A stepwise model for simulation-based curriculum development for clinical skills, a modification of the six-step approach

Nehal N. Khamis, Richard M. Satava, Sami A. Alnassar, David E Kern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Despite the rapid growth in the use of simulation in health professions education, courses vary considerably in quality. Many do not integrate efficiently into an overall school/program curriculum or conform to academic accreditation requirements. Moreover, some of the guidelines for simulation design are specialty specific. Study design: We designed a model that integrates best practices for effective simulation-based training and a modification of Kern et al.’s 6-step approach for curriculum development. We invited international simulation and health professions education experts to complete a questionnaire evaluating the model. We reviewed comments and suggested modifications from respondents and reached consensus on a revised version of the model. Results: We recruited 17 simulation and education experts. They expressed a consensus on the seven proposed curricular steps: problem identification and general needs assessment, targeted needs assessment, goals and objectives, educational strategies, individual assessment/feedback, program evaluation, and implementation. We received several suggestions for descriptors that applied the steps to simulation, leading to some revisions in the model. Conclusion: We have developed a model that integrates principles of curriculum development and simulation design that is applicable across specialties. Its use could lead to high-quality simulation courses that integrate efficiently into an overall curriculum.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)279-287
Number of pages9
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Clinical Competence
Curriculum
Health Occupations
Needs Assessment
Health Education
Accreditation
Program Evaluation
Practice Guidelines
Guidelines
Education
Growth
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Curriculum development
  • Model
  • Simulation
  • Six step

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

A stepwise model for simulation-based curriculum development for clinical skills, a modification of the six-step approach. / Khamis, Nehal N.; Satava, Richard M.; Alnassar, Sami A.; Kern, David E.

In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, Vol. 30, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 279-287.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{711052ec9adf47e1820f71b0481fd3e0,
title = "A stepwise model for simulation-based curriculum development for clinical skills, a modification of the six-step approach",
abstract = "Background: Despite the rapid growth in the use of simulation in health professions education, courses vary considerably in quality. Many do not integrate efficiently into an overall school/program curriculum or conform to academic accreditation requirements. Moreover, some of the guidelines for simulation design are specialty specific. Study design: We designed a model that integrates best practices for effective simulation-based training and a modification of Kern et al.’s 6-step approach for curriculum development. We invited international simulation and health professions education experts to complete a questionnaire evaluating the model. We reviewed comments and suggested modifications from respondents and reached consensus on a revised version of the model. Results: We recruited 17 simulation and education experts. They expressed a consensus on the seven proposed curricular steps: problem identification and general needs assessment, targeted needs assessment, goals and objectives, educational strategies, individual assessment/feedback, program evaluation, and implementation. We received several suggestions for descriptors that applied the steps to simulation, leading to some revisions in the model. Conclusion: We have developed a model that integrates principles of curriculum development and simulation design that is applicable across specialties. Its use could lead to high-quality simulation courses that integrate efficiently into an overall curriculum.",
keywords = "Curriculum development, Model, Simulation, Six step",
author = "Khamis, {Nehal N.} and Satava, {Richard M.} and Alnassar, {Sami A.} and Kern, {David E}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-015-4206-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "279--287",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A stepwise model for simulation-based curriculum development for clinical skills, a modification of the six-step approach

AU - Khamis, Nehal N.

AU - Satava, Richard M.

AU - Alnassar, Sami A.

AU - Kern, David E

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Background: Despite the rapid growth in the use of simulation in health professions education, courses vary considerably in quality. Many do not integrate efficiently into an overall school/program curriculum or conform to academic accreditation requirements. Moreover, some of the guidelines for simulation design are specialty specific. Study design: We designed a model that integrates best practices for effective simulation-based training and a modification of Kern et al.’s 6-step approach for curriculum development. We invited international simulation and health professions education experts to complete a questionnaire evaluating the model. We reviewed comments and suggested modifications from respondents and reached consensus on a revised version of the model. Results: We recruited 17 simulation and education experts. They expressed a consensus on the seven proposed curricular steps: problem identification and general needs assessment, targeted needs assessment, goals and objectives, educational strategies, individual assessment/feedback, program evaluation, and implementation. We received several suggestions for descriptors that applied the steps to simulation, leading to some revisions in the model. Conclusion: We have developed a model that integrates principles of curriculum development and simulation design that is applicable across specialties. Its use could lead to high-quality simulation courses that integrate efficiently into an overall curriculum.

AB - Background: Despite the rapid growth in the use of simulation in health professions education, courses vary considerably in quality. Many do not integrate efficiently into an overall school/program curriculum or conform to academic accreditation requirements. Moreover, some of the guidelines for simulation design are specialty specific. Study design: We designed a model that integrates best practices for effective simulation-based training and a modification of Kern et al.’s 6-step approach for curriculum development. We invited international simulation and health professions education experts to complete a questionnaire evaluating the model. We reviewed comments and suggested modifications from respondents and reached consensus on a revised version of the model. Results: We recruited 17 simulation and education experts. They expressed a consensus on the seven proposed curricular steps: problem identification and general needs assessment, targeted needs assessment, goals and objectives, educational strategies, individual assessment/feedback, program evaluation, and implementation. We received several suggestions for descriptors that applied the steps to simulation, leading to some revisions in the model. Conclusion: We have developed a model that integrates principles of curriculum development and simulation design that is applicable across specialties. Its use could lead to high-quality simulation courses that integrate efficiently into an overall curriculum.

KW - Curriculum development

KW - Model

KW - Simulation

KW - Six step

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955209913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955209913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-015-4206-x

DO - 10.1007/s00464-015-4206-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 25899812

AN - SCOPUS:84955209913

VL - 30

SP - 279

EP - 287

JO - Surgical Endoscopy

JF - Surgical Endoscopy

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 1

ER -