A review of initiatives that link provider payment with quality measurement of maternal health services in low-and middle-income countries

Jenna Wright, Rena Eichler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

—To reduce maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality, health care payers are experimenting with ways to better align incentives to promote high-quality maternal health services. This review examined 26 recent initiatives of health care payers in 16 low-and middle-income countries to pay for quality, and not solely quantity, of maternal health services. Payers measured quality by assessing availability of structural inputs (24 of 26 cases), adherence to processes (25 of 26 cases), and observation of key outputs of health facilities (14 of 26 cases). Two payers sought to also assess quality through observed patient outcomes. In 25 of the initiatives, payers used the quality assessment to adjust facility payments; in the remaining initiative, the payer used the quality assessment to adjust payments to provincial governments, which in turn pay facilities. The recent growth in such payment systems suggests more health care payers have identified ways to link quality measurement with provider payment mechanisms. Eleven impact evaluations of systems documented changes in provider behavior consistent with various elements of quality; however, only three evaluations reported effects on maternal or newborn morbidity and mortality and do not conclude whether the design or flaws in how it was implemented led to the results. Implementation fidelity—the degree to which the initiative was implemented as designed—was not widely addressed and is an area for future research. Furthermore, although payers in low-and middle-income countries have identified ways to operationalize a payment system that adjusts payments based on some measure of quality, the complexity and level of resources required to operationalize them raise concerns about sustainability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)77-92
Number of pages16
JournalHealth Systems and Reform
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Maternal Health Services
Delivery of Health Care
Mothers
Newborn Infant
Morbidity
State Government
Mortality
Health Facilities
Motivation
Observation
Growth

Keywords

  • Maternal health
  • Provider payment
  • Quality
  • Results-based financing
  • Strategic purchasing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

@article{f4585d4e41e24eb68f67ebe1441cb512,
title = "A review of initiatives that link provider payment with quality measurement of maternal health services in low-and middle-income countries",
abstract = "—To reduce maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality, health care payers are experimenting with ways to better align incentives to promote high-quality maternal health services. This review examined 26 recent initiatives of health care payers in 16 low-and middle-income countries to pay for quality, and not solely quantity, of maternal health services. Payers measured quality by assessing availability of structural inputs (24 of 26 cases), adherence to processes (25 of 26 cases), and observation of key outputs of health facilities (14 of 26 cases). Two payers sought to also assess quality through observed patient outcomes. In 25 of the initiatives, payers used the quality assessment to adjust facility payments; in the remaining initiative, the payer used the quality assessment to adjust payments to provincial governments, which in turn pay facilities. The recent growth in such payment systems suggests more health care payers have identified ways to link quality measurement with provider payment mechanisms. Eleven impact evaluations of systems documented changes in provider behavior consistent with various elements of quality; however, only three evaluations reported effects on maternal or newborn morbidity and mortality and do not conclude whether the design or flaws in how it was implemented led to the results. Implementation fidelity—the degree to which the initiative was implemented as designed—was not widely addressed and is an area for future research. Furthermore, although payers in low-and middle-income countries have identified ways to operationalize a payment system that adjusts payments based on some measure of quality, the complexity and level of resources required to operationalize them raise concerns about sustainability.",
keywords = "Maternal health, Provider payment, Quality, Results-based financing, Strategic purchasing",
author = "Jenna Wright and Rena Eichler",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/23288604.2018.1440344",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "77--92",
journal = "Health systems and reform",
issn = "2328-8604",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A review of initiatives that link provider payment with quality measurement of maternal health services in low-and middle-income countries

AU - Wright, Jenna

AU - Eichler, Rena

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - —To reduce maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality, health care payers are experimenting with ways to better align incentives to promote high-quality maternal health services. This review examined 26 recent initiatives of health care payers in 16 low-and middle-income countries to pay for quality, and not solely quantity, of maternal health services. Payers measured quality by assessing availability of structural inputs (24 of 26 cases), adherence to processes (25 of 26 cases), and observation of key outputs of health facilities (14 of 26 cases). Two payers sought to also assess quality through observed patient outcomes. In 25 of the initiatives, payers used the quality assessment to adjust facility payments; in the remaining initiative, the payer used the quality assessment to adjust payments to provincial governments, which in turn pay facilities. The recent growth in such payment systems suggests more health care payers have identified ways to link quality measurement with provider payment mechanisms. Eleven impact evaluations of systems documented changes in provider behavior consistent with various elements of quality; however, only three evaluations reported effects on maternal or newborn morbidity and mortality and do not conclude whether the design or flaws in how it was implemented led to the results. Implementation fidelity—the degree to which the initiative was implemented as designed—was not widely addressed and is an area for future research. Furthermore, although payers in low-and middle-income countries have identified ways to operationalize a payment system that adjusts payments based on some measure of quality, the complexity and level of resources required to operationalize them raise concerns about sustainability.

AB - —To reduce maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality, health care payers are experimenting with ways to better align incentives to promote high-quality maternal health services. This review examined 26 recent initiatives of health care payers in 16 low-and middle-income countries to pay for quality, and not solely quantity, of maternal health services. Payers measured quality by assessing availability of structural inputs (24 of 26 cases), adherence to processes (25 of 26 cases), and observation of key outputs of health facilities (14 of 26 cases). Two payers sought to also assess quality through observed patient outcomes. In 25 of the initiatives, payers used the quality assessment to adjust facility payments; in the remaining initiative, the payer used the quality assessment to adjust payments to provincial governments, which in turn pay facilities. The recent growth in such payment systems suggests more health care payers have identified ways to link quality measurement with provider payment mechanisms. Eleven impact evaluations of systems documented changes in provider behavior consistent with various elements of quality; however, only three evaluations reported effects on maternal or newborn morbidity and mortality and do not conclude whether the design or flaws in how it was implemented led to the results. Implementation fidelity—the degree to which the initiative was implemented as designed—was not widely addressed and is an area for future research. Furthermore, although payers in low-and middle-income countries have identified ways to operationalize a payment system that adjusts payments based on some measure of quality, the complexity and level of resources required to operationalize them raise concerns about sustainability.

KW - Maternal health

KW - Provider payment

KW - Quality

KW - Results-based financing

KW - Strategic purchasing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064473412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064473412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/23288604.2018.1440344

DO - 10.1080/23288604.2018.1440344

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 77

EP - 92

JO - Health systems and reform

JF - Health systems and reform

SN - 2328-8604

IS - 2

ER -