A retrospective study of intraoperative awareness with methodological implications

George A. Mashour, Luke Y.J. Wang, Christopher R. Turner, John C. Vandervest, Amy Shanks, Kevin K. Tremper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


BACKGROUND: Awareness during general anesthesia is a problem receiving increased attention from physicians and patients. Large multicentered studies have established an accepted incidence of awareness during general anesthesia as approximately 1-2 per 1000 cases or 0.15%. More recent retrospective data, however, suggest that the actual incidence may be as low as 0.0068%. METHODS: To assess the incidence of awareness at our institution, we conducted a review of adult patients undergoing surgical procedures over a 3-year period. Information on awareness came from entries of "Intraoperative Awareness" captured during our standard evaluations on postoperative day one in our perioperative information system. Patients were not questioned specifically about awareness. RESULTS: We reviewed 116,478 charts; 65,061 patients received general anesthesia and 51,417 received other types of anesthesia. Of the patients receiving general anesthesia, 44,006 had complete postoperative documentation. The reported incidence of undesired intraoperative awareness in this population was 10/44,006 (1/4401 or 0.023%). Of the patients who received other anesthetic modalities, 22,885 had complete postoperative documentation. Undesired intraoperative awareness was reported in 7/22,885 patients who did not receive general anesthesia (1/3269 or 0.03%). The reported incidence of intraoperative awareness was not statistically different between the two groups (P = 0.54). Relative risk of intraoperative awareness during a general anesthetic compared with a nongeneral anesthetic was 0.74, with 95% confidence interval [0.28, 2.0]. CONCLUSION: Using a retrospective methodology, reports of intraoperative awareness are not statistically different in patients who received general anesthesia compared with those who did not. These results suggest that, despite success with other rare perioperative events, the resolution of retrospective database analyses may be too low to study intraoperative awareness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)521-526
Number of pages6
JournalAnesthesia and analgesia
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'A retrospective study of intraoperative awareness with methodological implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this