A Survey to Evaluate Facilitators and Barriers to Quality Measurement and Improvement: Adapting Tools for Implementation Research in Palliative Care Programs

Sydney M. Dy, Nebras Abu Al Hamayel, Susan M. Hannum, Ritu Sharma, Sarina R. Isenberg, Kamini Kuchinad, Junya Zhu, Katherine Smith, Karl A. Lorenz, Arif H. Kamal, Anne M. Walling, Sallie J. Weaver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Context Although critical for improving patient outcomes, palliative care quality indicators are not yet widely used. Better understanding of facilitators and barriers to palliative care quality measurement and improvement might improve their use and program quality. Objectives Development of a survey tool to assess palliative care team perspectives on facilitators and barriers to quality measurement and improvement in palliative care programs. Methods We used the adapted Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to define domains and constructs to select instruments. We assembled a draft survey and assessed content validity through pilot testing and cognitive interviews with experts and frontline practitioners for key items. We analyzed responses using a constant comparative process to assess survey item issues and potential solutions. We developed a final survey using these results. Results The survey includes five published instruments and two additional item sets. Domains include organizational characteristics, individual and team characteristics, intervention characteristics, and process of implementation. Survey modules include Quality Improvement in Palliative Care, Implementing Quality Improvement in the Palliative Care Program, Teamwork and Communication, Measuring the Quality of Palliative Care, and Palliative Care Quality in Your Program. Key refinements from cognitive interviews included item wording on palliative care team members, programs, and quality issues. Conclusion This novel, adaptable instrument assesses palliative care team perspectives on barriers and facilitators for quality measurement and improvement in palliative care programs. Next steps include evaluation of the survey's construct validity and how survey results correlate with findings from program quality initiatives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)806-814
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume54
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2017

Keywords

  • Implementation research
  • cognitive interviews
  • palliative care
  • quality improvement
  • quality measurement
  • survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A Survey to Evaluate Facilitators and Barriers to Quality Measurement and Improvement: Adapting Tools for Implementation Research in Palliative Care Programs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this