A Survey of Training in Rehabilitation Psychology Practice in the United States and Canada: 2007

William Stiers, Kirk Stucky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Examine the structures, processes, and outcomes of training for rehabilitation psychology practice in the United States and Canada during 2007. Methods: Public data sources provided 947 potential training sites and programs, with 635 meeting selection criteria, from which 328 unique sites were identified. Of these, 117 sites (36%) reported providing training in rehabilitation psychology practice, and were sent a survey. Eighty percent (80%) returned the survey (n = 94). Results: There were nearly equal numbers of intern and resident training sites. Of the resident training sites, 46% had a complete rehabilitation focus, and 41% had faculty with American Board of Rehabilitation Psychology (ABRP) certification. Resident training sites ranged from 73% to 100% in meeting the Patterson and Hanson (1995) training guidelines, and ranged from 7% to 100% in formally teaching the current ABRP required competencies. Discussion: Many rehabilitation patients receive psychological services from practitioners whose professional emphasis is not in rehabilitation psychology, and many trainees involved with rehabilitation populations do not receive comprehensive training in rehabilitation psychology. There is a need for increased structure in and funding of training programs for rehabilitation psychology practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)536-543
Number of pages8
JournalRehabilitation Psychology
Volume53
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2008

Fingerprint

Canada
Rehabilitation
Psychology
Education
Surveys and Questionnaires
Information Storage and Retrieval
Certification
Patient Selection
Teaching
Guidelines
Population

Keywords

  • psychology training
  • rehabilitation psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

A Survey of Training in Rehabilitation Psychology Practice in the United States and Canada : 2007. / Stiers, William; Stucky, Kirk.

In: Rehabilitation Psychology, Vol. 53, No. 4, 11.2008, p. 536-543.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{49e2e9b3505242388a7a69dbfcd02e5c,
title = "A Survey of Training in Rehabilitation Psychology Practice in the United States and Canada: 2007",
abstract = "Objective: Examine the structures, processes, and outcomes of training for rehabilitation psychology practice in the United States and Canada during 2007. Methods: Public data sources provided 947 potential training sites and programs, with 635 meeting selection criteria, from which 328 unique sites were identified. Of these, 117 sites (36{\%}) reported providing training in rehabilitation psychology practice, and were sent a survey. Eighty percent (80{\%}) returned the survey (n = 94). Results: There were nearly equal numbers of intern and resident training sites. Of the resident training sites, 46{\%} had a complete rehabilitation focus, and 41{\%} had faculty with American Board of Rehabilitation Psychology (ABRP) certification. Resident training sites ranged from 73{\%} to 100{\%} in meeting the Patterson and Hanson (1995) training guidelines, and ranged from 7{\%} to 100{\%} in formally teaching the current ABRP required competencies. Discussion: Many rehabilitation patients receive psychological services from practitioners whose professional emphasis is not in rehabilitation psychology, and many trainees involved with rehabilitation populations do not receive comprehensive training in rehabilitation psychology. There is a need for increased structure in and funding of training programs for rehabilitation psychology practice.",
keywords = "psychology training, rehabilitation psychology",
author = "William Stiers and Kirk Stucky",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1037/a0013827",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "536--543",
journal = "Rehabilitation Psychology",
issn = "0090-5550",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Survey of Training in Rehabilitation Psychology Practice in the United States and Canada

T2 - 2007

AU - Stiers, William

AU - Stucky, Kirk

PY - 2008/11

Y1 - 2008/11

N2 - Objective: Examine the structures, processes, and outcomes of training for rehabilitation psychology practice in the United States and Canada during 2007. Methods: Public data sources provided 947 potential training sites and programs, with 635 meeting selection criteria, from which 328 unique sites were identified. Of these, 117 sites (36%) reported providing training in rehabilitation psychology practice, and were sent a survey. Eighty percent (80%) returned the survey (n = 94). Results: There were nearly equal numbers of intern and resident training sites. Of the resident training sites, 46% had a complete rehabilitation focus, and 41% had faculty with American Board of Rehabilitation Psychology (ABRP) certification. Resident training sites ranged from 73% to 100% in meeting the Patterson and Hanson (1995) training guidelines, and ranged from 7% to 100% in formally teaching the current ABRP required competencies. Discussion: Many rehabilitation patients receive psychological services from practitioners whose professional emphasis is not in rehabilitation psychology, and many trainees involved with rehabilitation populations do not receive comprehensive training in rehabilitation psychology. There is a need for increased structure in and funding of training programs for rehabilitation psychology practice.

AB - Objective: Examine the structures, processes, and outcomes of training for rehabilitation psychology practice in the United States and Canada during 2007. Methods: Public data sources provided 947 potential training sites and programs, with 635 meeting selection criteria, from which 328 unique sites were identified. Of these, 117 sites (36%) reported providing training in rehabilitation psychology practice, and were sent a survey. Eighty percent (80%) returned the survey (n = 94). Results: There were nearly equal numbers of intern and resident training sites. Of the resident training sites, 46% had a complete rehabilitation focus, and 41% had faculty with American Board of Rehabilitation Psychology (ABRP) certification. Resident training sites ranged from 73% to 100% in meeting the Patterson and Hanson (1995) training guidelines, and ranged from 7% to 100% in formally teaching the current ABRP required competencies. Discussion: Many rehabilitation patients receive psychological services from practitioners whose professional emphasis is not in rehabilitation psychology, and many trainees involved with rehabilitation populations do not receive comprehensive training in rehabilitation psychology. There is a need for increased structure in and funding of training programs for rehabilitation psychology practice.

KW - psychology training

KW - rehabilitation psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57749114848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57749114848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0013827

DO - 10.1037/a0013827

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:57749114848

VL - 53

SP - 536

EP - 543

JO - Rehabilitation Psychology

JF - Rehabilitation Psychology

SN - 0090-5550

IS - 4

ER -