A Survey to Evaluate Facilitators and Barriers to Quality Measurement and Improvement: Adapting Tools for Implementation Research in Palliative Care Programs

Sydney E Dy, Nebras Abu Al Hamayel, Susan Hannum, Ritu Sharma, Sarina R. Isenberg, Kamini Kuchinad, Junya Zhu, Katherine Smith, Karl A. Lorenz, Arif H. Kamal, Anne M. Walling, Sallie Weaver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Context: Although critical for improving patient outcomes, palliative care quality indicators are not yet widely used. Better understanding of facilitators and barriers to palliative care quality measurement and improvement might improve their use and program quality. Objectives: Development of a survey tool to assess palliative care team perspectives on facilitators and barriers to quality measurement and improvement in palliative care programs. Methods: We used the adapted Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to define domains and constructs to select instruments. We assembled a draft survey and assessed content validity through pilot testing and cognitive interviews with experts and frontline practitioners for key items. We analyzed responses using a constant comparative process to assess survey item issues and potential solutions. We developed a final survey using these results. Results: The survey includes five published instruments and two additional item sets. Domains include organizational characteristics, individual and team characteristics, intervention characteristics, and process of implementation. Survey modules include Quality Improvement in Palliative Care, Implementing Quality Improvement in the Palliative Care Program, Teamwork and Communication, Measuring the Quality of Palliative Care, and Palliative Care Quality in Your Program. Key refinements from cognitive interviews included item wording on palliative care team members, programs, and quality issues. Conclusion: This novel, adaptable instrument assesses palliative care team perspectives on barriers and facilitators for quality measurement and improvement in palliative care programs. Next steps include evaluation of the survey's construct validity and how survey results correlate with findings from program quality initiatives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Pain and Symptom Management
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Palliative Care
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires
Interviews
Quality of Health Care
Reproducibility of Results
Communication

Keywords

  • Cognitive interviews
  • Implementation research
  • Palliative care
  • Quality improvement
  • Quality measurement
  • Survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

A Survey to Evaluate Facilitators and Barriers to Quality Measurement and Improvement : Adapting Tools for Implementation Research in Palliative Care Programs. / Dy, Sydney E; Al Hamayel, Nebras Abu; Hannum, Susan; Sharma, Ritu; Isenberg, Sarina R.; Kuchinad, Kamini; Zhu, Junya; Smith, Katherine; Lorenz, Karl A.; Kamal, Arif H.; Walling, Anne M.; Weaver, Sallie.

In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dy, Sydney E ; Al Hamayel, Nebras Abu ; Hannum, Susan ; Sharma, Ritu ; Isenberg, Sarina R. ; Kuchinad, Kamini ; Zhu, Junya ; Smith, Katherine ; Lorenz, Karl A. ; Kamal, Arif H. ; Walling, Anne M. ; Weaver, Sallie. / A Survey to Evaluate Facilitators and Barriers to Quality Measurement and Improvement : Adapting Tools for Implementation Research in Palliative Care Programs. In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2017.
@article{7a9caf1ce3d8431199401b42311896a0,
title = "A Survey to Evaluate Facilitators and Barriers to Quality Measurement and Improvement: Adapting Tools for Implementation Research in Palliative Care Programs",
abstract = "Context: Although critical for improving patient outcomes, palliative care quality indicators are not yet widely used. Better understanding of facilitators and barriers to palliative care quality measurement and improvement might improve their use and program quality. Objectives: Development of a survey tool to assess palliative care team perspectives on facilitators and barriers to quality measurement and improvement in palliative care programs. Methods: We used the adapted Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to define domains and constructs to select instruments. We assembled a draft survey and assessed content validity through pilot testing and cognitive interviews with experts and frontline practitioners for key items. We analyzed responses using a constant comparative process to assess survey item issues and potential solutions. We developed a final survey using these results. Results: The survey includes five published instruments and two additional item sets. Domains include organizational characteristics, individual and team characteristics, intervention characteristics, and process of implementation. Survey modules include Quality Improvement in Palliative Care, Implementing Quality Improvement in the Palliative Care Program, Teamwork and Communication, Measuring the Quality of Palliative Care, and Palliative Care Quality in Your Program. Key refinements from cognitive interviews included item wording on palliative care team members, programs, and quality issues. Conclusion: This novel, adaptable instrument assesses palliative care team perspectives on barriers and facilitators for quality measurement and improvement in palliative care programs. Next steps include evaluation of the survey's construct validity and how survey results correlate with findings from program quality initiatives.",
keywords = "Cognitive interviews, Implementation research, Palliative care, Quality improvement, Quality measurement, Survey",
author = "Dy, {Sydney E} and {Al Hamayel}, {Nebras Abu} and Susan Hannum and Ritu Sharma and Isenberg, {Sarina R.} and Kamini Kuchinad and Junya Zhu and Katherine Smith and Lorenz, {Karl A.} and Kamal, {Arif H.} and Walling, {Anne M.} and Sallie Weaver",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.06.008",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Pain and Symptom Management",
issn = "0885-3924",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Survey to Evaluate Facilitators and Barriers to Quality Measurement and Improvement

