TY - JOUR
T1 - A standardized approach for measuring multivariate equity in vaccination coverage, cost-of-illness, and health outcomes
T2 - Evidence from the Vaccine Economics Research for Sustainability & Equity (VERSE) project
AU - Patenaude, Bryan
AU - Odihi, Deborah
AU - Sriudomporn, Salin
AU - Mak, Joshua
AU - Watts, Elizabeth
AU - de Broucker, Gatien
N1 - Funding Information:
The funding source for this work was the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation under award INV-003813 . The funding source submitted feedback on the overall study design during the initial proposal stage, the funding source has no role in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - Following a call from the World Health Organization in 2017 for a methodology to monitor immunization coverage equity in line with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, this study outlines a standardized approach for measuring multivariate equity in vaccine coverage, economic impact, and health outcomes. The Vaccine Economics Research for Sustainability & Equity (VERSE) composite vaccination equity measurement approach is derived from literature on the measurement of socioeconomic inequality combined with measures of direct unfairness in healthcare access. The final metrics take the form of a concentration index for vaccination coverage where individuals are ranked by multivariate unfairness in access and an absolute equity gap representing the difference in coverage between the top and bottom quintiles of individuals ranked by multivariate unfairness in access. Regression decomposition is applied to the concentration index to determine each factor's relative influence on observed inequity. These methods are applied to India's National Family Health Survey (NFHS) from 2015 to 2016 to assess the equity in being fully-immunized for age vaccination coverage and zero-dose status. The multivariate absolute equity gap is 0.120 (SE: 003) and 0.371 (SE: 0.008) for zero-dose status and fully-immunized for age, respectively. Therefore, the most disadvantaged quintile is 12 percentage points more likely to be zero-dose than the most advantaged quintile and 37.1 percentage points less likely to be fully immunized. The primary correlate of unfair disadvantage for both outcomes is maternal education accounting for 27.4% and 19.1% of observed inequality. The VERSE model provides a standardized approach for measuring multivariate vaccine coverage equity. It also allows policymakers to determine the relative magnitude of factors influencing multivariate equity rather than only the correlates of socioeconomic or bivariate equity. This framework could be adapted to track equitable progress toward Universal Health Coverage (UHC) or outcomes beyond the vaccine space.
AB - Following a call from the World Health Organization in 2017 for a methodology to monitor immunization coverage equity in line with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, this study outlines a standardized approach for measuring multivariate equity in vaccine coverage, economic impact, and health outcomes. The Vaccine Economics Research for Sustainability & Equity (VERSE) composite vaccination equity measurement approach is derived from literature on the measurement of socioeconomic inequality combined with measures of direct unfairness in healthcare access. The final metrics take the form of a concentration index for vaccination coverage where individuals are ranked by multivariate unfairness in access and an absolute equity gap representing the difference in coverage between the top and bottom quintiles of individuals ranked by multivariate unfairness in access. Regression decomposition is applied to the concentration index to determine each factor's relative influence on observed inequity. These methods are applied to India's National Family Health Survey (NFHS) from 2015 to 2016 to assess the equity in being fully-immunized for age vaccination coverage and zero-dose status. The multivariate absolute equity gap is 0.120 (SE: 003) and 0.371 (SE: 0.008) for zero-dose status and fully-immunized for age, respectively. Therefore, the most disadvantaged quintile is 12 percentage points more likely to be zero-dose than the most advantaged quintile and 37.1 percentage points less likely to be fully immunized. The primary correlate of unfair disadvantage for both outcomes is maternal education accounting for 27.4% and 19.1% of observed inequality. The VERSE model provides a standardized approach for measuring multivariate vaccine coverage equity. It also allows policymakers to determine the relative magnitude of factors influencing multivariate equity rather than only the correlates of socioeconomic or bivariate equity. This framework could be adapted to track equitable progress toward Universal Health Coverage (UHC) or outcomes beyond the vaccine space.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129211111&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85129211111&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114979
DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114979
M3 - Article
C2 - 35462106
AN - SCOPUS:85129211111
SN - 0277-9536
VL - 302
JO - Ethics in Science and Medicine
JF - Ethics in Science and Medicine
M1 - 114979
ER -