A systematic review of satisfaction with care at the end of life

Sydney E Dy, Lisa R. Shugarman, Karl A. Lorenz, Richard A. Mularski, Joanne Lynn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature to better understand the conceptualization of satisfaction with end-of-life care and the effectiveness of palliative care interventions on this outcome. Data sources included Medline and the Database of Reviews of Effects. The review included relevant qualitative studies and intervention studies using satisfaction as an outcome from 1990 to 2005. Reviewing 24,423 citations yielded 21 relevant qualitative studies, four systematic reviews, and eight additional intervention studies. The qualitative literature described the domains of accessibility and coordination; competence, including symptom management; communication and education; emotional support and personalization of care; and support of patients' decision-making. For collaboration and consultation interventions, eight of 13 studies showed a significant effect on satisfaction. A meta-analysis found that palliative care and hospice teams improved satisfaction, although most studies did not include satisfaction as an outcome. For other types of interventions, only two of six showed a significant effect. For heart failure coordination of care, only seven of 32 studies addressed this as an outcome; two of the three that compared satisfaction between groups showed a significant difference. Evaluations used many different measures, only one of which was designed for the end of life. In conclusion, researchers have conceptualized satisfaction in palliative care, and different types of palliative care interventions can improve satisfaction, but it is often not included as an outcome. More focus on these satisfaction elements might improve the effectiveness of end-of-life interventions and their evaluation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)124-129
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2008

Fingerprint

Terminal Care
Palliative Care
Hospices
Information Storage and Retrieval
Mental Competency
Meta-Analysis
Decision Making
Referral and Consultation
Heart Failure
Communication
Research Personnel
Databases
Education

Keywords

  • End-of-life care
  • Palliative care
  • Satisfaction
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

A systematic review of satisfaction with care at the end of life. / Dy, Sydney E; Shugarman, Lisa R.; Lorenz, Karl A.; Mularski, Richard A.; Lynn, Joanne.

In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Vol. 56, No. 1, 01.2008, p. 124-129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dy, Sydney E ; Shugarman, Lisa R. ; Lorenz, Karl A. ; Mularski, Richard A. ; Lynn, Joanne. / A systematic review of satisfaction with care at the end of life. In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2008 ; Vol. 56, No. 1. pp. 124-129.
@article{698e67338dd44d44963fd985d7f37f61,
title = "A systematic review of satisfaction with care at the end of life",
abstract = "The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature to better understand the conceptualization of satisfaction with end-of-life care and the effectiveness of palliative care interventions on this outcome. Data sources included Medline and the Database of Reviews of Effects. The review included relevant qualitative studies and intervention studies using satisfaction as an outcome from 1990 to 2005. Reviewing 24,423 citations yielded 21 relevant qualitative studies, four systematic reviews, and eight additional intervention studies. The qualitative literature described the domains of accessibility and coordination; competence, including symptom management; communication and education; emotional support and personalization of care; and support of patients' decision-making. For collaboration and consultation interventions, eight of 13 studies showed a significant effect on satisfaction. A meta-analysis found that palliative care and hospice teams improved satisfaction, although most studies did not include satisfaction as an outcome. For other types of interventions, only two of six showed a significant effect. For heart failure coordination of care, only seven of 32 studies addressed this as an outcome; two of the three that compared satisfaction between groups showed a significant difference. Evaluations used many different measures, only one of which was designed for the end of life. In conclusion, researchers have conceptualized satisfaction in palliative care, and different types of palliative care interventions can improve satisfaction, but it is often not included as an outcome. More focus on these satisfaction elements might improve the effectiveness of end-of-life interventions and their evaluation.",
keywords = "End-of-life care, Palliative care, Satisfaction, Systematic review",
author = "Dy, {Sydney E} and Shugarman, {Lisa R.} and Lorenz, {Karl A.} and Mularski, {Richard A.} and Joanne Lynn",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01507.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "124--129",
journal = "Journal of the American Geriatrics Society",
issn = "0002-8614",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A systematic review of satisfaction with care at the end of life

AU - Dy, Sydney E

AU - Shugarman, Lisa R.

AU - Lorenz, Karl A.

AU - Mularski, Richard A.

AU - Lynn, Joanne

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature to better understand the conceptualization of satisfaction with end-of-life care and the effectiveness of palliative care interventions on this outcome. Data sources included Medline and the Database of Reviews of Effects. The review included relevant qualitative studies and intervention studies using satisfaction as an outcome from 1990 to 2005. Reviewing 24,423 citations yielded 21 relevant qualitative studies, four systematic reviews, and eight additional intervention studies. The qualitative literature described the domains of accessibility and coordination; competence, including symptom management; communication and education; emotional support and personalization of care; and support of patients' decision-making. For collaboration and consultation interventions, eight of 13 studies showed a significant effect on satisfaction. A meta-analysis found that palliative care and hospice teams improved satisfaction, although most studies did not include satisfaction as an outcome. For other types of interventions, only two of six showed a significant effect. For heart failure coordination of care, only seven of 32 studies addressed this as an outcome; two of the three that compared satisfaction between groups showed a significant difference. Evaluations used many different measures, only one of which was designed for the end of life. In conclusion, researchers have conceptualized satisfaction in palliative care, and different types of palliative care interventions can improve satisfaction, but it is often not included as an outcome. More focus on these satisfaction elements might improve the effectiveness of end-of-life interventions and their evaluation.

AB - The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature to better understand the conceptualization of satisfaction with end-of-life care and the effectiveness of palliative care interventions on this outcome. Data sources included Medline and the Database of Reviews of Effects. The review included relevant qualitative studies and intervention studies using satisfaction as an outcome from 1990 to 2005. Reviewing 24,423 citations yielded 21 relevant qualitative studies, four systematic reviews, and eight additional intervention studies. The qualitative literature described the domains of accessibility and coordination; competence, including symptom management; communication and education; emotional support and personalization of care; and support of patients' decision-making. For collaboration and consultation interventions, eight of 13 studies showed a significant effect on satisfaction. A meta-analysis found that palliative care and hospice teams improved satisfaction, although most studies did not include satisfaction as an outcome. For other types of interventions, only two of six showed a significant effect. For heart failure coordination of care, only seven of 32 studies addressed this as an outcome; two of the three that compared satisfaction between groups showed a significant difference. Evaluations used many different measures, only one of which was designed for the end of life. In conclusion, researchers have conceptualized satisfaction in palliative care, and different types of palliative care interventions can improve satisfaction, but it is often not included as an outcome. More focus on these satisfaction elements might improve the effectiveness of end-of-life interventions and their evaluation.

KW - End-of-life care

KW - Palliative care

KW - Satisfaction

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37749034550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37749034550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01507.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01507.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 18031485

AN - SCOPUS:37749034550

VL - 56

SP - 124

EP - 129

JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

SN - 0002-8614

IS - 1

ER -