of perceptual quality in laparoscopy.",
keywords = "Image quality, Laparoscopy, Perception, Visual display",
author = "Seagull, {F. Jacob} and Erica Sutton and Tommy Lee and Carlos Godinez and Gyusung Lee and Adrian Park",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-010-1220-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "567--571",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A validated subjective rating of display quality

T2 - The Maryland Visual Comfort Scale

AU - Seagull, F. Jacob

AU - Sutton, Erica

AU - Lee, Tommy

AU - Godinez, Carlos

AU - Lee, Gyusung

AU - Park, Adrian

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - Background Minimally invasive surgery requires high-quality imaging to provide effective visual displays to surgeons. Whereas objective measures - pixels, resolution, display size, contrast ratio - are used to compare imaging systems, there are no tools for assessing the perceptual impact of these physical measures. We developed the "Maryland Visual Comfort Scale" (MVCS) to measure perceptual qualities in relation to an imaging system. We theorize that what the surgeon perceives as a high-quality image can be summarized by a scoring of seven characteristics related to human perception, and that image quality is not homogenous across a video display such that object location impacts perception and display quality. Method We created a rating scale for seven dimensions of display characteristics (contrast, detail, brightness, lighting uniformity, focus uniformity, color, sharpness). For validation, 30 participants viewed test patterns and manipulated physiologic images, rating the image quality for all seven dimensions as well as giving an overall rating. Image ratings for contrast and detail dimensions were assessed across five locations on the video display. For ratings, two imaging systems were used, differing primarily in the 10-mm zero-degree scope's quality: a standard scope and one taken from service for quality degradation. Results The rating scale was sensitive to differences in scope quality for all seven items in the MVCS (all p values > 0.01). Significant differences existed between quality ratings at central and peripheral locations (p < 0.05). Conclusions This seven-item rating scale for assessing visual comfort is reliable and sensitive to scope quality differences. The scale is sensitive to degradation of image quality at video display edges. These seven dimensions of display characteristics can be refined to create a psychometric to serve as a composite of perceptual quality in laparoscopy.

AB - Background Minimally invasive surgery requires high-quality imaging to provide effective visual displays to surgeons. Whereas objective measures - pixels, resolution, display size, contrast ratio - are used to compare imaging systems, there are no tools for assessing the perceptual impact of these physical measures. We developed the "Maryland Visual Comfort Scale" (MVCS) to measure perceptual qualities in relation to an imaging system. We theorize that what the surgeon perceives as a high-quality image can be summarized by a scoring of seven characteristics related to human perception, and that image quality is not homogenous across a video display such that object location impacts perception and display quality. Method We created a rating scale for seven dimensions of display characteristics (contrast, detail, brightness, lighting uniformity, focus uniformity, color, sharpness). For validation, 30 participants viewed test patterns and manipulated physiologic images, rating the image quality for all seven dimensions as well as giving an overall rating. Image ratings for contrast and detail dimensions were assessed across five locations on the video display. For ratings, two imaging systems were used, differing primarily in the 10-mm zero-degree scope's quality: a standard scope and one taken from service for quality degradation. Results The rating scale was sensitive to differences in scope quality for all seven items in the MVCS (all p values > 0.01). Significant differences existed between quality ratings at central and peripheral locations (p < 0.05). Conclusions This seven-item rating scale for assessing visual comfort is reliable and sensitive to scope quality differences. The scale is sensitive to degradation of image quality at video display edges. These seven dimensions of display characteristics can be refined to create a psychometric to serve as a composite of perceptual quality in laparoscopy.

KW - Image quality

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Perception

KW - Visual display

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79954941399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79954941399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-010-1220-x

DO - 10.1007/s00464-010-1220-x

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 567

EP - 571

JO - Surgical Endoscopy

JF - Surgical Endoscopy

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 2

ER -