T2 - Adapting Tools for Implementation Research in Palliative Care Programs

AU - Dy, Sydney E

AU - Al Hamayel, Nebras Abu

AU - Hannum, Susan

AU - Sharma, Ritu

AU - Isenberg, Sarina R.

AU - Kuchinad, Kamini

AU - Zhu, Junya

AU - Smith, Katherine

AU - Lorenz, Karl A.

AU - Kamal, Arif H.

AU - Walling, Anne M.

AU - Weaver, Sallie

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Context: Although critical for improving patient outcomes, palliative care quality indicators are not yet widely used. Better understanding of facilitators and barriers to palliative care quality measurement and improvement might improve their use and program quality. Objectives: Development of a survey tool to assess palliative care team perspectives on facilitators and barriers to quality measurement and improvement in palliative care programs. Methods: We used the adapted Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to define domains and constructs to select instruments. We assembled a draft survey and assessed content validity through pilot testing and cognitive interviews with experts and frontline practitioners for key items. We analyzed responses using a constant comparative process to assess survey item issues and potential solutions. We developed a final survey using these results. Results: The survey includes five published instruments and two additional item sets. Domains include organizational characteristics, individual and team characteristics, intervention characteristics, and process of implementation. Survey modules include Quality Improvement in Palliative Care, Implementing Quality Improvement in the Palliative Care Program, Teamwork and Communication, Measuring the Quality of Palliative Care, and Palliative Care Quality in Your Program. Key refinements from cognitive interviews included item wording on palliative care team members, programs, and quality issues. Conclusion: This novel, adaptable instrument assesses palliative care team perspectives on barriers and facilitators for quality measurement and improvement in palliative care programs. Next steps include evaluation of the survey's construct validity and how survey results correlate with findings from program quality initiatives.

AB - Context: Although critical for improving patient outcomes, palliative care quality indicators are not yet widely used. Better understanding of facilitators and barriers to palliative care quality measurement and improvement might improve their use and program quality. Objectives: Development of a survey tool to assess palliative care team perspectives on facilitators and barriers to quality measurement and improvement in palliative care programs. Methods: We used the adapted Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to define domains and constructs to select instruments. We assembled a draft survey and assessed content validity through pilot testing and cognitive interviews with experts and frontline practitioners for key items. We analyzed responses using a constant comparative process to assess survey item issues and potential solutions. We developed a final survey using these results. Results: The survey includes five published instruments and two additional item sets. Domains include organizational characteristics, individual and team characteristics, intervention characteristics, and process of implementation. Survey modules include Quality Improvement in Palliative Care, Implementing Quality Improvement in the Palliative Care Program, Teamwork and Communication, Measuring the Quality of Palliative Care, and Palliative Care Quality in Your Program. Key refinements from cognitive interviews included item wording on palliative care team members, programs, and quality issues. Conclusion: This novel, adaptable instrument assesses palliative care team perspectives on barriers and facilitators for quality measurement and improvement in palliative care programs. Next steps include evaluation of the survey's construct validity and how survey results correlate with findings from program quality initiatives.

KW - Cognitive interviews

KW - Implementation research

KW - Palliative care

KW - Quality improvement

KW - Quality measurement

KW - Survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031097144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031097144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.06.008

DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.06.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 28801007

AN - SCOPUS:85031097144

JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

SN - 0885-3924

ER -